Suppr超能文献

联合螺内酯-β受体阻滞剂±依那普利治疗对有阵发性心房颤动史患者发生有症状的心房颤动发作的影响(SPIR-AF 研究)。

Effect of combined spironolactone-β-blocker ± enalapril treatment on occurrence of symptomatic atrial fibrillation episodes in patients with a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (SPIR-AF study).

机构信息

Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2010 Dec 1;106(11):1609-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.07.037. Epub 2010 Oct 14.

Abstract

Angiotensin II and aldosterone are key factors responsible for the structural and neurohormonal remodeling of the atria and ventricles in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the antiarrhythmic effects of spironolactone compared to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with recurrent AF. A cohort of 164 consecutive patients (mean age 66 years, 87 men), with an average 4-year history of recurrent AF episodes, was enrolled in a prospective, randomized, 12-month trial with 4 treatment arms: group A, spironolactone, enalapril, and a β blocker; group B, spironolactone and a β blocker; group C, enalapril plus a β blocker; and group D, a β blocker alone. The primary end point of the trial was the presence of symptomatic AF episodes documented on the electrocardiogram. At 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12 months, a significant (p < 0.001) reduction had occurred in the incidence of AF episodes in both spironolactone-treated groups (group A, spironolactone, enalapril, and a β blocker; and group B, spironolactone plus a β blocker) compared to the incidence in patients treated with enalapril and a β blocker (group C) or a β blocker alone (group D). No significant difference was seen in AF recurrences between patients taking spironolactone and a β blocker with (group A) and without (group B) enalapril. No significant differences were found in the systolic or diastolic blood pressure or heart rate among the groups before and after 1 year of follow-up. In conclusion, combined spironolactone plus β-blocker treatment might be a simple and valuable option in preventing AF episodes in patients with normal left ventricular function and a history of refractory paroxysmal AF.

摘要

血管紧张素 II 和醛固酮是导致心房颤动 (AF) 患者心房和心室结构和神经激素重塑的关键因素。本研究旨在评估螺内酯与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂相比在复发性 AF 患者中的抗心律失常作用。一项连续 164 例患者(平均年龄 66 岁,87 名男性)的队列研究,平均有 4 年的复发性 AF 发作史,被纳入一项前瞻性、随机、为期 12 个月的试验,分为 4 个治疗组:A 组,螺内酯、依那普利和β受体阻滞剂;B 组,螺内酯和β受体阻滞剂;C 组,依那普利加β受体阻滞剂;D 组,仅用β受体阻滞剂。试验的主要终点是心电图记录的有症状的 AF 发作。在 3、6、9 和 12 个月时,与依那普利和β受体阻滞剂(C 组)或β受体阻滞剂(D 组)治疗的患者相比,螺内酯治疗组(A 组,螺内酯、依那普利和β受体阻滞剂;B 组,螺内酯加β受体阻滞剂)AF 发作的发生率显著(p<0.001)降低。螺内酯加β受体阻滞剂(A 组)与无依那普利(B 组)相比,AF 复发无显著差异。在 1 年随访前后,各组之间的收缩压或舒张压或心率均无显著差异。总之,对于左心室功能正常且有难治性阵发性 AF 病史的患者,联合螺内酯加β受体阻滞剂治疗可能是预防 AF 发作的一种简单而有价值的选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验