University Hospital of Montpellier, France.
Clin Chim Acta. 2011 Feb 20;412(5-6):430-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2010.11.012. Epub 2010 Nov 19.
From the wide range of methods currently available for genotyping, we wished to identify a quick, reliable and affordable approach for routine use in our laboratory for LTA+252 C>T SNP screening.
We set up and compared three genotyping methods for SNP detection: restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), tetra primer amplification refractory mutation system PCR (TPAP) and unlabeled probe melting analysis (UPMA). The SNP model used was LTA+252 C>T, a cytokine gene polymorphism that has been associated with response to treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. The study was performed using 46 samples from healthy Caucasian volunteers.
Allele and genotype distribution was similar to that previously described in the same population. All three genotyping methods showed good reproducibility and are suitable for a medium scale throughput molecular platform. UPMA was the most cost effective, reliable and safe method since it required the shortest technician time, could be performed in a single closed tube and involved automatic data analysis.
This work is the first to compare these three genotyping techniques and provides evidence for UPMA being the method of choice for LTA+252 C>T SNP genotyping.
从目前可用的多种基因分型方法中,我们希望在实验室中找到一种快速、可靠且经济实惠的方法,用于常规的 LTA+252 C>T SNP 筛查。
我们建立并比较了三种用于 SNP 检测的基因分型方法:限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)、四引物扩增受阻突变系统 PCR(TPAP)和非标记探针熔解分析(UPMA)。所使用的 SNP 模型为 LTA+252 C>T,这是一种细胞因子基因多态性,与类风湿关节炎的治疗反应有关。该研究使用了 46 名来自健康白种人志愿者的样本。
等位基因和基因型分布与同一人群之前的描述相似。三种基因分型方法均显示出良好的可重复性,适用于中等规模的高通量分子平台。UPMA 是最具成本效益、可靠和安全的方法,因为它需要的技术人员时间最短,可以在单个封闭管中进行,并且涉及自动数据分析。
这项工作首次比较了这三种基因分型技术,并为 UPMA 成为 LTA+252 C>T SNP 基因分型的首选方法提供了证据。