Suppr超能文献

严重创伤患者(损伤严重程度评分>15)中胸腹部创伤的预后意义

The prognostic significance of thoracic and abdominal trauma in severe trauma patients (Injury severity score > 15).

作者信息

Costa Gianluca, Tomassini Federico, Tierno Simone Maria, Venturini Luigi, Frezza Barbara, Cancrini Giulio, Stella Francesco

机构信息

Università Roma Sapienza--II Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Ann Ital Chir. 2010 May-Jun;81(3):171-6.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to assess the prognostic significance of thoracic and abdominal trauma in severely injured patients. A retrospective analysis was performed based on data from the period from March 1 2006 to December 31 2007, taken from the Trauma Registry of the University Hospital "SantAndrea" in Rome. A total of 844 trauma patients were entered in a database created for this purpose, and only patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15, (163 patients, 19.3%), were selected for the present study. These patients were divided into 2 groups: Group A (103 patients, 63.2%), consisting of patients with at least one thoracic injury, and Group B (46 patients, 28.2%) consisting of patients with concomitant thoracic and abdominal injuries. The impact of thoracic and abdominal trauma was studied by analyzing mortality and morbidity, in relation to patient age, cause and dynamics of trauma, length of hospital stay, and both ISS and New ISS (NISS). In a vast majority of cases, the cause of trauma was a road accident (126 patients, 77.3%). The mean age of patients with ISS > 15 was 45.2 +/- 19.3 years. The mean ISS and NISS were 25.7 +/- 10.5 and of 31.4 +/- 13.1 respectively. The overall morbidity and mortality rates were 18.4% (30 patients) and 28.8% (47 patients) respectively. In Group A the mortality rate was 23.3% (24 patients) and the morbidity rate was 33.9% (35 patients). In Group B mortality and morbidity rates were 369% (17 patients) and 43.5% (20 patients) respectively. It was shown that the presence of both thoracic and abdominal injuries significantly increases the risk of mortality and morbidity. In patients with predominantly thoracic injuries, NISS proved to be the more reliable score, while ISS appeared to be more accurate in evaluating patients with injuries affecting more than one region of the body.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估胸腹部创伤对重伤患者的预后意义。基于罗马“圣安德烈亚”大学医院创伤登记处2006年3月1日至2007年12月31日期间的数据进行回顾性分析。为此目的创建了一个数据库,共纳入844例创伤患者,本研究仅选择损伤严重度评分(ISS)>15的患者(163例患者,占19.3%)。这些患者分为两组:A组(103例患者,占63.2%),包括至少有一处胸部损伤的患者;B组(46例患者,占28.2%),包括同时有胸腹部损伤的患者。通过分析死亡率和发病率,研究胸腹部创伤的影响,分析内容涉及患者年龄、创伤原因和动态变化、住院时间以及ISS和新ISS(NISS)。在绝大多数情况下,创伤原因是道路交通事故(126例患者,占77.3%)。ISS>15的患者平均年龄为45.2±19.3岁。平均ISS和NISS分别为25.7±10.5和31.4±13.1。总体发病率和死亡率分别为18.4%(30例患者)和28.8%(47例患者)。A组死亡率为23.3%(24例患者),发病率为33.9%(35例患者)。B组死亡率和发病率分别为36.9%(17例患者)和43.5%(20例患者)。结果表明,胸腹部联合损伤显著增加了死亡率和发病率风险。在以胸部损伤为主的患者中,NISS被证明是更可靠的评分,而ISS在评估身体多个部位受伤的患者时似乎更准确。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验