Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon, Hospital du Bocage, Dijon, France.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Dec;90(6):1779-85. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.07.033.
We performed a systematic and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing a surgical sealant with buttressed staple lines using standard methods. The aim of our meta-analysis was to determine the effectiveness and safety of different techniques to reduce the proportion of patients with prolonged air leakage after pulmonary resection.
We searched the Medline, Embase, Science Direct, Food and Drug Administration, Cochrane controlled trials register, and clinical trial databases for publications between January 1995 and May 2009 that included terms related to prolonged air leak after lung resection. We included randomized controlled trials comparing glue or patch or buttressed staple line with suture or staple in patients undergoing lung resection (wedge resection or lobectomy). The prespecified primary outcome of our meta-analysis was prolonged air leak more than 7 days. Secondary outcomes were the occurrence of adverse effects.
Thirteen trials were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, the trials had allocated 1,335 patients to glue or patch (1,064 patients) or buttress (271 patients) for the prevention of prolonged air leak after lung resection. The type of buttress used to reinforce the staple line was bovine pericardial strips (271 patients). In the control group of all trials for air-leakage management, single or continuous running sutures or staples were used according to the routine of the center. The use of glue or a patch or buttressing compared with control groups (1,335 patients) decreased prolonged air leak more than 7 days. Indeed, the pooled effect size odds ratio was 0.55 (95% confidence interval: 0.386 to 0.79). An I(2) of 0% indicated low between-trial heterogeneity. The funnel-plot asymmetry coefficient was significantly different from zero (asymmetry coefficient -1.23 (95% confidence interval: -2.38 to -0.086; p < 0.04), indicating the presence of publication bias. Neither glue nor a patch nor buttressing influenced the occurrence of postoperative complications such as atelectasis, hemothorax, pneumonia, pneumothorax, and mortality. Eight trials (1,020 patients) showed that, compared with control groups, the use of glue or a patch or buttressing decreased postoperative arrhythmia, which yielded a pooled odds ratio of 0.44 (95% confidence interval: 0.275 to 0.72).
The use of surgical sealants and buttressing decreased the risk of prolonged air leakage and postoperative arrhythmia after pulmonary resection. However, given the possibility of publication bias, the conclusions should be interpreted with caution.
我们采用系统评价和荟萃分析的方法,对使用标准方法比较外科密封剂与加固缝线钉合线的随机对照试验进行了研究。我们的荟萃分析目的是确定不同技术减少肺切除术后发生长时间漏气患者比例的有效性和安全性。
我们检索了 Medline、Embase、Science Direct、美国食品和药物管理局、Cochrane 对照试验注册库和临床试验数据库,以获取 1995 年 1 月至 2009 年 5 月期间发表的与肺切除术后长时间漏气相关的文献。我们纳入了比较肺切除术中使用胶、贴剂或加固缝线钉合线与缝线或缝线钉预防长时间漏气的随机对照试验。我们荟萃分析的预设主要结局是超过 7 天的长时间漏气。次要结局是不良反应的发生。
共有 13 项试验纳入荟萃分析。总的来说,这些试验将 1335 例患者随机分配至胶、贴剂(1064 例)或加固缝线钉合线(271 例)预防肺切除术后长时间漏气。强化缝线钉合线所用的加固物是牛心包条(271 例)。所有试验中,控制组在管理漏气时,根据中心常规使用单或连续缝线或缝线钉。与对照组(1335 例)相比,使用胶、贴剂或加固缝线钉合线可减少超过 7 天的长时间漏气。事实上,汇总效应大小比值比为 0.55(95%置信区间:0.386 至 0.79)。I²值为 0%,表明试验间异质性较低。漏斗图不对称系数显著不同于零(不对称系数-1.23(95%置信区间:-2.38 至-0.086;p<0.04),表明存在发表偏倚。胶、贴剂或加固缝线钉合线均不影响术后并发症(如肺不张、血胸、肺炎、气胸和死亡率)的发生。8 项试验(1020 例患者)表明,与对照组相比,使用胶、贴剂或加固缝线钉合线可减少术后心律失常,汇总比值比为 0.44(95%置信区间:0.275 至 0.72)。
外科密封剂和加固缝线钉合线的使用可降低肺切除术后长时间漏气和术后心律失常的风险。但是,鉴于存在发表偏倚的可能性,应谨慎解释这些结论。