Biodiversity and Climate Change Center (BiK-F), Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, 60325, Germany.
Parasitol Res. 2011 Apr;108(4):1047-54. doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-2168-4. Epub 2010 Nov 26.
The anthelminthic efficacy of some differently obtained extracts of several plants was tested in vivo in laboratory animals and in vitro. The extracts were obtained by ethanolic, methanolic, aqueous, or chloroform, respectively, acetonitrile polyethylenglycol (PEG) and/or propylencarbonate (PC) elution at room temperature or at 37°C. The plants used were bulbs of onions, garlic, chives, coconut, birch tree, ananas, cistrose, banana, chicory, date palm fruit, fig, pumpkin, and neem tree seeds. The worm systems tested both in vivo and in vitro were Trichuris muris and Angiostrongylus cantonensis but only in vivo Toxocara cati. The tests clearly showed that the different extraction methods eluted different components and different mass amounts, which had different efficacies against the above-cited worms. In vitro effects against A. cantonensis and T.muris were best with aqueous extracts, followed by chloroform extracts. The other plant extracts showed only low or no effects on A. cantonensis in vitro. In the case of T. muris, best results were obtained in vivo and in vitro with PEG/PC extracts of the onion followed by the aqueous extract of coconut. The complete elimination of worms in the in vivo experiments with T. muris was obtained when infected mice were treated with a 1:1 mixture of extracts of coconut and onion being produced by elutions with a mixture of 1:1 PEG and PC and fed daily for 8 days. T. cati in a naturally infected cat was eliminated by daily oral application of 6 ml coco's fluid for 5 days. This study shows that a broad spectrum of plants has anti-nematodal activities, the intensity of which, however, depends on the mode of extraction. This implicates that, if results should be really comparable, the same extraction methods at the same temperatures have to be used. Furthermore, efficacy in in vitro systems does not guarantee as good--if at all--efficacy in vivo.
一些不同来源的几种植物提取物的驱虫效果在实验室动物和体外进行了测试。提取物分别用乙醇、甲醇、水或氯仿,以及室温或 37°C 的乙腈聚乙二醇(PEG)和/或丙二醇碳酸酯(PC)洗脱得到。所用植物为洋葱、大蒜、韭菜、椰子、桦树、菠萝、金银花、香蕉、菊苣、枣椰果、无花果、南瓜和印楝树种子的鳞茎、块茎或果实。体内和体外测试的蠕虫系统是旋毛虫和广州管圆线虫,但仅在体内测试了猫弓首蛔虫。试验清楚地表明,不同的提取方法洗脱了不同的成分和不同的量,对上述蠕虫具有不同的疗效。体外对广州管圆线虫和旋毛虫的作用最好的是水提取物,其次是氯仿提取物。其他植物提取物对体外广州管圆线虫的作用仅低或无。对于旋毛虫,体内和体外最好的结果是用洋葱的 PEG/PC 提取物,其次是椰子的水提取物。当用由 1:1PEG 和 PC 混合物洗脱产生的椰子和洋葱提取物 1:1 混合物处理感染小鼠并每天喂食 8 天时,在体内实验中完全消除了旋毛虫。在自然感染猫中,每日口服 6 毫升椰子液可消除猫弓首蛔虫。本研究表明,广谱植物具有抗线虫活性,但其强度取决于提取方式。这意味着如果结果要真正可比,必须使用相同的提取方法在相同的温度下进行。此外,体外系统的疗效并不能保证体内疗效好(如果有的话)。