Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Hum Pathol. 2011 Apr;42(4):455-81. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2010.07.007. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
Transitional cell (urothelial) carcinoma of the bladder is the second most common urologic malignancy and is one of the best understood neoplasms, with relatively well-defined pathogenetic pathways, natural history, and tumor biology. Conventional clinical and pathologic parameters are widely used to grade and stage tumors and to predict clinical outcome of transitional cell carcinoma; but the predictive ability of these parameters is limited, and there is a lack of indices that could allow prospective assessment of risk for individual patients. In the last decade, a wide range of candidate biomarkers representing key pathways in carcinogenesis have been reported to be clinically relevant and potentially useful as diagnostic and prognostic molecular markers, and as potential therapeutic targets. The use of molecular markers has facilitated the development of novel and more accurate diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic strategies. FGFR3 and TP53 mutations have been recognized as key genetic pathways in the carcinogenesis of transitional cell carcinoma. FGFR3 appears to be the most frequently mutated oncogene in transitional cell carcinoma; its mutation is strongly associated with low tumor grade, early stage, and low recurrence rate, which confer a better overall prognosis. In contrast, TP53 mutations are associated with higher tumor grade, more advanced stage, and more frequent tumor recurrences. These molecular markers offer the potential to characterize individual urothelial neoplasms more completely than is possible by histologic evaluation alone. Areas in which molecular markers may prove valuable include prediction of tumor recurrence, molecular staging of transitional cell carcinoma, detection of lymph node metastasis and circulating cancer cells, identification of therapeutic targets, and prediction of response to therapy. With accumulating molecular knowledge of transitional cell carcinoma, we are closer to the goal of bridging the gap between molecular findings and clinical outcomes. Assessment of key genetic pathways and expression profiles could ultimately establish a set of molecular markers to predict the biological nature of tumors and to establish new standards for molecular tumor grading, classification, and prognostication. The main focus of this review is to discuss clinically relevant biomarkers that might be useful in the management of transitional cell carcinoma and to provide approaches in the analysis of molecular pathways that influence the clinical course of bladder cancer.
膀胱移行细胞(尿路上皮)癌是第二大常见的泌尿外科恶性肿瘤,也是最被了解的肿瘤之一,具有相对明确的发病途径、自然病史和肿瘤生物学。传统的临床和病理参数广泛用于分级和分期肿瘤,并预测移行细胞癌的临床结果;但这些参数的预测能力有限,缺乏可以对个体患者进行前瞻性评估的指标。在过去十年中,广泛报道了一系列代表致癌作用关键途径的候选生物标志物,这些生物标志物具有临床相关性,并可能作为诊断和预后分子标志物以及潜在的治疗靶点。分子标志物的使用促进了新型更准确的诊断、预后和治疗策略的发展。FGFR3 和 TP53 突变已被认为是移行细胞癌发生过程中的关键遗传途径。FGFR3 似乎是移行细胞癌中最常突变的癌基因;其突变与低肿瘤分级、早期阶段和低复发率密切相关,从而带来更好的整体预后。相比之下,TP53 突变与更高的肿瘤分级、更晚期的阶段和更频繁的肿瘤复发相关。这些分子标志物提供了比仅通过组织学评估更全面地描述个体尿路上皮肿瘤的潜力。分子标志物可能具有价值的领域包括预测肿瘤复发、移行细胞癌的分子分期、检测淋巴结转移和循环癌细胞、鉴定治疗靶点以及预测对治疗的反应。随着对移行细胞癌分子知识的不断积累,我们更接近将分子发现与临床结果联系起来的目标。对关键遗传途径和表达谱的评估最终可能会建立一组分子标志物,以预测肿瘤的生物学性质,并为分子肿瘤分级、分类和预后建立新的标准。本文的主要重点是讨论可能对移行细胞癌管理有用的临床相关生物标志物,并提供分析影响膀胱癌临床过程的分子途径的方法。