Adarsha M S, Lata D A
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, V.S. Dental college and Hospital, Bangalore, India.
J Conserv Dent. 2010 Jul;13(3):119-23. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.71641.
AIMS/OBJECTIVES: To evaluate in vitro the ultrasonic vibration efficacy with and without water spray cooling on the reduction of the amount of force necessary to dislodge the cast posts cemented with resin cement and to compare it with those cemented with GIC Type I luting cement.
SIXTY SAMPLES WERE DIVIDED INTO SIX GROUPS: groups 1, 2, 3, posts cemented with GIC; groups 4, 5, 6, posts cemented with resin; groups 1 and 4 (controls), no ultrasound; groups 2 and 5, ultrasound without water spray; and groups 3 and 6, ultrasound with water spray. Instron testing machine was used to dislodge the posts from the root canals and the data was statistically analyzed.
Ultrasound with water spray (group 3) among the GIC groups reduced the traction force necessary to extract posts by 53.33% whereas ultrasound without water spray (group 5) among the resin groups reduced by 59.5% compared to control.
Ultrasound with water is more effective in removing posts cemented with GIC because of the ultrasonic energy being transferred to the post. Ultasonics without water is more effective in removing posts fixed with resin cement probably by the indirect action of heat production.
在体外评估有无喷水冷却的超声振动对减少用树脂水门汀粘结的铸造桩脱位所需力量的效果,并将其与用I型玻璃离子水门汀粘结的桩进行比较。
60个样本分为六组:第1、2、3组,桩用玻璃离子水门汀粘结;第4、5、6组,桩用树脂粘结;第1和4组(对照组),不使用超声;第2和5组,无喷水的超声;第3和6组,有喷水的超声。使用英斯特朗测试机将桩从根管中脱位,并对数据进行统计分析。
在玻璃离子水门汀组中,有喷水的超声(第3组)使拔出桩所需的牵引力降低了53.33%,而在树脂组中,无喷水的超声(第5组)与对照组相比降低了59.5%。
有水的超声在去除用玻璃离子水门汀粘结的桩时更有效,因为超声能量传递到了桩上。无水的超声在去除用树脂水门汀固定的桩时更有效,可能是通过产热的间接作用。