• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康成年劳动者的流感疫苗:是卫生部门还是雇主的问题?

Influenza vaccine for healthy adult workers: an issue for health authorities or employers?

机构信息

CESAV, Centre of Health Economics, Mario Negri Institute, Via Camozzi, 3 c/o Villa Camozzi, 24020 Ranica (Bergamo), Italy.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2011 Sep;102(1):89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.10.011. Epub 2010 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.10.011
PMID:21093952
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To contribute to the debate whether extending public coverage of influenza vaccination to healthy workers is cost-effective, particularly in the perspective of EU countries.

METHODS

First, we reviewed the recent international literature on the extension of vaccination to subjects aged 50-64 years in highly developed countries. Second, we estimated the broad economic impact of influenza vaccination on the Italian healthy adult working population. Finally, we ran a pilot observational study to assess the healthcare and labour outcomes of influenza vaccination on the employees of our organization.

RESULTS

The methodological weaknesses of the studies reviewed, all built on models, undermine the credibility of their optimistic results. The more cautious the model design, the less favourable the final results, as our conservative analysis on the Italian setting confirmed. The only common result was a steady relationship between potential vaccination benefits and indirect costs of absenteeism from work. This "modelling-based evidence" was confirmed by our internal survey: vaccinated workers showed less tendency to stay at home during influenza-like illness episodes and their relapses.

CONCLUSIONS

The economic advantage of extending public influenza vaccination to healthy adult workers is still uncertain and mainly relates to the indirect costs of productivity losses, making the extension strategy more a labour than a health issue.

摘要

目的

为了探讨在欧盟国家,将流感疫苗接种范围扩大到健康工作者是否具有成本效益,特别是从角度。

方法

首先,我们回顾了最近关于在高度发达的国家将疫苗接种范围扩大到 50-64 岁人群的国际文献。其次,我们估计了流感疫苗接种对意大利健康成年劳动人口的广泛经济影响。最后,我们进行了一项试点观察性研究,以评估我们组织员工流感疫苗接种对医疗保健和劳动力的影响。

结果

所审查的研究方法上的弱点,都建立在模型的基础上,削弱了其乐观结果的可信度。模型设计越谨慎,最终结果就越不利,正如我们对意大利情况的保守分析所证实的那样。唯一的共同结果是潜在疫苗接种效益与工作缺勤的间接成本之间存在稳定的关系。这一“基于模型的证据”得到了我们内部调查的证实:接种疫苗的工人在流感样疾病发作期间和康复期间呆在家里的倾向较小。

结论

将公共流感疫苗接种范围扩大到健康成年劳动者的经济效益仍不确定,主要与生产力损失的间接成本有关,这使得扩大接种策略更多地成为劳动力问题而不是健康问题。

相似文献

1
Influenza vaccine for healthy adult workers: an issue for health authorities or employers?健康成年劳动者的流感疫苗:是卫生部门还是雇主的问题?
Health Policy. 2011 Sep;102(1):89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.10.011. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
2
The effectiveness of vaccination against influenza in healthy, working adults.健康在职成年人接种流感疫苗的有效性。
N Engl J Med. 1995 Oct 5;333(14):889-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199510053331401.
3
[Influenza vaccination of hospital healthcare staff from the perspective of the employer: a positive balance].从雇主角度看医院医护人员的流感疫苗接种:收益大于成本
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:A1188.
4
Establishing the health and economic impact of influenza vaccination within the European Union 25 countries.确定流感疫苗接种在欧盟25个国家内对健康和经济的影响。
Vaccine. 2006 Nov 17;24(47-48):6812-22. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.07.042. Epub 2006 Aug 4.
5
Influenza vaccination in healthy working adults in Russia: observational study of effectiveness and return on investment for the employer.俄罗斯健康成年劳动者中的流感疫苗接种:雇主视角下的有效性和投资回报观察性研究。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011 Mar 1;9(2):89-99. doi: 10.2165/11538680-000000000-00000.
6
[Assessment of efficacy and economic impact of an influenza vaccination campaign in the personnel of a health care setting].[医疗机构人员流感疫苗接种活动的效果及经济影响评估]
Med Lav. 2005 Nov-Dec;96(6):483-9.
7
A worksite influenza immunization program. Impact on lost work days, health care utilization, and health care spending.一项工作场所流感免疫计划。对误工天数、医疗保健利用及医疗保健支出的影响。
AAOHN J. 1999 Jul;47(7):301-9.
8
[Influenza vaccination of nurses in an Italian pediatric hospital: effects on absenteeism and on costs, factors associated with vaccine uptake and analysis of personal motivations. A prospective cohort study].[意大利一家儿科医院护士的流感疫苗接种:对缺勤率和成本的影响、与疫苗接种相关的因素以及个人动机分析。一项前瞻性队列研究]
Assist Inferm Ric. 2007 Jan-Mar;26(1):5-13.
9
Vaccination versus treatment of influenza in working adults: a cost-effectiveness analysis.在职成年人中流感疫苗接种与治疗的比较:一项成本效益分析。
Am J Med. 2005 Jan;118(1):68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.03.044.
10
Cost-effectiveness of live attenuated influenza vaccine versus inactivated influenza vaccine among children aged 24-59 months in the United States.美国24至59个月大儿童中减毒活流感疫苗与灭活流感疫苗的成本效益
Vaccine. 2008 Jun 2;26(23):2841-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.03.046. Epub 2008 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The economic burden of influenza among adults aged 18 to 64: A systematic literature review.成年人(18-64 岁)流感的经济负担:系统文献综述。
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2022 May;16(3):376-385. doi: 10.1111/irv.12963. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
2
Planning influenza vaccination programs: a cost benefit model.规划流感疫苗接种计划:成本效益模型。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2012 Jul 26;10(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-10-10.
3
To model or not to model: lessons from two vaccinations.
Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Jun;12(3):189-91. doi: 10.1007/s10198-011-0298-y.