Shaughnessy P W, Schlenker R E, Kramer A M
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, UCHSC, Denver 80222.
Health Serv Res. 1990 Apr;25(1 Pt 1):65-96.
By 1989, more than 1,100 hospitals in rural communities throughout the United States were using hospital beds as swing beds to provide both long-term and acute care. In this study, the quality of long-term care in swing-bed hospitals was compared with the quality of nursing home care, using patient outcomes along with both process and structural measures of quality. Several methodological and conceptual points on measuring and analyzing the quality of long-term care are discussed in this article. Data were analyzed on approximately 2,000 patients in four different primary data samples, three of which were longitudinal involving multiple follow-up points. An analysis of changes in patient status over time, hospitalization rates, rates of discharge to independent living, services provided, and certain structural indicators showed that (1) relative to nursing home care, swing-bed care is more effective in enhancing functional outcomes and discharge to independent living and in reducing hospitalization for long-term care patients, and (2) nursing home care appears more desirable than swing-bed care for long-stay, chronic care patients with no rehabilitation potential. Swing-bed hospitals have gravitated largely to admitting postacute long-term care patients. They do not typically compete directly with community nursing homes for chronic care patients. The greater effectiveness of swing-bed care for patients with near-acute long-term care needs suggests that this approach should be considered in urban communities and that we should scrutinize our current tendency to place in traditional nursing homes many patients who have at least some rehabilitation potential.
到1989年,美国农村社区的1100多家医院将病床用作“摇摆床”,以提供长期护理和急症护理。在本研究中,通过患者预后以及护理过程和结构质量指标,对“摇摆床”医院的长期护理质量与疗养院护理质量进行了比较。本文讨论了测量和分析长期护理质量的几个方法和概念要点。对四个不同原始数据样本中的约2000名患者的数据进行了分析,其中三个样本是纵向的,包含多个随访点。对患者状态随时间的变化、住院率、独立生活出院率、提供的服务以及某些结构指标的分析表明:(1)相对于疗养院护理,“摇摆床”护理在改善功能预后、提高独立生活出院率以及减少长期护理患者的住院方面更有效;(2)对于长期住院且无康复潜力的慢性护理患者,疗养院护理似乎比“摇摆床”护理更合适。“摇摆床”医院主要收治急性后期长期护理患者。它们通常不会与社区疗养院直接竞争慢性护理患者。“摇摆床”护理对近期有急性长期护理需求的患者更有效,这表明在城市社区应考虑采用这种方法,而且我们应该审视当前将许多至少有一定康复潜力的患者安置在传统疗养院的倾向。