Scott Ian A
Princess Alexandra Hospital, Level 5A, Ipswich Road, Brisbane, QLD 4102, Australia.
Aust Health Rev. 2010 Nov;34(4):445-51. doi: 10.1071/AH09777.
Unplanned readmissions of recently discharged patients impose a significant burden on hospitals with limited bed capacity. Deficiencies in discharge processes contribute to such readmissions, which have prompted experimentation with multiple types of peridischarge interventions.
To determine the relative efficacy of peridischarge interventions categorised into two groups: (1) single component interventions (sole or predominant) implemented either before or after discharge; and (2) integrated multicomponent interventions which have pre- and postdischarge elements.
Systematic metareview of controlled trials.
Search of four electronic databases for controlled trials or systematic reviews of trials published between January 1990 and April 2009 that reported effects on readmissions.
Among single-component interventions, only four (intense self-management and transition coaching of high-risk patients and nurse home visits and telephone support of patients with heart failure) were effective in reducing readmissions. Multicomponent interventions that featured early assessment of discharge needs, enhanced patient (and caregiver) education and counselling, and early postdischarge follow-up of high-risk patients were associated with evidence of benefit, especially in populations of older patients and those with heart failure.
Peridischarge interventions are highly heterogenous and reported outcomes show considerable variation. However, multicomponent interventions targeted at high-risk populations that include pre- and postdischarge elements seem to be more effective in reducing readmissions than most single-component interventions, which do not span the hospital–community interface.
近期出院患者的非计划再入院给床位有限的医院带来了沉重负担。出院流程中的缺陷导致了此类再入院情况,这促使人们对多种类型的出院前后干预措施进行试验。
确定分为两组的出院前后干预措施的相对疗效:(1)在出院前或出院后实施的单组分干预措施(单独或主要实施);(2)具有出院前和出院后要素的综合多组分干预措施。
对照试验的系统元分析。
检索四个电子数据库,查找1990年1月至2009年4月期间发表的关于对再入院影响的对照试验或试验系统评价。
在单组分干预措施中,只有四项(对高危患者的强化自我管理和过渡指导以及对心力衰竭患者的护士家访和电话支持)在减少再入院方面有效。以出院需求的早期评估、加强患者(及照顾者)教育和咨询以及对高危患者出院后早期随访为特征的多组分干预措施有获益证据,尤其是在老年患者和心力衰竭患者群体中。
出院前后干预措施高度异质性,报告的结果差异很大。然而,针对高危人群、包括出院前和出院后要素的多组分干预措施在减少再入院方面似乎比大多数不跨越医院 - 社区界面的单组分干预措施更有效。