Suppr超能文献

应用气钡双重对比法和水扩张法的胃癌术前三维 MDCT 局部分期:一项回顾性队列研究。

Three-dimensional MDCT for preoperative local staging of gastric cancer using gas and water distention methods: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehang-no, Chongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Dec;195(6):1316-23. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4320.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to compare the T-staging accuracy and lesion detectability of MDCT with gas distention versus water distention according to the surgical and histopathologic findings, for the preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For a 3-month period, 113 consecutive patients (72 men and 41 women; age range, 23-85 years; mean age, 58 years) with 116 surgically confirmed gastric cancers from a single institution were included in our study. All patients had undergone preoperative MDCT with either effervescent granules taken orally (n = 55) or after having drunk 1,000 mL of tap water (n = 58) to create gastric distention. In addition to transverse images, multiplanar reformation images and 3D surface shaded display images were also obtained with gas distention CT, and multiplanar reformation images were obtained with water distention CT. The CT images were retrospectively reviewed by two abdominal radiologists separately with regard to T staging and lesion detectability. The accuracy values were compared between the two methods using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

The T-staging accuracy for gastric cancer did not differ significantly between gas distention and water distention CT scans, according to both radiologists (p > 0.05). Furthermore, the staging accuracy values for T1a cancers on gas distention CT scans for radiologists 1 and 2 were also comparable with those of water distention CT scans (91.1% vs 85% for radiologist 1 and 89.3% vs 85% for radiologist 2; p > 0.05). However, the tumor detection rate was significantly higher on gas distention CT scans using 2D and surface shaded display images for both radiologists (94.6% for radiologist 1 and 91.1% for radiologist 2), compared with the rates for water distention CT scans (78.3% and 73.3%) or gas distention CT scans using only 2D images (75.0% and 67.9%) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

MDCT using the gas distention technique showed performance comparable to that of the water distention technique for the T staging of preoperative gastric cancer with better lesion detectability.

摘要

目的

本文旨在比较 MDCT 气体膨胀与水膨胀技术在术前胃癌评估中的 T 分期准确性和病变检出率,并根据手术和组织病理学结果进行比较。

材料与方法

在为期 3 个月的时间里,我们对来自一家机构的 113 例连续经手术证实的胃癌患者(72 名男性和 41 名女性;年龄 23-85 岁;平均年龄 58 岁)进行了研究。所有患者均接受了 MDCT 检查,其中 55 例患者口服产气颗粒,58 例患者饮用 1000 毫升自来水以进行胃部膨胀。除了横轴位图像外,我们还使用气体膨胀 CT 获得了多平面重建图像和 3D 表面遮盖显示图像,使用水膨胀 CT 获得了多平面重建图像。两位腹部放射科医生分别对 CT 图像进行回顾性分析,评估 T 分期和病变检出率。使用 Fisher 确切检验比较两种方法的准确性值。

结果

两位放射科医生均认为,与水膨胀 CT 扫描相比,气体膨胀 CT 扫描对胃癌的 T 分期准确性没有显著差异(p > 0.05)。此外,放射科医生 1 和 2 认为,气体膨胀 CT 扫描对 T1a 期癌症的分期准确性也与水膨胀 CT 扫描相当(放射科医生 1 为 91.1%,放射科医生 2 为 89.3%;p > 0.05)。然而,与水膨胀 CT 扫描相比,气体膨胀 CT 扫描的二维和表面遮盖显示图像的肿瘤检出率更高,两位放射科医生均如此(放射科医生 1 为 94.6%,放射科医生 2 为 91.1%),而与气体膨胀 CT 扫描仅使用二维图像或水膨胀 CT 扫描相比(分别为 75.0%和 73.3%,78.3%和 73.3%),差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。

结论

与水膨胀技术相比,MDCT 气体膨胀技术在术前胃癌 T 分期方面表现相当,具有更好的病变检出率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验