1st Neurology Clinic, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Rheumatol Int. 2010 Apr;30(6):761-5. doi: 10.1007/s00296-009-1061-x. Epub 2009 Jul 11.
Although nerve conduction study (NCS) is the method most frequently used in daily clinical practice to confirm clinical diagnosis of Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), ultrasonographic (US) measurement of the median nerve cross-sectional area is both sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of CTS. Moreover, an algorithm evaluating CTS severity based on CSA of median nerve was suggested. This study is aimed to investigate the clinical usefulness of this algorithm in assessing CTS severity. The patients underwent a full clinical examination, including Tinel and Phalen test, and questioned about symptoms and the secondary causes of CTS. All of the patients refilled a Turkish version Levine Boston Carpal tunnel syndrome questionnaire (BQ) and the visual analog scale for pain (VAS 0-100 mm) A MyLab 70 US system (Esaote Biomedica, Genoa, Italy) equipped with a broadband 6-18 MHz linear transducer was used for US examination. The cross-sectional area of the median nerve was measured at the proximal inlet of the carpal tunnel (US cut-off points that discriminate between different grades of CTS severity as 10.0-13.0 mm(2) for mild symptoms, 13.0-15.0 mm(2) moderate symptoms and >15.0 mm(2) for severe patients). Nerve conduction studies were carried out, and severity of electrophysiological CTS impairment was reported as normal, mild, moderate, severe and extreme. The agreement between NCS and US in showing CTS severity (normal, mild, moderate and severe) was calculated with Cohen's kappa coefficient. Ninety-nine wrists of 54 patients (male/female: 4/50) were included in the study. Mean ages of patients were (+/-SD) 43.3 +/- 11 years. Forty-nine patients had idiopathic CTS, whereas five had secondary CTS (4 had diabetes mellitus and 1 had hypothyroidism). Symptoms were bilateral in 45 patients (83.3%). There were statistical differences between the groups according to electrophysiologic severity scale in terms of age (P < 0.001), body-mass index (P = 0.034), VAS (P = 0.014), Boston symptom severity (P = 0.013) and CSA of median nerve (P < 0.001). The identification of CTS severity showed substantial agreement (Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.619) between the US and NCS. Also the four groups based on US CTS severity classification were significantly different in VAS (P = 0.017) and Boston symptom severity (P = 0.021). The median nerve swelling detected by calculation of the CSA reflects in itself the degree of nerve damage as expressed by the clinical picture. In addition to CTS diagnosis, sonographic measurement of CSA could also give additional information about severity of median nerve involvement. Using of US may cost-effectively reduce the number of NCS in patients with suspected CTS.
虽然神经传导研究(NCS)是日常临床实践中最常用来确认腕管综合征(CTS)临床诊断的方法,但超声(US)测量正中神经横截面积对 CTS 的诊断具有敏感性和特异性。此外,还提出了一种基于正中神经 CSA 评估 CTS 严重程度的算法。本研究旨在探讨该算法在评估 CTS 严重程度方面的临床应用。患者接受了全面的临床检查,包括 Tinel 和 Phalen 试验,并询问了症状和 CTS 的继发原因。所有患者均填写了土耳其版 Levine Boston 腕管综合征问卷(BQ)和视觉模拟量表疼痛(VAS 0-100mm)。使用配备宽带 6-18MHz 线性换能器的 MyLab 70 US 系统(Esaote Biomedica,热那亚,意大利)进行 US 检查。在腕管近端入口处测量正中神经的横截面积(US 截断点可将不同严重程度的 CTS 区分开来,轻度症状为 10.0-13.0mm2,中度症状为 13.0-15.0mm2,严重症状为>15.0mm2)。进行神经传导研究,并报告电生理 CTS 损伤的严重程度为正常、轻度、中度、重度和极度。使用 Cohen 的 kappa 系数计算 NCS 和 US 在显示 CTS 严重程度(正常、轻度、中度和重度)方面的一致性。54 名患者的 99 只手腕(男/女:4/50)纳入研究。患者的平均年龄为(+/-SD)43.3 +/- 11 岁。49 例为特发性 CTS,5 例为继发性 CTS(4 例为糖尿病,1 例为甲状腺功能减退)。45 例(83.3%)为双侧症状。根据电生理严重程度量表,年龄(P < 0.001)、体重指数(P = 0.034)、VAS(P = 0.014)、波士顿症状严重程度(P = 0.013)和正中神经 CSA(P < 0.001)方面,各组间存在统计学差异。US 和 NCS 之间对 CTS 严重程度的识别具有中等一致性(Cohen 的 kappa 系数=0.619)。根据 US CTS 严重程度分类的四组在 VAS(P = 0.017)和波士顿症状严重程度(P = 0.021)方面也有显著差异。通过 CSA 计算检测到的正中神经肿胀本身反映了神经损伤的程度,如临床表现所示。除了 CTS 诊断外,超声测量 CSA 还可以提供有关正中神经受累严重程度的额外信息。在疑似 CTS 患者中使用 US 可能具有成本效益,可以减少 NCS 的数量。