Coordination Centre for Effects, PBL, PO Box 303, 3720 AH Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Environ Pollut. 2011 Oct;159(10):2223-7. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.11.001. Epub 2010 Nov 26.
Critical loads are widely used in the effects-based assessment of emission reduction policies. While the impacts of acidification have diminished, there is increasing concern regarding the effects of nitrogen deposition on terrestrial ecosystems. In this context much attention has been focussed on empirical critical loads as well as simulations with linked geochemistry-vegetation models. Surprisingly little attention has been paid to adapt the widely used simple mass balance approach. This approach has the well-established benefit of easy regional applicability, while incorporating specified critical chemical criteria to protect specified receptors. As plant occurrence/biodiversity is related to both the nutrient and acidity status of an ecosystem, a single abiotic factor (chemical criterion) is not sufficient. Rather than an upper limit for deposition (i.e., critical load), linked nutrient nitrogen and acidity chemical criteria for plant occurrence result in an 'optimal' nitrogen and sulphur deposition envelope.
临界负荷广泛应用于减排政策的基于效应的评估。虽然酸化的影响已经减弱,但人们越来越关注氮沉积对陆地生态系统的影响。在这种情况下,人们非常关注经验临界负荷以及与化学-植被模型相关的模拟。令人惊讶的是,很少有人关注广泛使用的简单质量平衡方法的适应性。这种方法具有易于在区域内应用的明显优势,同时纳入了特定的临界化学标准来保护特定的受体。由于植物的出现/生物多样性与生态系统的养分和酸度状况有关,单一的非生物因素(化学标准)是不够的。与氮沉积的上限(即临界负荷)不同,植物出现的氮和酸化学关联标准导致了“最佳”氮和硫沉积包络。