Suppr超能文献

低水平激光治疗腕管综合征:临床、电生理和超声评估。

Low-level laser in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical, electrophysiological, and ultrasonographical evaluation.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Osmangazi University, Meselik Campus, 26480 Eskisehir, Turkey.

出版信息

Rheumatol Int. 2012 Feb;32(2):409-15. doi: 10.1007/s00296-010-1652-6. Epub 2010 Dec 1.

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Sixty patients with CTS were included in this placebo-controlled and double-blind study and randomly assigned to three treatment groups: active laser with a dosage of 1.2 J/per painful point, active laser with a dosage of 0.6 J/per painful point, and placebo groups. A total of 5 points across the median nerve trace were irradiated with Gal-Al-As diode laser. All groups were treated 5 times per week for 3 weeks. Clinical assessments included pain intensity, grip strength, symptom severity score (SSS), functional status score (FSS), nerve conduction studies, and cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve as measured by ultrasonography. Compared to baseline, post-treatment VAS scores (group 1, P < 0.001; group 2, P < 0.001; group 3, P < 0.01), grip strength (P < 0.05), SSS scores (group 1, P < 0.001; group 2, P < 0.001; group 3, P < 0.01), and FSS scores (P < 0.05) improved significantly in all groups. Only sensorial nerve velocity measurements on the palmar region showed a significant improvement in both active laser groups (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in any of the outcome measures among the groups. With the chosen laser type and dose regimen, the results suggested that LLLT was no more effective than placebo in CTS.

摘要

本研究旨在探究低水平激光疗法(LLLT)治疗腕管综合征(CTS)的疗效。本安慰剂对照、双盲研究纳入了 60 名 CTS 患者,随机分为三组:1.2 J/痛点的活性激光组、0.6 J/痛点的活性激光组和安慰剂组。采用 GaAlAs 二极管激光对正中神经迹线上的 5 个点进行照射。所有组每周治疗 5 次,共 3 周。临床评估包括疼痛强度、握力、症状严重程度评分(SSS)、功能状态评分(FSS)、神经传导研究以及超声测量的正中神经横截面积(CSA)。与基线相比,治疗后 VAS 评分(组 1,P < 0.001;组 2,P < 0.001;组 3,P < 0.01)、握力(P < 0.05)、SSS 评分(组 1,P < 0.001;组 2,P < 0.001;组 3,P < 0.01)和 FSS 评分(P < 0.05)在所有组中均显著改善。只有在两组活性激光组中,掌侧感觉神经速度测量才有显著改善(P < 0.01)。各组间任何结果测量均无显著差异。在所选激光类型和剂量方案下,结果表明 LLLT 治疗 CTS 并不优于安慰剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验