Veterans Affairs Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Health Care System, Ann Arbor, MI 48113-0170, USA.
Med Care. 2011 Jan;49(1):37-45. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181f37d28.
Professional and patient groups have called for increased participation of patients' informal support networks in chronic disease care, as a means to improve clinical care and self-management. Little is known about the current level of participation of family and friends in the physician visits of adults with chronic illnesses or how that participation affects the experience of patients and physicians.
Written survey of 439 functionally independent adults with diabetes or heart failure and 88 of their primary care physicians (PCPs). Patients were ineligible if they had a memory disorder, needed help with activities of daily living, or were undergoing cancer treatment.
Nonprofessional friends or family ("companions") regularly participated in PCP visits for nearly half (48%) of patients. In multivariable models, patients with low health literacy (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 2.9, confidence interval [CI]: 1.4-5.7), more depressive symptoms (AOR: 1.3, CI: 1.1-1.6), and 4 or more comorbid illnesses (AOR: 3.7, CI: 1.3-10.5) were more likely to report companion participation. Patients reported that they were more likely to understand PCP advice (77%) and discuss difficult topics with the physician (44%) when companions participated in clinic visits. In multivariable models, companion participation was associated with greater patient satisfaction with their PCP (AOR: 1.7, CI: 1.1-2.7). Most PCPs perceived visit companions positively, however 66% perceived 1 or more barriers to increasing companion participation, including increased physician burden (39%), inadequate physician training (27%), and patient privacy concerns (24%).
Patients' companions represent an important source of potential support for the clinical care of functionally independent patients with diabetes or heart failure, particularly for patients vulnerable to worse outcomes. Companion participation in care was associated with positive patient and physician experiences. Physician concerns about companion participation are potentially addressable through existing training resources.
专业人士和患者群体呼吁让患者的非正式支持网络更多地参与到慢性病护理中,以此作为改善临床护理和自我管理的一种手段。然而,人们对于家庭成员和朋友在慢性病患者就诊过程中的参与程度,以及这种参与对患者和医生体验的影响知之甚少。
对 439 名功能独立的糖尿病或心力衰竭患者及其 88 名初级保健医生(PCP)进行了书面调查。如果患者存在记忆障碍、需要日常生活活动帮助或正在接受癌症治疗,则不符合入组条件。
近一半(48%)的患者的非专业朋友或家人(“陪伴者”)定期参与 PCP 就诊。在多变量模型中,健康素养较低的患者(调整后的优势比 [OR]:2.9,置信区间 [CI]:1.4-5.7)、抑郁症状较多的患者(OR:1.3,CI:1.1-1.6)以及患有 4 种或更多合并症的患者(OR:3.7,CI:1.3-10.5)更有可能报告陪伴者的参与。患者报告说,当陪伴者参与就诊时,他们更有可能理解 PCP 的建议(77%)并与医生讨论困难话题(44%)。在多变量模型中,陪伴者的参与与患者对 PCP 的满意度增加相关(OR:1.7,CI:1.1-2.7)。大多数 PCP 对就诊陪伴者持积极态度,但 66%的人认为有 1 个或多个增加陪伴者参与的障碍,包括医生负担增加(39%)、医生培训不足(27%)和患者隐私问题(24%)。
患者的陪伴者是功能独立的糖尿病或心力衰竭患者临床护理的重要潜在支持来源,特别是对于那些可能预后更差的患者。陪伴者参与护理与患者和医生的积极体验相关。通过现有的培训资源,医生对陪伴者参与的担忧是可以解决的。