• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自伤性烧伤-在一家三级转诊中心对 14 年自伤性烧伤的回顾中,其类型学及其预后相关性。

The self-inflicted burns-Typology and its prognostic relevance in a 14-year review of self-inflicted burns in a tertiary referral centre.

机构信息

Burn Unit and Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, São José Hospital, Rua José António Serrano, 1150-199 Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Burns. 2011 Mar;37(2):322-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2010.07.014. Epub 2010 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2010.07.014
PMID:21115293
Abstract

Self-inflicted burns (SIB) are responsible for 2-6% of admissions to Burn Units in Europe and North America, and for as many as 25% of admissions in developing nations. Recently, a promising new tool was proposed to stratify SIB patients in the following subgroups: "typical", "delirious", and "reactive". However, as far as the authors know, the clinical usefulness of this instrument has not yet been validated by others. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 56 patients admitted to our Burn Unit with the diagnosis of SIB injury in the past 14 years. The following parameters were evaluated: demographic features; psychiatric illness; substance abuse; mechanism of injury; burn depth, total body surface area (TBSA) involved, Abbreviated Burn Severity Index (ABSI); length of hospital stay, and mortality. All patients were followed up by a psychologist and a psychiatrist, and were classified according to the SIB-Typology Tool, into three classes: "typical", "delirious" and "reactive". There was a slight predominance of the "typical" type (44.6%), followed by the "delirious" type (30.4%), and, finally the "reactive" type (25.0%). Mortality was significantly higher in the "typical" subgroup. In conclusion, the SIB-Typology Tool appears to be a valuable instrument in the clinical management of SIB patients.

摘要

自伤性烧伤(SIB)占欧洲和北美的烧伤病房入院人数的 2-6%,占发展中国家入院人数的 25%之多。最近,有人提出了一种很有前途的新工具,可以将 SIB 患者分为以下亚组:“典型”、“谵妄”和“反应性”。然而,据作者所知,该工具的临床实用性尚未得到其他人的验证。我们回顾性分析了过去 14 年来我院烧伤病房收治的 56 例 SIB 损伤患者的临床记录。评估了以下参数:人口统计学特征;精神疾病;药物滥用;损伤机制;烧伤深度、体表面积(TBSA)、简明烧伤严重指数(ABSI);住院时间和死亡率。所有患者均由心理学家和精神科医生随访,并根据 SIB 分型工具分为三类:“典型”、“谵妄”和“反应性”。“典型”型略占优势(44.6%),其次是“谵妄”型(30.4%),最后是“反应性”型(25.0%)。“典型”亚组的死亡率明显更高。总之,SIB 分型工具似乎是 SIB 患者临床管理的一种有价值的工具。

相似文献

1
The self-inflicted burns-Typology and its prognostic relevance in a 14-year review of self-inflicted burns in a tertiary referral centre.自伤性烧伤-在一家三级转诊中心对 14 年自伤性烧伤的回顾中,其类型学及其预后相关性。
Burns. 2011 Mar;37(2):322-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2010.07.014. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
2
A new diagnostic tool for the classification of patients with self-inflicted burns (SIB): the SIB-Typology and its implications for clinical practice.一种用于自我烧伤患者分类的新诊断工具:自我烧伤类型学及其对临床实践的影响。
Burns. 2009 Aug;35(5):733-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2008.11.013. Epub 2009 Mar 20.
3
Burns inflicted by self or by others--an 11 year snapshot.自我或他人造成的烧伤——11年的概况
Burns. 2007 Feb;33(1):92-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2006.04.008. Epub 2006 Oct 30.
4
Mortality risk and length of stay associated with self-inflicted burn injury: evidence from a national sample of 30,382 adult patients.与自伤性烧伤相关的死亡风险和住院时间:来自30382名成年患者全国样本的证据。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):118-25. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000293122.43433.72.
5
Self-inflicted burns in the Irish National Burns Unit.爱尔兰国家烧伤中心的自伤性烧伤。
Burns. 2011 Nov;37(7):1229-32. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2011.04.011. Epub 2011 Jul 2.
6
Self-inflicted burns: an eight year retrospective study in Finland.自伤性烧伤:芬兰一项为期八年的回顾性研究。
Burns. 2004 Aug;30(5):443-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2004.01.020.
7
Self-inflicted burn injuries: an 11-year retrospective study.自伤性烧伤:一项11年的回顾性研究。
J Burn Care Rehabil. 1999 Mar-Apr;20(2):191-4; discussion 189-90.
8
Case-controlled study of patients with self-inflicted burns.自我烧伤患者的病例对照研究。
Burns. 2005 Jun;31(4):471-5. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2004.12.006. Epub 2005 Feb 17.
9
A review of the trends of self-inflicted burns.自我烧伤趋势综述。
Burns. 2004 Sep;30(6):573-6. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2004.03.010.
10
Predisposing factors for self-inflicted burns.自伤性烧伤的诱发因素。
J Burn Care Rehabil. 2003 Jul-Aug;24(4):223-7. doi: 10.1097/01.BCR.0000075970.36430.7F.

引用本文的文献

1
Lisbon Burn Centre experience with intentional burn injuries.里斯本烧伤中心处理故意烧伤的经验。
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2020 Mar 31;33(1):14-19.
2
Self-inflicted burns in a National Swedish Burn Centre: an overview.瑞典国家烧伤中心的自伤性烧伤:概述
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2019 Dec 31;32(4):272-277.
3
Self-immolation in Iran: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.伊朗的自焚事件:系统评价与荟萃分析
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2019 Jan;7(1):1-8. doi: 10.29252/beat-070101.
4
From Querulous to Suicidal: Self-immolation in Public Places as a Symbolic Response to the Feeling of Injustice.从抱怨到自杀:公共场所自焚作为对不公正感的一种象征性回应。
Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 31;8:1901. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01901. eCollection 2017.
5
Outcomes of patients who commit suicide by burning.自焚患者的结局。
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2013 Mar 31;26(1):36-9.