Dixon Eric B, Kaczkowski Peter J, Nicholls Jack I, Harrington Gerald W
Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA.
J Endod. 2002 Feb;28(2):111-5. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200202000-00016.
The relative performance of two different ultrasonic units commonly used clinically for post removal was evaluated using tips designed specifically for post vibration. Twenty-four extracted maxillary and mandibular cuspids with crowns removed at the labial cementoenamel junction were treated endodontically. Post spaces were made 10 mm into the roots before cementing a 16 mm #5 (0.050-inch) Para-Post with zinc phosphate cement. The teeth were divided into three similar groups of eight. Post retention was assessed in group 1. Ultrasonic vibration was applied to groups 2 and 3 until post removal. The average force required to dislodge the posts from the teeth in group 1 (control group, no ultrasound) was 40.5 kg (SD = 12.3 kg). The average time for post removal in group 2 (Spartan) was 4:52 min (SD = 2:26). The average time for post removal in group 3 (Enac) was 1:31 min (SD = 0:34). The difference between groups 2 and 3 was statistically significant (p < 0.005). Use of ultrasonic tips designed for post vibration and maximization of audible sound level during ultrasonic treatment of posts seem to play an important role in the effectiveness and efficiency of post removal. The results obtained indicate that both the Enac ultrasonic unit with the ST-09 vibration tip and the Spartan ultrasonic unit with the Analytic VT-S tip were effective. Nevertheless, the Enac ultrasonic unit with the ST-09 vibration tip was clearly more efficient under these study conditions, resulting in typical post removal times of <2 min.
