Suppr超能文献

[使用牛津系统对睡眠阶段进行自动分析的可能性与局限性]

[Possibilities and limitations of the automatic analysis of sleep stages using the Oxford system].

作者信息

Obergottsberger S, Zeitlhofer J, Mayr N, Marschnigg E, Deecke L

机构信息

Neurologische Universitätsklinik Wien.

出版信息

EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb. 1990 Mar;21(1):29-34.

PMID:2110885
Abstract

34 ambulatory polygraphic sleep-records of young adults were carried out using the Oxford Medilog 9000 recorder. All of the records underwent automatic evaluation by the Oxford Sleep Stager. 10 cases were, in addition, evaluated visually. 4 records could not be analyzed because of artifacts. Thus, 30 subjects were used in the end for establishing standard values of sleep parameters. Automatic versus automatic comparisons and automatic versus visual comparisons of ten polysomnograms were performed epoch-by-epoch. The automatic versus automatic comparison showed agreement in 85.5% of epochs, and the automatic versus visual comparison in 70.4% of epochs. The Sleep Stager showed the best agreement with the visual evaluation in epoch-by-epoch comparison in the REM-stage (93.9%), the worst in stage 1 (32.4%). In calculating the percentages of total night sleep for the respective sleep stages, the automatic analysis showed strongest disagreement with visual evaluation in the REM-stage (plus 7.5%) and in stage 2 (minus 5.2%).

摘要

使用牛津Medilog 9000记录仪对34名年轻成年人进行了动态多导睡眠记录。所有记录均由牛津睡眠分期仪进行自动评估。此外,对10例记录进行了视觉评估。由于伪迹,4份记录无法分析。因此,最终使用30名受试者来确定睡眠参数的标准值。对十份多导睡眠图逐段进行自动与自动比较以及自动与视觉比较。自动与自动比较在85.5%的时段显示一致,自动与视觉比较在70.4%的时段显示一致。在逐段比较中,睡眠分期仪在快速眼动期与视觉评估的一致性最佳(93.9%),在第1期最差(32.4%)。在计算各睡眠阶段的总夜间睡眠时间百分比时,自动分析在快速眼动期(加7.5%)和第2期(减5.2%)与视觉评估的差异最大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验