Yasuoka Yoshinori, Abe Haruhiko, Umekawa Seiko, Katsuki Keiko, Tanaka Norio, Araki Ryo, Imanaka Takahiro, Matsutera Ryo, Morisawa Daisuke, Kitada Hirokazu, Hattori Susumu, Noda Yoshiki, Adachi Hidenori, Sasaki Tatsuya, Miyatake Kunio
Cardiovascular Division, Osaka Minami Medical Center, Kawachinagano, Osaka, Japan.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Mar;34(3):370-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02976.x. Epub 2010 Nov 22.
Interatrial septum pacing (IAS-P) decreases atrial conduction delay compared with right atrial appendage pacing (RAA-P). We evaluate the atrial contraction with strain rate of tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) during sinus activation or with IAS-P or RAA-P.
Fifty-two patients with permanent pacemaker for sinus node disease were enrolled in the study. Twenty-three subjects were with IAS-P and 29 with RAA-P. The time from end-diastole to peak end-diastolic strain rate was measured and corrected with RR interval on electrocardiogram. It was defined as the time from end-diastole to peak end-diastolic strain rate (TSRc), and the balance between maximum and minimum TSRc at three sites (ΔTSRc) was compared during sinus activation and with pacing rhythm in each group.
There were no significant differences observed in general characteristics and standard echocardiographic parameters except the duration of pacing P wave between the two groups. The duration was significantly shorter in the IAS-P group compared with the RAA-P group (95 ± 34 vs 138 ± 41; P = 0.001). TSRc was significantly different between sinus activation and pacing rhythm (36.3 ± 35.7 vs 61.6 ± 36.3; P = 0.003) in the RAA-P group, whereas no significant differences were observed in the IAS-P group (25.4 ± 12.1 vs 27.7 ± 14.7; NS). During the follow-up (mean 2.4 ± 0.7 years), the incidence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) conversion to permanent AF was not significantly different between the two groups.
IAS-P decreased the contraction delay on atrial TDI compared to RAA-P; however, it did not contribute to the reduction of AF incidence in the present study.
与右心耳起搏(RAA-P)相比,房间隔起搏(IAS-P)可减少心房传导延迟。我们采用组织多普勒成像(TDI)的应变率评估窦性心律激活时、IAS-P或RAA-P情况下的心房收缩。
52例因窦房结疾病植入永久起搏器的患者纳入本研究。23例接受IAS-P,29例接受RAA-P。测量从舒张末期到舒张末期峰值应变率的时间,并根据心电图RR间期进行校正。将其定义为从舒张末期到舒张末期峰值应变率的时间(TSRc),比较每组在窦性心律激活和起搏心律时三个部位最大和最小TSRc之间的差值(ΔTSRc)。
除起搏P波持续时间外,两组患者的一般特征和标准超声心动图参数无显著差异。IAS-P组的持续时间明显短于RAA-P组(95±34 vs 138±41;P = 0.001)。RAA-P组窦性心律激活和起搏心律时TSRc有显著差异(36.3±35.7 vs 61.6±36.3;P = 0.003),而IAS-P组未观察到显著差异(25.4±12.1 vs 27.7±14.7;无显著性差异)。随访期间(平均2.4±0.7年),两组阵发性心房颤动(AF)转为永久性AF的发生率无显著差异。
与RAA-P相比,IAS-P减少了心房TDI的收缩延迟;然而,在本研究中它并未有助于降低AF的发生率。