• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药剂师主导的社区药房华法林用药患者用药审查。

Pharmacist-led medicine use review in community pharmacy for patients on warfarin.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.

Department of Statistics and Operations Research, Faculty of Science, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Jun;41(3):741-750. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00824-4. Epub 2019 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1007/s11096-019-00824-4
PMID:31006832
Abstract

Background Medicine use review by pharmacists has the potential to improve anticoagulation therapy management in patients on warfarin. Objective To develop, implement and evaluate a pharmacist-led medication use review service for patients on warfarin. Setting Six community pharmacies in Malta. Method Patients (N = 100) aged 18 or older and on warfarin were recruited through pre-selected community-pharmacies. These patients were then invited to attend two sessions: a review session (t) and a follow-up session after 2 months (t). During the medication use review session, medication reconciliation was performed (a) to detect drug-related problems using the DOCUMENT classification system, (b) to develop an individualised care plan for each patient and (c) to recommend an action for each identified problem for physician, pharmacist or patient consideration. At t, the degree of acceptance of the recommendations was determined by assessing the number of drug-related problems for which action was taken to address the problem. International normalisation ration (INR) control was evaluated by calculating the percentage Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) at t and t using the Rosendaal linear interpolation method. Main outcome measures Frequency and type of drug-related problems detected; percentage of accepted recommendations; and INR control. Results A total of 481 drug-related problems were identified; 40% (n = 190) were related to warfarin treatment. Need for monitoring (30%; n = 145), lack of compliance (20%; n = 97) and need for patient education (19%; n = 90) were the top three problems identified. There was a significant correlation between frequency of the problems and number of chronic medications (Spearman Correlation 0.583, p < 0.001), number of comorbidities (Spearman Correlation 0.327, p = 0.001) and older age (Spearman Correlation 0.285, p = 0.04). A total of 475 recommendations were followed-up; 49% (n = 234) were referred for consideration by the physician. The percentage of recommendations accepted (84%; n = 397) was significantly higher than the percentage of recommendations not accepted (16%; n = 78) (p < 0.001). The time in therapeutic range improved significantly from 68.7% at t to 79.8% at t (p = 0.01). Conclusions The high percentage of accepted recommendations and the improvement in INR control indicate that a pharmacist-led medication use review service in community pharmacy contributes to improving anticoagulation therapy management in patients on warfarin.

摘要

背景 药剂师进行的药物使用审查有可能改善华法林患者的抗凝治疗管理。目的 开发、实施和评估药剂师主导的华法林患者用药审查服务。地点 马耳他的六家社区药房。方法 通过预选的社区药房招募年龄在 18 岁或以上且正在服用华法林的患者(N=100)。然后邀请这些患者参加两个会议:审查会议(t)和两个月后的随访会议(t)。在药物使用审查会议期间,进行药物重整(a)使用 DOCUMENT 分类系统检测药物相关问题,(b)为每位患者制定个性化护理计划,以及(c)为医生、药剂师或患者考虑,针对每个识别的问题提出建议。在 t 时,通过评估采取行动解决问题的药物相关问题的数量,确定建议的接受程度。通过使用 Rosendaal 线性内插法计算 t 和 t 时国际标准化比值(INR)的治疗范围内时间百分比(TTR)来评估 INR 控制。主要观察指标 检测到的药物相关问题的频率和类型;接受建议的百分比;以及 INR 控制。结果 共发现 481 例药物相关问题;40%(n=190)与华法林治疗有关。需要监测(30%;n=145)、缺乏依从性(20%;n=97)和需要患者教育(19%;n=90)是发现的前三个问题。问题的频率与慢性药物的数量(Spearman 相关系数 0.583,p<0.001)、合并症的数量(Spearman 相关系数 0.327,p=0.001)和年龄较大(Spearman 相关系数 0.285,p=0.04)之间存在显著相关性。共跟进了 475 条建议;49%(n=234)被推荐供医生考虑。接受建议的百分比(84%;n=397)明显高于不接受建议的百分比(16%;n=78)(p<0.001)。TTR 时间从 t 时的 68.7%显著提高到 t 时的 79.8%(p=0.01)。结论 高比例的建议被接受以及 INR 控制的改善表明,社区药房中由药剂师主导的药物使用审查服务有助于改善华法林患者的抗凝治疗管理。

相似文献

1
Pharmacist-led medicine use review in community pharmacy for patients on warfarin.药剂师主导的社区药房华法林用药患者用药审查。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Jun;41(3):741-750. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00824-4. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
2
Drug-related problems identified in post-discharge medication reviews for patients taking warfarin.华法林治疗患者出院后药物治疗评估中发现的与药物相关问题。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2011 Aug;33(4):621-6. doi: 10.1007/s11096-011-9515-0. Epub 2011 May 19.
3
Impact of clinical pharmacist intervention in anticoagulation clinic in Sudan.临床药师干预对苏丹抗凝门诊的影响。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2017 Aug;39(4):769-773. doi: 10.1007/s11096-017-0475-x. Epub 2017 May 15.
4
Pharmacist's interventions improve time in therapeutic range of elderly rural patients on warfarin therapy: a randomized trial.药剂师的干预措施可改善接受华法林治疗的老年农村患者处于治疗范围内的时间:一项随机试验。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Oct;40(5):1078-1085. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0691-z. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
5
Patient-reported common symptoms as an assessment of interventions in medication reviews: a randomised, controlled trial.患者报告的常见症状作为药物评估干预措施的一项内容:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Feb;40(1):126-134. doi: 10.1007/s11096-017-0575-7. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
6
Outcomes of warfarin therapy managed by pharmacists via hospital anticoagulation clinic versus online anticoagulation clinic.药剂师通过医院抗凝门诊与在线抗凝门诊管理华法林治疗的结果。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Oct;40(5):1072-1077. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0674-0. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
7
Health care expenditures and therapeutic outcomes of a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation service versus usual medical care.药师管理抗凝治疗服务与常规医疗保健的医疗支出和治疗效果。
Pharmacotherapy. 2011 Jul;31(7):686-94. doi: 10.1592/phco.31.7.686.
8
Evaluating warfarin management by pharmacists in a community teaching hospital.评估社区教学医院中药剂师对华法林的管理情况。
Consult Pharm. 2014 Feb;29(2):95-103. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2014.95.
9
Efficacy and safety of a pharmacist-managed inpatient anticoagulation service for warfarin initiation and titration.药师管理的住院患者抗凝治疗启动和滴定服务的疗效和安全性。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2011 Oct;36(5):585-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2010.01216.x. Epub 2010 Nov 12.
10
Medication reviews in primary care in Sweden: importance of clinical pharmacists' recommendations on drug-related problems.瑞典初级保健中的药物评估:临床药师对药物相关问题的建议的重要性。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Feb;38(1):41-5. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0189-x. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
A three-year post-graduate Doctorate in Pharmacy course incorporating professional, experiential and research activities: A collaborative innovative approach.一个为期三年的药学博士研究生课程,融合了专业、实践和研究活动:一种合作创新的方法。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2021 Apr 16;10:93. doi: 10.15694/mep.2021.000093.1. eCollection 2021.
2
Impact of Clinical Pharmacist Running Anticoagulation Clinic in Saudi Arabia.临床药师在沙特阿拉伯开设抗凝门诊的影响。
J Clin Med. 2023 Jun 7;12(12):3887. doi: 10.3390/jcm12123887.
3
Practices, beliefs, and attitudes of clinicians in prescribing direct oral anticoagulants for obese adults with atrial fibrillation: a qualitative study.

本文引用的文献

1
PCNE definition of medication review: reaching agreement.药物评估的PCNE定义:达成共识。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Oct;40(5):1199-1208. doi: 10.1007/s11096-018-0696-7. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
2
Effect of Standardized Warfarin Treatment Protocol on Anticoagulant Effect: Comparison of a Warfarin Medication Therapy Adherence Clinic with Usual Medical Care.标准化华法林治疗方案对抗凝效果的影响:华法林药物治疗依从性诊所与常规医疗护理的比较。
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Nov 9;8:637. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00637. eCollection 2017.
3
Supporting underserved patients with their medicines: a study protocol for a patient/professional coproduced education intervention for community pharmacy staff to improve the provision and delivery of Medicine Use Reviews (MURs).
临床医生在为肥胖的房颤成年患者开直接口服抗凝剂时的实践、信念和态度:一项定性研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2023 Aug;45(4):962-969. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01583-z. Epub 2023 May 30.
4
Evaluation of Remote Pharmacist-Led Outpatient Service for Geriatric Patients on Rivaroxaban for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation During the COVID-19 Pandemic.COVID-19大流行期间,针对使用利伐沙班治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动的老年患者开展远程药师主导门诊服务的评估
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Aug 21;11:1275. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01275. eCollection 2020.
为服务不足的患者提供药物支持:一项关于患者/专业人员共同制定的教育干预措施的研究方案,旨在对社区药房工作人员进行培训,以改善用药评估(MURs)的提供和实施情况。
BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 9;6(12):e013500. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013500.
4
Comparison of pharmacist and public views and experiences of community pharmacy medicines-related services in England.英格兰社区药房药品相关服务的药剂师与公众观点及体验比较。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Sep 9;10:1749-58. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S112931. eCollection 2016.
5
Polypharmacy and effects of apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: post hoc analysis of the ARISTOTLE trial.房颤患者中多药联合治疗及阿哌沙班与华法林的疗效比较:ARISTOTLE试验的事后分析
BMJ. 2016 Jun 15;353:i2868. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2868.
6
Impact of a community pharmacist-led medication review on medicines use in patients on polypharmacy--a prospective randomised controlled trial.社区药剂师主导的用药审查对多重用药患者药物使用的影响——一项前瞻性随机对照试验
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Apr 23;16:145. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1384-8.
7
Implications of a clinical medication review and a pharmaceutical care plan of polypharmacy patients with a cardiovascular disorder.患有心血管疾病的多重用药患者的临床用药评估及药学服务计划的意义。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Aug;38(4):808-15. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0281-x. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
8
Drug-related problems and potential contributing factors in the management of deep vein thrombosis.深静脉血栓形成管理中的药物相关问题及潜在促成因素。
BMC Hematol. 2016 Feb 4;16:2. doi: 10.1186/s12878-016-0043-y. eCollection 2016.
9
Drug-related problems vary with medication category and treatment duration in Taiwanese heart failure outpatients receiving case management.在接受个案管理的台湾心力衰竭门诊患者中,与药物相关的问题因药物类别和治疗持续时间而异。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2016 May;115(5):335-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2015.11.014. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
10
Polypharmacy and the Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin in the Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.华法林与利伐沙班预防非瓣膜性心房颤动患者卒中的疗效和安全性比较:药物治疗方案的影响。
Circulation. 2016 Jan 26;133(4):352-60. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018544. Epub 2015 Dec 16.