Suppr超能文献

关于巨型翼龙的体型和飞行多样性、将鸟类用作翼龙的模拟物以及对翼龙不能飞行的评论。

On the size and flight diversity of giant pterosaurs, the use of birds as pterosaur analogues and comments on pterosaur flightlessness.

机构信息

School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2010 Nov 15;5(11):e13982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013982.

Abstract

The size and flight mechanics of giant pterosaurs have received considerable research interest for the last century but are confused by conflicting interpretations of pterosaur biology and flight capabilities. Avian biomechanical parameters have often been applied to pterosaurs in such research but, due to considerable differences in avian and pterosaur anatomy, have lead to systematic errors interpreting pterosaur flight mechanics. Such assumptions have lead to assertions that giant pterosaurs were extremely lightweight to facilitate flight or, if more realistic masses are assumed, were flightless. Reappraisal of the proportions, scaling and morphology of giant pterosaur fossils suggests that bird and pterosaur wing structure, gross anatomy and launch kinematics are too different to be considered mechanically interchangeable. Conclusions assuming such interchangeability--including those indicating that giant pterosaurs were flightless--are found to be based on inaccurate and poorly supported assumptions of structural scaling and launch kinematics. Pterosaur bone strength and flap-gliding performance demonstrate that giant pterosaur anatomy was capable of generating sufficient lift and thrust for powered flight as well as resisting flight loading stresses. The retention of flight characteristics across giant pterosaur skeletons and their considerable robustness compared to similarly-massed terrestrial animals suggest that giant pterosaurs were not flightless. Moreover, the term 'giant pterosaur' includes at least two radically different forms with very distinct palaeoecological signatures and, accordingly, all but the most basic sweeping conclusions about giant pterosaur flight should be treated with caution. Reappraisal of giant pterosaur material also reveals that the size of the largest pterosaurs, previously suggested to have wingspans up to 13 m and masses up to 544 kg, have been overestimated. Scaling of fragmentary giant pterosaur remains have been misled by distorted fossils or used inappropriate scaling techniques, indicating that 10-11 m wingspans and masses of 200-250 kg are the most reliable upper estimates of known pterosaur size.

摘要

一个世纪以来,巨型翼龙的体型和飞行力学一直是研究的热点,但对翼龙生物学和飞行能力的不同解释使其变得复杂。在这类研究中,通常会将鸟类的生物力学参数应用于翼龙,但由于鸟类和翼龙解剖结构的巨大差异,这导致了对翼龙飞行力学的系统错误解释。这种假设导致了一些断言,即巨型翼龙非常轻,以方便飞行,或者,如果假设更现实的质量,它们是不能飞行的。对巨型翼龙化石的比例、比例和形态的重新评估表明,鸟类和翼龙的翅膀结构、大体解剖结构和起飞运动学差异太大,不能被认为在机械上是可互换的。假设这种可互换性的结论——包括那些表明巨型翼龙不能飞行的结论——被发现是基于对结构比例和起飞运动学的不准确和支持不足的假设。翼龙的骨骼强度和拍动滑翔性能表明,巨型翼龙的解剖结构能够产生足够的升力和推力,以进行动力飞行,并能抵抗飞行负荷的压力。巨型翼龙骨骼保留了飞行特征,而且与同等质量的陆地动物相比,它们相当坚固,这表明巨型翼龙并非不能飞行。此外,“巨型翼龙”一词至少包括两种截然不同的形式,它们具有非常不同的古生态特征,因此,对于巨型翼龙飞行的所有结论,除了最基本的笼统结论外,都应该谨慎对待。对巨型翼龙材料的重新评估还表明,此前认为翼展达 13 米、质量达 544 公斤的最大翼龙的大小被高估了。对不完整的巨型翼龙遗骸的比例缩放受到变形化石的误导,或者使用了不适当的缩放技术,这表明 10-11 米的翼展和 200-250 公斤的质量是已知翼龙大小的最可靠上限估计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93ee/2981443/4cef92ee40c1/pone.0013982.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验