Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, PO Box 6492, St Kilda Road, Central Melbourne, VIC 8008, Australia.
Lancet. 2010 Dec 4;376(9756):1903-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62039-9. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
Activation of renal sympathetic nerves is key to pathogenesis of essential hypertension. We aimed to assess effectiveness and safety of catheter-based renal denervation for reduction of blood pressure in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension.
In this multicentre, prospective, randomised trial, patients who had a baseline systolic blood pressure of 160 mm Hg or more (≥150 mm Hg for patients with type 2 diabetes), despite taking three or more antihypertensive drugs, were randomly allocated in a one-to-one ratio to undergo renal denervation with previous treatment or to maintain previous treatment alone (control group) at 24 participating centres. Randomisation was done with sealed envelopes. Data analysers were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary effectiveness endpoint was change in seated office-based measurement of systolic blood pressure at 6 months. Primary analysis included all patients remaining in follow-up at 6 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00888433.
106 (56%) of 190 patients screened for eligibility were randomly allocated to renal denervation (n=52) or control (n=54) groups between June 9, 2009, and Jan 15, 2010. 49 (94%) of 52 patients who underwent renal denervation and 51 (94%) of 54 controls were assessed for the primary endpoint at 6 months. Office-based blood pressure measurements in the renal denervation group reduced by 32/12 mm Hg (SD 23/11, baseline of 178/96 mm Hg, p<0·0001), whereas they did not differ from baseline in the control group (change of 1/0 mm Hg [21/10], baseline of 178/97 mm Hg, p=0·77 systolic and p=0·83 diastolic). Between-group differences in blood pressure at 6 months were 33/11 mm Hg (p<0·0001). At 6 months, 41 (84%) of 49 patients who underwent renal denervation had a reduction in systolic blood pressure of 10 mm Hg or more, compared with 18 (35%) of 51 controls (p<0·0001). We noted no serious procedure-related or device-related complications and occurrence of adverse events did not differ between groups; one patient who had renal denervation had possible progression of an underlying atherosclerotic lesion, but required no treatment.
Catheter-based renal denervation can safely be used to substantially reduce blood pressure in treatment-resistant hypertensive patients.
Ardian.
肾交感神经的激活是原发性高血压发病机制的关键。我们旨在评估基于导管的肾脏去神经支配降低治疗抵抗性高血压患者血压的有效性和安全性。
在这项多中心、前瞻性、随机试验中,基线收缩压为 160mmHg 或以上(2 型糖尿病患者为 150mmHg 或以上)、尽管服用了三种或更多种降压药物的患者,以 1:1 的比例随机分配接受肾去神经支配治疗(治疗组)或单独维持先前的治疗(对照组),共 24 个参与中心。随机分组采用密封信封进行。数据分析员未对治疗分配进行盲法分析。主要有效性终点为 6 个月时坐位办公血压测量的变化。主要分析包括所有在 6 个月时仍在随访的患者。这项试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT00888433。
在 2009 年 6 月 9 日至 2010 年 1 月 15 日期间,对 190 名符合条件的患者进行了筛选,其中 106 名(56%)被随机分配至肾去神经支配组(n=52)或对照组(n=54)。在 6 个月时,52 名接受肾去神经支配治疗的患者中有 49 名(94%)和 54 名对照组中有 51 名(94%)接受了主要终点评估。肾去神经支配组的诊室血压测量值降低了 32/12mmHg(SD 23/11,基线为 178/96mmHg,p<0.0001),而对照组的血压与基线相比没有差异(变化 1/0mmHg[21/10],基线为 178/97mmHg,p=0.77 收缩压和 p=0.83 舒张压)。6 个月时两组间的血压差异为 33/11mmHg(p<0.0001)。在 6 个月时,与对照组相比,接受肾去神经支配治疗的 49 名患者中有 41 名(84%)的收缩压降低了 10mmHg 或更多,而对照组中只有 51 名(35%)(p<0.0001)。我们没有注意到与治疗相关的严重程序或设备相关的并发症,而且两组之间的不良事件发生率没有差异;一名接受肾去神经支配治疗的患者可能出现了潜在的动脉粥样硬化病变进展,但无需治疗。
基于导管的肾脏去神经支配可安全地用于显著降低治疗抵抗性高血压患者的血压。
Ardian。