Troyer Jennifer L, McAuley William J, McCutcheon Megan E
Department of Economics, Belk College of Business, University of North Carolina, NC 28223-0001, USA.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2010 Dec;110(12):1840-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.09.013.
Many older adults experience hyperlipidemia and hypertension, but there is little information about whether medical nutrition therapy (MNT) or therapeutic meals have independent or joint beneficial effects on older adults with these diagnoses.
To assess the cost-effectiveness of MNT and therapeutic meals for older adults with hyperlipidemia and/or hypertension.
A 1-year prospective four-arm controlled randomized community-based clinical trial.
SUBJECTS/SETTING: Participants were people ages 60 years or older residing in community settings who were medically diagnosed with either hypertension or hyperlipidemia. They were recruited through a number of venues beginning in May 2003.
The 321 eligible individuals were assigned to one of four arms: (a) a literature control group, (b) a therapeutic meal group that received seven diagnosis-appropriate therapeutic meals a week, (c) an MNT group, and (d) an MNT-plus-therapeutic meal group.
The outcome measure was quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Costs included both intervention and medical costs.
Estimations of separate models of costs and QALYs facilitated the construction of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Net benefit analysis produced the probability that each intervention was cost-effective given different values for society's willingness to pay for a QALY.
Therapeutic meals are cost-effective. Using the net benefit approach and a willingness to pay of $109,000 per QALY, the probability that the therapeutic meal delivery program is cost-effective is 95% and for MNT the probability is 90%. However, the combination of MNT and therapeutic meals did not have an independent significant effect on QALYs.
Results inform the debate about extending Medicare funding for MNT to individuals with hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Future research should include more individuals who are not currently receiving medications for these diseases.
许多老年人患有高脂血症和高血压,但关于医学营养治疗(MNT)或治疗性膳食对患有这些病症的老年人是否具有独立或联合有益效果的信息很少。
评估MNT和治疗性膳食对患有高脂血症和/或高血压的老年人的成本效益。
一项为期1年的前瞻性四臂对照社区临床试验。
受试者/环境:参与者为60岁及以上居住在社区环境中的人,他们被医学诊断患有高血压或高脂血症。他们从2003年5月开始通过多个场所招募。
321名符合条件的个体被分配到四个组之一:(a)文献对照组,(b)每周接受七次诊断适配治疗性膳食的治疗性膳食组,(c)MNT组,以及(d)MNT加治疗性膳食组。
结局指标为质量调整生命年(QALYs)。成本包括干预成本和医疗成本。
成本和QALYs单独模型的估计有助于构建增量成本效益比。净效益分析得出了在社会为一个QALY的支付意愿的不同值下,每种干预具有成本效益的概率。
治疗性膳食具有成本效益。使用净效益方法和每QALY支付意愿为109,000美元,治疗性膳食配送计划具有成本效益的概率为95%,MNT的概率为90%。然而,MNT和治疗性膳食的组合对QALYs没有独立的显著影响。
研究结果为关于将医疗保险对MNT的资助扩展到患有高血压和高脂血症的个体的辩论提供了信息。未来的研究应纳入更多目前未接受这些疾病药物治疗的个体。