Suppr超能文献

胶囊内镜在疑似克罗恩病方面优于小肠造影检查,与回结肠镜检查相当。

Capsule endoscopy is superior to small-bowel follow-through and equivalent to ileocolonoscopy in suspected Crohn's disease.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona.

Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology and Department of Gastroenterology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Apr;12(4):609-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.09.028. Epub 2013 Sep 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Evaluation of the small intestine for inflammation has traditionally relied on small-bowel follow-through (SBFT), but multiple studies have demonstrated its low diagnostic accuracy. Capsule endoscopy (CE) transmits high-quality images of the small intestinal mucosa; it can be used to visualize the entire length of the small bowel and much of the mucosa. We compared the diagnostic yields of CE vs SBFT in a prospective study of patients with suspected small-bowel Crohn's disease.

METHODS

Eighty patients with signs and/or symptoms of small-bowel Crohn's disease (age, 10-65 years) underwent CE, followed by SBFT and ileocolonoscopy. Readers were blinded to other test results. The primary outcome was the diagnostic yield for inflammatory lesions found with CE before ileocolonoscopy compared with SBFT and ileocolonoscopy. A secondary outcome was the incremental diagnostic yield of CE compared with ileocolonoscopy and CE compared with SBFT.

RESULTS

The combination of CE and ileocolonoscopy detected 107 of 110 inflammatory lesions (97.3%), whereas the combination of SBFT and ileocolonoscopy detected only 63 lesions (57.3%) (P < .001). The diagnostic yield of CE compared with ileocolonoscopy was not different (P = .09). The diagnostic yield was higher for CE than for SBFT (P < .001). Of the 80 patients with suspected Crohn's disease, 25 (31.3%) had the diagnosis confirmed. Eleven were diagnosed by CE findings alone and 5 by ileocolonoscopy findings alone. In the remaining 9 patients, diagnostic findings were identified by at least 2 of the 3 modalities. No diagnoses were made on the basis of SBFT findings alone.

CONCLUSIONS

CE was better than SBFT and equivalent to ileocolonoscopy in detecting small-bowel inflammation. Although ileocolonoscopy remains the initial diagnostic test of choice, CE is safe and can establish the diagnosis of Crohn's disease in patients when ileocolonoscopy results are negative or the terminal ileum cannot be evaluated. ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT00487396.

摘要

背景与目的

传统上,小肠炎症的评估依赖于小肠钡剂造影(SBFT),但多项研究表明其诊断准确性较低。胶囊内镜(CE)可传输高质量的小肠黏膜图像,能用于观察整个小肠和大部分黏膜。我们在一项疑似小肠克罗恩病患者的前瞻性研究中,比较了 CE 与 SBFT 的诊断效果。

方法

80 例有小肠克罗恩病体征和/或症状的患者(年龄 10-65 岁)接受 CE 检查,然后进行 SBFT 和结肠镜检查。读者对其他检查结果不知情。主要终点是在结肠镜检查前,CE 对炎症性病变的诊断效果与 SBFT 和结肠镜检查的比较。次要终点是 CE 相对于结肠镜检查和 SBFT 的诊断增量效果。

结果

CE 联合结肠镜检查发现了 110 处炎症病变中的 107 处(97.3%),而 SBFT 联合结肠镜检查仅发现了 63 处病变(57.3%)(P <.001)。CE 与结肠镜检查的诊断效果无差异(P =.09)。CE 比 SBFT 的诊断效果更高(P <.001)。80 例疑似克罗恩病的患者中,25 例(31.3%)确诊。11 例单独通过 CE 检查发现,5 例单独通过结肠镜检查发现。在其余 9 例患者中,至少有 2 种方法发现了诊断性结果。没有仅根据 SBFT 结果做出的诊断。

结论

CE 在检测小肠炎症方面优于 SBFT,与结肠镜检查相当。尽管结肠镜检查仍是首选的初始诊断检查,但当结肠镜检查结果为阴性或无法评估末端回肠时,CE 是安全的,可用于诊断克罗恩病。临床试验注册号:NCT00487396。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验