Suppr超能文献

在向数字化乳腺摄影过渡中使用既往乳腺 X 线照片:一项性能和成本分析。

Use of prior mammograms in the transition to digital mammography: a performance and cost analysis.

机构信息

Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Jan;81(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.10.025. Epub 2010 Nov 20.

Abstract

Breast screening in Europe is gradually changing from film to digital imaging and reporting of cases. In the transition period prior mammograms (from the preceding screening round) are films thereby potentially causing difficulties in comparison to current digital mammograms. To examine this breast screening performance was measured at a digital mammography workstation with prior mammograms displayed in different formats, and the associated costs calculated. 160 selected difficult cases (41% malignant) were read by eight UK qualified mammography readers in three conditions: with film prior mammograms; with digitised prior mammograms; or without prior mammograms. Lesion location and probability of malignancy were recorded, alongside a decision of whether to recall each case for further tests. JAFROC analysis showed a difference between conditions (p=.006); performance with prior mammograms in either film or digitised formats was superior to that without prior mammograms (p<.05). There was no difference in the performance when the prior mammograms were presented in film or digitised form. The number of benign or normal cases recalled was 26% higher without prior mammograms than with digitised or film prior mammograms (p<.05). This would correspond to an increase in recall rate at the study hospital from 4.3% to 5.5% with no associated increase in cancer detection rate. The cost of this increase was estimated to be £11,581 (€13,666) per 10,000 women screened, which is higher than the cost of digitised (£11,114/€13,115), or film display (£6451/€7612) of the prior mammograms. It is recommended that, where available, prior mammograms are used in the transition to digital breast screening.

摘要

欧洲的乳腺筛查正逐渐从胶片向数字成像和病例报告转变。在过渡时期,前次筛查的乳腺 X 光片(来自前一次筛查)是胶片,因此与当前的数字乳腺 X 光片相比,可能会导致一些困难。为了研究这一问题,我们在数字乳腺摄影工作站上用不同的格式显示前次乳腺 X 光片,对其进行了检测,并计算了相关成本。在三种情况下,160 例(41%为恶性)的有难度的病例由 8 位有资质的英国乳腺 X 光片阅读者进行了阅读:使用胶片的前次乳腺 X 光片;使用数字化的前次乳腺 X 光片;或不使用前次乳腺 X 光片。记录了病变位置和恶性肿瘤的概率,以及对每个病例是否进行召回以进一步检查的决定。JAFROC 分析显示了不同条件下的差异(p=.006);有或没有前次乳腺 X 光片的情况下,使用前次乳腺 X 光片的性能均优于没有前次乳腺 X 光片的情况(p<.05)。前次乳腺 X 光片以胶片或数字化形式呈现时,性能没有差异。与数字化或胶片前次乳腺 X 光片相比,没有前次乳腺 X 光片时,良性或正常病例的召回率高出 26%(p<.05)。这将导致研究医院的召回率从 4.3%增加到 5.5%,而癌症检出率没有增加。估计增加这一比例的成本为 11581 英镑(13666 欧元)/每 10000 名筛查妇女,高于数字化(11114 英镑/13115 欧元)或胶片显示(6451 英镑/7612 欧元)的前次乳腺 X 光片成本。建议在向数字乳腺筛查过渡时,如能提供前次乳腺 X 光片,则使用前次乳腺 X 光片。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验