• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经法律的当前问题。

Current issues in neurolaw.

机构信息

De Caro & Kaplen LLP, 427 Bedford Road, Pleasantville, NY 10570, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2010 Dec;33(4):915-30. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2010.09.002.

DOI:10.1016/j.psc.2010.09.002
PMID:21093686
Abstract

Traumatic brain injury has received significant attention in recent years. Advances in diagnosis and management have resulted in opportunities to improve patient outcomes; however, controversies in diagnosis and management have resulted in increased interactions between the medical and legal communities. This article highlights some of the areas of controversy in traumatic brain injury litigation with the hope that synchronous resolutions of both legal and medical issues will ultimately benefit patient care. It is imperative that the neuroscience community engage the legal community to facilitate an understanding of the issues and their ramifications. Proactive communication and understanding between medical and legal specialties offer the potential to maximize efficiencies in our health care and legal systems.

摘要

近年来,创伤性脑损伤受到了广泛关注。在诊断和治疗方面的进展为改善患者预后提供了机会;然而,在诊断和治疗方面的争议也导致了医疗和法律界之间的互动增加。本文重点介绍了创伤性脑损伤诉讼中的一些争议领域,希望最终能同时解决法律和医学问题,从而造福于患者的护理。神经科学界必须与法律界合作,以了解这些问题及其影响,这一点至关重要。医疗和法律专业之间的积极沟通和理解有可能最大限度地提高我们的医疗和法律体系的效率。

相似文献

1
Current issues in neurolaw.神经法律的当前问题。
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2010 Dec;33(4):915-30. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2010.09.002.
2
Cognitive neuroscience and the law.认知神经科学与法律。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006 Apr;16(2):130-4. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.03.011. Epub 2006 Mar 24.
3
Neurolaw: the big question.神经法学:重大问题。
Am J Bioeth. 2008 Jan;8(1):21-2; discussion W1-4. doi: 10.1080/15265160701828485.
4
[The responsibility of the emergency service physician and patient consent to treatment and hospitalization].[急诊医生的职责以及患者对治疗和住院的同意]
Przegl Lek. 1997;54(6):449-51.
5
NIH Roundtable on Opportunities to Advance Research on Neurologic and Psychiatric Emergencies.NIH 圆桌会议:探讨推进神经和精神急症研究的机会。
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Nov;56(5):551-64. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.06.562.
6
The role of the radiologist in the management of politrauma patients.放射科医生在多发伤患者管理中的作用。
Eur J Radiol. 2006 Sep;59(3):315-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.04.021. Epub 2006 Jun 19.
7
Beyond COBRA: the next emergency medicine battleground.超越《综合预算协调法案》:急诊医学的下一个战场。
Resid Staff Physician. 1990 Mar;36(3):31-2, 34-5.
8
The emergency department medical director.急诊科主任
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1987 Feb;5(1):1-29.
9
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.政策与实践:医疗和教育环境中处方治疗与耐用医疗设备的比较
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063.
10
Mild traumatic brain injury in the pediatric population: the role of the pediatrician in routine follow-up.小儿群体中的轻度创伤性脑损伤:儿科医生在常规随访中的作用。
J Trauma. 2010 Jun;68(6):1396-400. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181cf7d1b.