Suppr超能文献

脊柱手术中的术中电生理监测。

Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring in spine surgery.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Dec 1;35(25):2167-79. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f6f0d0.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Review of the literature with analysis of pooled data.

OBJECTIVE

To assess common intraoperative neuromonitoring (IOM) changes that occur during the course of spinal surgery, potential causes of change, and determine appropriate responses. Further, there will be discussion of appropriate application of IOM, and medical legal aspects. The structured literature review will answer the following questions: What are the various IOM methods currently available for spinal surgery? What are the sensitivities and specificities of each modality for neural element injury? How are the changes in each modality best interpreted? What is the appropriate response to indicated changes? Recommendations will be made as to the interpretation and appropriate response to IOM changes.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Total number of abstracts identified and reviewed was 187. Full review was performed on 18 articles.

METHODS

The MEDLINE database was queried using the search terms IOM, spinal surgery, SSEP, wake-up test, MEP, spontaneous and triggered electromyography alone and in various combinations. Abstracts were identified and reviewed. Individual case reports were excluded. Detailed information and data from appropriate articles were assessed and compiled.

RESULTS

Ability to achieve IOM baseline data varied from 70% to 98% for somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP) and 66% to 100% for motor-evoked potentials (MEP) in absence of neural axis abnormality. Multimodality intraoperative neuromonitoring (MIOM) provided false negatives in 0% to 0.79% of cases, whereas isolated SSEP monitoring alone provided false negative in 0.063% to 2.7% of cases. MIOM provided false positive warning in 0.6% to 1.38% of cases.

CONCLUSION

As spine surgery, and patient comorbidity, becomes increasingly complex, IOM permits more aggressive deformity correction and tumor resection. Combination of SSEP and MEP monitoring provides assessment of entire spinal cord functionality in real time. Spontaneous and triggered electromyography add assessment of nerve roots. The wake-up test can continue to serve as a supplement when needed. MIOM may prove useful in preservation of neurologic function where an alteration of approach is possible. IOM is a valuable tool for optimization of outcome in complex spinal surgery.

摘要

研究设计

文献回顾与汇总数据分析。

目的

评估脊柱手术过程中常见的术中神经监测(IONM)变化、变化的潜在原因,并确定适当的应对措施。此外,还将讨论 IONM 的适当应用以及医学法律方面的问题。结构化文献综述将回答以下问题:目前用于脊柱手术的各种 IONM 方法有哪些?每种模态对神经元件损伤的敏感性和特异性是什么?如何最好地解释每种模态的变化?对指示性变化应采取何种适当反应?将就 IONM 变化的解释和适当反应提出建议。

背景资料概述

总共确定并审查了 187 篇摘要。对 18 篇文章进行了全面审查。

方法

使用 IONM、脊柱手术、SSEP、唤醒测试、MEP、自发和触发肌电图等搜索词在 MEDLINE 数据库中进行检索。识别并审查摘要。排除个别病例报告。评估和编译适当文章中的详细信息和数据。

结果

在没有神经轴异常的情况下,体感诱发电位(SSEP)的 IONM 基线数据获取能力为 70%至 98%,运动诱发电位(MEP)为 66%至 100%。多模态术中神经监测(MIOM)的假阴性率为 0%至 0.79%,而单独的 SSEP 监测的假阴性率为 0.063%至 2.7%。MIOM 提供的假阳性警告率为 0.6%至 1.38%。

结论

随着脊柱手术和患者合并症变得越来越复杂,IONM 允许更积极地进行畸形矫正和肿瘤切除。SSEP 和 MEP 监测的组合可实时评估整个脊髓的功能。自发和触发肌电图增加了对神经根的评估。当需要时,唤醒测试可以继续作为补充。MIOM 在可能改变手术方法的情况下,对于保留神经功能可能会有所帮助。IONM 是优化复杂脊柱手术结果的有价值工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验