Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University, 3970 Reservoir Rd NW, Washington, DC 20007, United States.
J Neurosci Methods. 2011 Jan 15;194(2):297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.11.004. Epub 2010 Nov 17.
Flexible goal-directed behavior has been studied across species using reinforcer devaluation tasks, in which subjects form associations between specific stimuli (cues) and specific reinforcer(s). The reinforcer is subsequently devalued by selective satiation or taste aversion. Following devaluation, subjects adjust their responding to the cues reflecting the new value of the reinforcer. Tasks currently used in rats differ in several ways from tasks used in monkeys and this may explain contrasting results between the two species. To address one of the differences, we developed a rat task independent of spatial cues. It employs two visual cues presented simultaneously, changing left and right positions pseudorandomly. Each cue predicts one of two food reinforcers. Rats were trained to lever press in response to the two visual cues. Subsequently, they were satiated on one of the foods followed by an extinction test where in each trial they could choose to respond to one of the two cues, one predicting the devalued reinforcer and the other the non-devalued. This procedure was repeated later with the alternative food devalued. The rats adjusted their responding by choosing the cue predicting the devalued food significantly less (p<0.05) than the alternative cue. These results show that rats can discriminate two visual stimuli presented simultaneously, devalue two different foods by selective satiation, and transfer the new value to the visual cues. Discrimination of the visual cues is not aided by spatial cues, thereby eliminating a major difference between the instrumental tasks used in rats and the task used in monkeys.
灵活的目标导向行为已在多个物种中使用强化物贬值任务进行研究,在该任务中,受试者将特定刺激(线索)与特定强化物(奖励)之间形成关联。随后,通过选择性饱和或味觉厌恶使强化物贬值。贬值后,受试者会根据新的奖励价值调整对线索的反应。目前在大鼠中使用的任务与在猴子中使用的任务在几个方面有所不同,这可能解释了这两个物种之间的对比结果。为了解决其中的一个差异,我们开发了一种与空间线索无关的大鼠任务。它使用两个同时呈现的视觉线索,随机改变左右位置。每个线索预测两种食物奖励之一。大鼠被训练对两个视觉线索进行按压反应。随后,它们对其中一种食物进行饱和处理,然后进行消退测试,在每次试验中,它们可以选择对两个线索中的一个做出反应,一个预测贬值的奖励,另一个预测非贬值的奖励。这个过程后来用另一种食物进行了重复。大鼠通过选择预测贬值食物的线索明显减少(p<0.05)来调整其反应,而不是选择其他线索。这些结果表明,大鼠可以区分同时呈现的两个视觉刺激,通过选择性饱和来贬值两种不同的食物,并将新的价值转移到视觉线索上。视觉线索的辨别不受空间线索的帮助,从而消除了大鼠中使用的工具任务与猴子中使用的任务之间的主要差异。