Suppr超能文献

回顾性评估药师对老年澳大利亚患者进行的家庭用药回顾,使用药物适宜性指数。

Retrospective evaluation of home medicines review by pharmacists in older Australian patients using the medication appropriateness index.

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Ann Pharmacother. 2010 Dec;44(12):1922-9. doi: 10.1345/aph.1P373. Epub 2010 Nov 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Home Medicines Review (HMR), a community-based collaborative service provided by general practitioners (GPs) and accredited pharmacists in Australia, has demonstrated effectiveness in preventing, detecting, and resolving medication-related problems. The Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) has been found to be a reliable, valid, standardized instrument for assessment of multiple elements of drug therapy prescribing.

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively evaluate the impact of HMRs on the appropriateness of prescribing, using the MAI as a tool to categorize pharmacists' recommendations.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on a sample of 270 HMR cases pertaining to community-dwelling older people (≥ 65 years) in New South Wales, Australia. The HMRs were collected from 7 accredited pharmacists using purposive sampling. All HMRs were conducted between February 2006 and October 2009. MAI scores were retrospectively calculated at baseline, after the HMR service based on the pharmacist's recommendations to the GP, and following uptake of the pharmacist's recommendations by the GP.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD age of the patients was 75.3 ± 7.4 years and 55% were female. Overall, almost all (99%; n = 267) patients had at least 1 inappropriate rating at baseline and more than 50% (n = 154) of the patients had a cumulative MAI score >15. The mean MAI score at baseline was 18.6 ± 11.3, which decreased to 9.3 ± 7.5 after HMR. The number of patients with a cumulative MAI score ≤ 15 increased to 216 after the HMR service, compared to 116 at baseline. Pharmacists' recommendations documented in the HMR reports and uptake of these recommendations by the GP resulted in a statistically significant decrease in the MAI scores (both p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrates that the provision of medication reviews by accredited pharmacists can improve the appropriateness of prescribing as demonstrated by the change in MAI score and, hence, has the potential to improve patient outcomes. Pharmacists who perform medication reviews could also consider including the systematic approach of applying the MAI to assist in optimizing prescribing in older people.

摘要

背景

家庭用药审查(HMR)是一种由全科医生(GP)和认证药剂师在澳大利亚提供的基于社区的合作服务,已证明在预防、发现和解决与药物相关的问题方面具有有效性。药物适宜性指数(MAI)已被证明是一种可靠、有效的、标准化的工具,可用于评估药物治疗处方的多个要素。

目的

使用 MAI 作为工具对药剂师的建议进行分类,回顾性评估 HMR 对处方适宜性的影响。

方法

对澳大利亚新南威尔士州 270 例社区居住的老年人(≥65 岁)的 HMR 样本进行回顾性分析。HMR 是通过目的性抽样从 7 名认证药剂师处收集的。所有 HMR 均于 2006 年 2 月至 2009 年 10 月进行。回顾性计算 MAI 评分,基线时、HMR 服务后(基于药剂师向 GP 的建议)以及 GP 采纳药剂师的建议后。

结果

患者的平均年龄±标准差为 75.3±7.4 岁,55%为女性。总体而言,几乎所有(99%;n=267)患者在基线时至少有 1 项不适当的评分,超过 50%(n=154)的患者的累积 MAI 评分>15。基线时的平均 MAI 评分为 18.6±11.3,HMR 后降至 9.3±7.5。与基线时的 116 例相比,HMR 服务后累积 MAI 评分≤15 的患者数增加至 216 例。HMR 报告中记录的药剂师建议以及 GP 对这些建议的采纳导致 MAI 评分显著下降(均 p<0.001)。

结论

该研究表明,认证药剂师提供的药物审查可提高处方适宜性,如 MAI 评分的变化所示,因此有可能改善患者结局。进行药物审查的药剂师还可以考虑采用系统方法应用 MAI 来协助优化老年人的处方。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验