University of Kansas Medical Center and Hospital, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2010;10(6):359-67. doi: 10.2165/11584720-000000000-00000.
Osteoporosis is a major public health problem resulting in significant morbidity, mortality, and utilization of healthcare resources. Bisphosphonates are the most widely prescribed drugs for increasing bone mass and preventing osteoporosis-related fractures. Although these drugs have proven efficacy and are generally considered safe, a clinical trial of once-yearly zoledronic acid reported an unexpected increase in the risk of cardiac arrhythmias, primarily due to serious atrial fibrillation (AF). Subsequently, a post hoc analysis of another clinical trial reported a nonsignificant trend toward an increased risk of serious AF. Based on these concerns, the US FDA issued a cautionary advisory and is conducting an ongoing safety review. A major limitation of the clinical trials was the fact that none were designed or powered to evaluate arrhythmia endpoints. In search of more definitive answers, several observational studies using both population-based cohort and case-control designs have attempted to verify this association. However, only two studies, one cohort and one case-control study, have found a positive association, while six additional studies have reported negative findings. While most of the observational studies attempted to control for confounders, the chosen variables have varied considerably, and other key potential confounders such as smoking were not controlled for in any of the studies. Because the occurrence of AF events in the studies was relatively low, four meta-analyses have been conducted to increase sample size by using pooled data from multiple studies. Again, results have been inconsistent, with two of the analyses reporting a significant increase in serious AF and two finding no association. Additionally, no direct evidence has identified any underlying mechanism to explain an increased arrhythmia risk with bisphosphonate therapy. However, several possible mechanisms have been proposed, including an activated inflammatory state, altered electrolytes impacting cardiac conduction, and long-term atrial structural changes. Due to the widespread use of bisphosphonates in a population for whom the baseline risk of AF also increases with advancing age, further prospective assessment of this possible association is clearly warranted. If an association does exist between bisphosphonates and an increased risk for AF, several additional questions will need to be answered including impact of baseline risk, the time course for increased risk, relationship to drug dose, and whether or not this represents a drug-class adverse effect. Until definitive evidence is available, clinicians will continue to have to make clinical judgments based on the available and often inconsistent evidence to date. To provide further perspective on this possible association, we performed a systematic search of the PubMed database from 1966 to 30 June 2010, drug regulatory websites, and drug manufacturer websites. In this review we summarize the findings from clinical trials, observational studies, and meta-analyses evaluating the risk of AF following bisphosphonate exposure, and discuss possible mechanisms that could explain an increased risk.
骨质疏松症是一个主要的公共卫生问题,会导致重大的发病率、死亡率和医疗资源的利用。双膦酸盐是增加骨量和预防骨质疏松性骨折最广泛使用的药物。尽管这些药物已被证明具有疗效,并且通常被认为是安全的,但一项关于每年一次唑来膦酸的临床试验报告称,心律失常的风险意外增加,主要是由于严重的心房颤动(AF)。随后,另一项临床试验的事后分析报告称,严重 AF 的风险呈无显著性趋势增加。基于这些担忧,美国 FDA 发布了一份警告性咨询,并正在进行正在进行的安全性审查。临床试验的一个主要局限性是,没有一个临床试验的设计或能力足以评估心律失常终点。为了寻找更明确的答案,一些使用基于人群的队列和病例对照设计的观察性研究试图验证这种关联。然而,只有两项研究,一项队列研究和一项病例对照研究,发现了阳性关联,而另外六项研究则报告了阴性结果。虽然大多数观察性研究试图控制混杂因素,但所选择的变量差异很大,而且任何研究都没有控制其他关键的潜在混杂因素,如吸烟。由于研究中 AF 事件的发生率相对较低,因此进行了四项荟萃分析,以使用来自多个研究的汇总数据来增加样本量。同样,结果也不一致,其中两项分析报告严重 AF 显著增加,两项分析未发现关联。此外,没有直接证据确定任何潜在机制来解释双膦酸盐治疗与心律失常风险增加之间的关系。然而,已经提出了几种可能的机制,包括激活的炎症状态、影响心脏传导的电解质改变以及长期的心房结构变化。由于双膦酸盐在人群中的广泛使用,而随着年龄的增长,AF 的基线风险也会增加,因此显然需要进一步前瞻性评估这种可能的关联。如果双膦酸盐与 AF 风险增加之间确实存在关联,那么还需要回答几个额外的问题,包括基线风险的影响、风险增加的时间过程、与药物剂量的关系以及是否存在药物类别不良效应。在有明确证据之前,临床医生将继续根据迄今为止可用的和通常不一致的证据做出临床判断。为了进一步了解这种可能的关联,我们对 1966 年至 2010 年 6 月 30 日的 PubMed 数据库、药物监管网站和药物制造商网站进行了系统搜索。在本综述中,我们总结了评估双膦酸盐暴露后 AF 风险的临床试验、观察性研究和荟萃分析的结果,并讨论了可能解释风险增加的机制。