Suppr超能文献

自伤性烧伤-在一家三级转诊中心对 14 年自伤性烧伤的回顾中,其类型学及其预后相关性。

The self-inflicted burns-Typology and its prognostic relevance in a 14-year review of self-inflicted burns in a tertiary referral centre.

机构信息

Burn Unit and Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, São José Hospital, Rua José António Serrano, 1150-199 Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Burns. 2011 Mar;37(2):322-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2010.07.014. Epub 2010 Nov 5.

Abstract

Self-inflicted burns (SIB) are responsible for 2-6% of admissions to Burn Units in Europe and North America, and for as many as 25% of admissions in developing nations. Recently, a promising new tool was proposed to stratify SIB patients in the following subgroups: "typical", "delirious", and "reactive". However, as far as the authors know, the clinical usefulness of this instrument has not yet been validated by others. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 56 patients admitted to our Burn Unit with the diagnosis of SIB injury in the past 14 years. The following parameters were evaluated: demographic features; psychiatric illness; substance abuse; mechanism of injury; burn depth, total body surface area (TBSA) involved, Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI); length of hospital stay, and mortality. All patients were followed up by a psychologist and a psychiatrist, and were classified according to the SIB-Typology Tool, into three classes: "typical", "delirious" and "reactive". There was a slight predominance of the "typical" type (44.6%), followed by the "delirious" type (30.4%), and, finally the "reactive" type (25.0%). Mortality was significantly higher in the "typical" subgroup. In conclusion, the SIB-Typology Tool appears to be a valuable instrument in the clinical management of SIB patients.

摘要

自伤性烧伤(SIB)占欧洲和北美的烧伤病房入院人数的 2-6%,占发展中国家入院人数的 25%之多。最近,有人提出了一种很有前途的新工具,可以将 SIB 患者分为以下亚组:“典型”、“谵妄”和“反应性”。然而,据作者所知,该工具的临床实用性尚未得到其他人的验证。我们回顾性分析了过去 14 年来我院烧伤病房收治的 56 例 SIB 损伤患者的临床记录。评估了以下参数:人口统计学特征;精神疾病;药物滥用;损伤机制;烧伤深度、体表面积(TBSA)、简明烧伤严重指数(ABSI);住院时间和死亡率。所有患者均由心理学家和精神科医生随访,并根据 SIB 分型工具分为三类:“典型”、“谵妄”和“反应性”。“典型”型略占优势(44.6%),其次是“谵妄”型(30.4%),最后是“反应性”型(25.0%)。“典型”亚组的死亡率明显更高。总之,SIB 分型工具似乎是 SIB 患者临床管理的一种有价值的工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验