Lu Xing-hua, Qin Ming-wei, Wen Xiao-heng, Liu Wei, Shi Ji-hua, Qian Jia-ming, Li Jing-nan
Department of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing 100730, China.
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Sep;49(9):746-9.
To investigate the diagnostic value of capsule endoscopy (CE), CT enterography (CTE), ileocolonoscopy and small bowel follow through (SBFT) for small bowel Crohn's disease (CD).
Fifty-seven consecutive patients with CD underwent ileocolonoscopy, CTE, CE, and SBFT. It included the presence of the following symptoms and signs: abdominal pain, weight loss, diarrhea, fever and positive fecal occult blood test. The location and the characteristics of intestinal and extra-intestinal lesions detected by four techniques were compared. The proportions of patients with positive findings using each examination were compared.
Of the 57 patients, 50 underwent ileocolonoscopy, terminal ileum lesion was found in 33 patients (66.00%), the remaining 17 (34.0%) were normal; among 34 patients who had CTE, 29 of small bowel lesion were found (85.29%); CE were performed in 27 patients, due to prolonged gastric transit one time, the capsule did not reach the cecum in one patient during battery lifetime. CE showed small bowel lesion in 26 patients (96.30%); SBFT was performed in 39 patients and 26 of small bowel lesion were detected (66.67%). CE had the highest diagnostic yield for CD and ileocolonoscopy had the lowest, and there were statistically significant difference among the 4 examinations (P = 0.006). The combined positive rates of two methods were: CE + CTE 92.86% (13/14), SBFT + CTE 90.91% (20/22), CE + ileocolonoscopy 95.65% (22/23), CE + SBFT 100% (17/17), ileocolonoscopy + CTE 89.66% (26/29), ileocolonoscopy + SBFT 77.78% (28/36), but there were no significant differences between each two examinations.
CE, CTE have a higher yield in depicting mild to moderate finding of CD than SBFT. CE is better for assessing early mucosal disease, whereas CTE is better for detecting transmural and extraluminal abnormalities. Most important, CE plus CTE may depict nonobstructive CD of the small bowel when conventional techniques such as ileocolonoscopy or SBFT have negative or inconclusive finding. CE provides us explanations for the symptoms of patients, decision to follow up or therapy.
探讨胶囊内镜(CE)、CT小肠造影(CTE)、回结肠镜检查及小肠钡剂造影(SBFT)对小肠克罗恩病(CD)的诊断价值。
57例连续性CD患者接受了回结肠镜检查、CTE、CE及SBFT检查。纳入存在以下症状和体征的患者:腹痛、体重减轻、腹泻、发热及粪便潜血试验阳性。比较四种检查方法所发现的肠道及肠外病变的部位和特征。比较每种检查方法阳性结果的患者比例。
57例患者中,50例行回结肠镜检查,33例(66.00%)发现末端回肠病变,其余17例(34.0%)正常;34例行CTE检查,29例(85.29%)发现小肠病变;27例行CE检查,因1例胃排空时间延长,1例在电池寿命期内胶囊未到达盲肠。CE检查发现26例(96.30%)小肠病变;39例行SBFT检查,26例(66.67%)发现小肠病变。CE对CD的诊断率最高,回结肠镜检查最低,4种检查方法之间差异有统计学意义(P = 0.006)。两种方法联合的阳性率分别为:CE + CTE 92.86%(13/14), SBFT + CTE 90.91%(20/22), CE + 回结肠镜检查95.65%(22/23), CE + SBFT 100%(17/17), 回结肠镜检查 + CTE 89.66%(26/29), 回结肠镜检查 + SBFT 77.78%(28/36),但两两检查之间差异无统计学意义。
CE、CTE对CD轻至中度病变的显示率高于SBFT。CE更适合评估早期黏膜病变,而CTE更适合检测透壁及腔外异常。最重要的是,当回结肠镜检查或SBFT等传统检查结果为阴性或不确定时,CE加CTE可能显示小肠非梗阻性CD。CE可为患者的症状、随访或治疗决策提供依据。