Karimi Mohammad Hossein, Ebadi Padideh, Pourfathollah Ali Akbar, Moazzeni Mohammad, Soheili Zahra Soheila, Samiee Shahram
Transplant Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Hybridoma (Larchmt). 2010 Dec;29(6):473-80. doi: 10.1089/hyb.2010.0060. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
In recent years, a new view of dendritic cells (DCs) as a main regulator of immunity to induce and maintain tolerance has been established. In vitro manipulation of their development and maturation is a topic of DC therapeutic application, which utilizes their inherent tolerogenicity. In this field, the therapeutic potential of antisense, siRNA, and blocking antibody are an interesting goal. In the present study, the efficiency of these three methods--siRNA, antisense, and blocking antibody--against CD40 molecule and its function in DCs and BCL1 cell line are compared. DCs were separated from mouse spleen and then cultured in vitro using Lipofectamine 2000 to deliver both silencers; the efficacy of transfection was estimated by flow cytometry. mRNA expression and protein synthesis were assessed by real time-PCR and flow cytometry, respectively. By Annexin V and propidium iodine staining, we could evaluate the viability of transfected cells. Knocking down the CD40 gene into separate groups of DCs by siRNA, antisense, and blocking antibody treated DCs can cause an increase in IL-4, decrease in IL-12, IFN-γ production, and allostimulation activity. Our results indicated that, in comparison to antisense and blocking antibody, siRNAs appear to be quantitatively more efficient in CD40 downregulation and their differences are significant.
近年来,树突状细胞(DCs)作为诱导和维持免疫耐受的主要调节因子的新观点已被确立。对其发育和成熟进行体外操作是DC治疗应用的一个课题,该应用利用了它们固有的耐受性。在这个领域,反义核酸、小干扰RNA(siRNA)和阻断抗体的治疗潜力是一个有趣的目标。在本研究中,比较了这三种方法——siRNA、反义核酸和阻断抗体——针对CD40分子及其在DCs和BCL1细胞系中的功能的效率。从小鼠脾脏中分离出DCs,然后使用Lipofectamine 2000在体外进行培养以递送两种沉默剂;通过流式细胞术评估转染效率。分别通过实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)和流式细胞术评估mRNA表达和蛋白质合成。通过膜联蛋白V和碘化丙啶染色,我们可以评估转染细胞的活力。用siRNA、反义核酸和阻断抗体处理DCs,在不同组的DCs中敲低CD40基因可导致白细胞介素-4(IL-4)增加、白细胞介素-12(IL-12)和γ干扰素(IFN-γ)产生减少以及同种异体刺激活性降低。我们的结果表明,与反义核酸和阻断抗体相比,siRNAs在下调CD40方面似乎在数量上更有效,且它们之间的差异具有显著性。