Suppr超能文献

广泛性焦虑障碍中的非器质性失眠。2. 采用临床、多导睡眠图和脑电图描记法,对比研究劳拉西泮加苯海拉明(Somnium)与单独使用劳拉西泮时的睡眠、觉醒、日间警觉性及焦虑情况。

Nonorganic insomnia in generalized anxiety disorder. 2. Comparative studies on sleep, awakening, daytime vigilance and anxiety under lorazepam plus diphenhydramine (Somnium) versus lorazepam alone, utilizing clinical, polysomnographic and EEG mapping methods.

作者信息

Saletu B, Saletu-Zyhlarz G, Anderer P, Brandstätter N, Frey R, Gruber G, Klösch G, Mandl M, Grünberger J, Linzmayer L

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Neuropsychobiology. 1997;36(3):130-52. doi: 10.1159/000119374.

Abstract

Previous human pharmacological and toxicological studies demonstrated advantages of the combination drug Somnium [SOM, lorazepam (LOR) 1 mg plus diphenhydramine 25 mg] over 1 mg LOR alone, as it showed synergistic effects in hypnotic properties and antagonistic effects in regard to toxicity. In the present double-blind, parallel-group study, hypnotic and anxiolytic effects of SOM were studied in 44 patients with non-organic insomnia related to mild generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), as compared with LOR alone. After a placebo run-in phase of 1 week, they received active treatment (1 tablet SOM or LOR 1 mg) for 4 weeks and thereafter placebo again for 1 week. Clinical evaluations included the physician's general assessment of efficacy, tolerance and adverse effects, the Hamilton anxiety rating scale (HAMA), the Zung self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and depression scale, the withdrawal symptom scale (WSS), hematology and blood chemistry. Sleep laboratory evaluations included objective and subjective sleep and awakening quality, measured by polysomnography, self-rating of sleep and awakening quality (SSA) and a psychometric test battery in the morning, as well as measurement of daytime brain function, objectivated by EEG mapping. Physicians' global evaluation of insomnia demonstrated no changes in the pre-drug placebo period, moderate improvement under both drugs, with a marginal advantage of SOM over LOR in the first 2 weeks, and a return to pre-drug values in the post-drug placebo period. Anxiety improved in observer ratings (HAMA) under both drugs, in self-rating (SAS) under the combination drug only, with the scores returning to pre-drug placebo values after post-drug placebo substitution. There were no significant findings in the self-rating depression scale and the WSS, with the exception of an improvement in the WSS score 4 weeks after SOM, as compared with pre-drug placebo. There were no rebound phenomena. Both drugs were well tolerated-in regard to both adverse effects and laboratory findings. Confirmatory statistics on the polysomnographically recorded target variable latency to sleep onset stage 2 demonstrated a significant shortening of sleep latency after SOM and a significant superiority of the combination drug SOM over LOR after acute dosing, as compared with pre-drug placebo. Descriptive statistics demonstrated further a significant improvement of sleep efficiency and total sleep time after SOM and of wakefulness time and number of awakenings during the total sleep period after both drugs, but no interdrug differences. Sleep architecture remained unchanged. Subjective sleep quality improved with both drugs, morning drowsiness and the total SSA score only with SOM, while LOR was superior to SOM regarding morning somatic complaints. There were neither changes nor interdrug differences in the morning noopsyche. In psychophysiology, critical flicker frequency decreased more under SOM than LOR. After 4 weeks therapy, no significant findings in polysomnography and subjective sleep and awakening were seen, except for an increase in movement time under LOR (tolerance development). In objective awakening quality, psychometry revealed an improvement of reaction time under SOM and a decrease of attention variability and an increase in fine-motor activity under LOR, with an interdrug comparison showing a significant superiority of SOM over LOR in regard to reaction time, reaction time variability and reaction time performance. After placebo substitution, rebound phenomena were seen in polysomnography and subjective sleep and awakening in the 1st night of the SOM group only, which were gone in the 7th placebo night, however. Noopsychic performance remained improved in both groups, with a superiority of SOM to LOR in regard to reaction time and reaction time variability. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

摘要

以往人体药理学和毒理学研究表明,复方药物Somnium[SOM,即1毫克劳拉西泮(LOR)加25毫克苯海拉明]相较于单独使用1毫克LOR具有优势,因为它在催眠特性方面显示出协同作用,在毒性方面显示出拮抗作用。在本双盲、平行组研究中,将SOM与单独使用LOR相比,对44例与轻度广泛性焦虑症(GAD)相关的非器质性失眠患者的催眠和抗焦虑作用进行了研究。在为期1周的安慰剂导入期后,他们接受了4周的积极治疗(1片SOM或1毫克LOR),之后再次接受1周的安慰剂治疗。临床评估包括医生对疗效、耐受性和不良反应的总体评估、汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表(HAMA)、zung自评焦虑量表(SAS)和抑郁量表、撤药症状量表(WSS)、血液学和血液化学检查。睡眠实验室评估包括通过多导睡眠图测量的客观和主观睡眠及觉醒质量、睡眠和觉醒质量自评(SSA)以及早晨的心理测试组,以及通过脑电图映射客观化的白天脑功能测量。医生对失眠的总体评估显示,用药前安慰剂期无变化,两种药物治疗后均有中度改善,前2周SOM略优于LOR,用药后安慰剂期恢复到用药前水平。两种药物治疗后观察者评分(HAMA)中的焦虑均有所改善,仅复方药物治疗后的自评(SAS)中焦虑有所改善,用药后安慰剂替代后评分恢复到用药前安慰剂水平。自评抑郁量表和WSS中无显著发现,但与用药前安慰剂相比,SOM治疗4周后WSS评分有所改善。无反弹现象。两种药物在不良反应和实验室检查结果方面耐受性均良好。对多导睡眠图记录的目标变量入睡至2期睡眠潜伏期的验证性统计显示,与用药前安慰剂相比,SOM给药后睡眠潜伏期显著缩短,急性给药后复方药物SOM优于LOR。描述性统计进一步显示,SOM治疗后睡眠效率和总睡眠时间显著改善,两种药物治疗后总睡眠期间的清醒时间和觉醒次数均显著改善,但药物间无差异。睡眠结构保持不变。两种药物治疗后主观睡眠质量均有所改善,仅SOM治疗后早晨嗜睡和SSA总分有所改善,而LOR在早晨躯体不适方面优于SOM。早晨心理状态无变化,药物间也无差异。在心理生理学方面,SOM治疗下临界闪烁频率的下降幅度大于LOR。治疗4周后,除LOR治疗下运动时间增加(耐受性发展)外,多导睡眠图以及主观睡眠和觉醒方面无显著发现。在客观觉醒质量方面,心理测试显示SOM治疗下反应时间有所改善,LOR治疗下注意力变异性降低,精细运动活动增加,药物间比较显示SOM在反应时间、反应时间变异性和反应时间表现方面显著优于LOR。安慰剂替代后,仅SOM组在第1晚的多导睡眠图以及主观睡眠和觉醒方面出现反弹现象,但在第7晚安慰剂期消失。两组的心理状态表现均保持改善,SOM在反应时间和反应时间变异性方面优于LOR。(摘要截断)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验