Ji Ling, Hu Wenzhi, Yao Jing, Yu Jian, Chen Chun, Yong Yonghong, Zhou Lei, Xu Di
Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Echocardiography. 2010 Nov;27(10):1219-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2010.01221.x.
Velocity vector imaging (VVI) allows noninvasive measurement of left ventricular (LV) strain and rotation angle-independently. We investigated strain, rotation and myocardial synchrony when pacing at different sites in the right ventricle to determine which site yields the most physiological pacing, as determined with VVI imaging.
Thirty-one patients with normal LV function referred for elective electrophysiology exam were used in this study. Catheters (6F quadripolar) were positioned in the right atrium, right ventricular apex, right ventricular outflow tract, and His bundle after electrophysiology exam was done. Regional and global LV circumferential strain (CS), radial strain (RS), and LV rotation of LV short-axis measurements were obtained. Two dyssynchrony parameters (AS-P delay and SDt(6S)) of CS and RS were obtained. Compare these values among each pacing, respectively.
CS, RS, and twist, which represent the LV systolic function, were significantly reduced in RVOT pacing and RVA pacing than RA pacing. Two dyssynchrony parameters (AS-P delay and SDt(6S)) were significantly longer in response to RVOT or RVA pacing compared to RA pacing. No significant differences were found between RVOT pacing and RVA pacing. CS and RS were obviously reduced in the regions surrounding the pacing site. There was no significant difference in CS, RS, twist, and mechanical dyssynchrony parameters when comparing His and RA pacing.
Among these alternate right ventricular pacing locations, His bundle pacing is most like physiological pacing. Both RVOT pacing and RVA pacing worsen the normal LV systolic function with regard to strain, twist, and mechanical dyssynchrony along the LV short axis.
速度向量成像(VVI)可独立进行左心室(LV)应变和旋转角度的无创测量。我们研究了在右心室不同部位起搏时的应变、旋转及心肌同步性,以确定通过VVI成像判断哪个部位产生的起搏最接近生理状态。
本研究纳入31例左心室功能正常且因择期电生理检查就诊的患者。在完成电生理检查后,将导管(6F四极导管)置于右心房、右心室心尖、右心室流出道和希氏束。获取左心室短轴测量的局部和整体圆周应变(CS)、径向应变(RS)以及左心室旋转情况。获得CS和RS的两个不同步参数(AS-P延迟和SDt(6S))。分别比较每种起搏方式下的这些值。
与右心房起搏相比,右心室流出道起搏和右心室心尖起搏时,代表左心室收缩功能的CS、RS和扭转明显降低。与右心房起搏相比,右心室流出道或右心室心尖起搏时,两个不同步参数(AS-P延迟和SDt(6S))明显延长。右心室流出道起搏和右心室心尖起搏之间未发现显著差异。起搏部位周围区域的CS和RS明显降低。比较希氏束起搏和右心房起搏时,CS、RS、扭转和机械不同步参数无显著差异。
在这些右心室替代起搏部位中,希氏束起搏最接近生理起搏。右心室流出道起搏和右心室心尖起搏在应变、扭转以及左心室短轴方向的机械不同步方面均会使正常左心室收缩功能恶化。