Suppr超能文献

氟伏沙明与劳拉西泮治疗全科医疗中混合性焦虑和抑郁的多中心双盲对照试验。

A multicentre double-blind comparative trial of fluvoxamine versus lorazepam in mixed anxiety and depression treated in general practice.

作者信息

Laws D, Ashford J J, Anstee J A

机构信息

Medical Department, Duphar Laboratories Ltd., West End, Southampton, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1990 Feb;81(2):185-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb06476.x.

Abstract

Fluvoxamine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, was compared with lorazepam in a multicentre double-blind, parallel group study in 112 general practice patients with mixed anxiety and depression. For inclusion, patients were required to have minimum baseline scores of 21 on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and 11 on the Clinical Anxiety Scale (CAS). Treatment was for 6 weeks. There were no significant differences between treatments at any point except in an elderly subgroup in whom anxiety improved more rapidly with lorazepam. There were significant improvements in MADRS, CAS and global ratings compared with baseline at all subsequent assessments. Improvement continued during the whole treatment period. Lorazepam produced more sedation, whilst fluvoxamine produced significantly more nausea and vomiting; this was usually early in onset and, if tolerated, resolved during the course of the study. As it is now widely recognized that benzodiazepines should only be given in short courses of 2-4 weeks, the continued improvement up to 6 weeks has implications regarding choice of treatment.

摘要

氟伏沙明是一种选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂,在一项针对112名患有混合性焦虑和抑郁的全科门诊患者的多中心双盲平行组研究中,它与劳拉西泮进行了对比。纳入研究的患者在蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)上的基线得分至少为21分,在临床焦虑量表(CAS)上的基线得分至少为11分。治疗为期6周。除了一个老年亚组(在该亚组中,劳拉西泮使焦虑症状改善得更快)外,在任何时间点两种治疗方法之间均无显著差异。与基线相比,在所有后续评估中,MADRS、CAS及总体评分均有显著改善。在整个治疗期间改善持续存在。劳拉西泮产生的镇静作用更强,而氟伏沙明产生的恶心和呕吐显著更多;这种情况通常在早期出现,如果能够耐受,在研究过程中会缓解。由于现在人们广泛认识到苯二氮䓬类药物仅应在2至4周的短疗程中使用,因此长达6周的持续改善对治疗选择具有启示意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验