Taipei, Linkou, and Taoyuan, Taiwan From the Department of Craniofacial Orthodontics, the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, and the Craniofacial Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, and the College of Medicine, Chang Gung University.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Dec;126(6):2074-2083. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f52710.
It has long been claimed that presurgical orthodontics is crucial to the outcome of surgical-orthodontic treatment for dentofacial deformity. However, in the literature, the effect of presurgical orthodontics on the treatment outcome remains controversial. The purpose of the study was therefore to investigate the effect of presurgical orthodontics on the treatment outcome in terms of facial aesthetics, occlusion, stability, and efficiency.
Thirty-three adult patients with skeletal class III open bite corrected by Le Fort I posterior impaction and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy were included. The patients were divided into two groups: 13 received presurgical orthodontics, and 20 did not. Cephalometric radiographs and study models were used to evaluate the treatment outcome.
There were no between-group differences in facial aesthetics, overbite, or Peer Assessment Rating score. Overjet was larger in the no-presurgical orthodontics group than in the presurgical orthodontics group, but both were within normal limits. Both groups had similar maxillary and horizontal mandibular stability. Although the vertical mandibular stability was worse in the no-presurgical orthodontics group than in the presurgical orthodontics group, the direction of instability was favorable for open bite correction. Finally, longer treatment time was required in the presurgical orthodontics group compared with the no-presurgical orthodontics group (512±103 days versus 342±127 days; p<0.001).
The results suggest that in surgical-orthodontic correction of skeletal class III open bite, presurgical orthodontics has no clinically significant effects on facial aesthetics, occlusion, or stability. However, presurgical orthodontics has a significant adverse effect on efficiency. Patients receiving presurgical orthodontics undergo longer treatment time than those receiving no presurgical orthodontics.
长期以来,人们一直声称术前正畸对于牙颌面畸形的手术-正畸治疗结果至关重要。然而,文献中,术前正畸对治疗结果的影响仍存在争议。因此,本研究旨在探讨术前正畸对颜面美学、咬合、稳定性和效率方面治疗结果的影响。
共纳入 33 例接受 Le Fort I 后向骨切开术和双侧矢状劈开截骨术治疗的成人骨骼 III 类开颌患者。将患者分为两组:13 例接受术前正畸,20 例未接受术前正畸。使用头颅侧位片和研究模型评估治疗结果。
两组间在颜面美学、覆合或专家评估分级方面无差异。未行术前正畸组的覆盖较行术前正畸组大,但均在正常范围内。两组上颌和水平下颌均具有相似的稳定性。虽然未行术前正畸组的下颌垂直稳定性较行术前正畸组差,但不稳定的方向有利于开颌的矫正。最后,行术前正畸组的治疗时间明显长于未行术前正畸组(512±103 天比 342±127 天;p<0.001)。
结果表明,在骨骼 III 类开颌的手术-正畸矫正中,术前正畸对颜面美学、咬合或稳定性无明显临床效果。但是,术前正畸对效率有显著的负面影响。接受术前正畸的患者治疗时间明显长于未接受术前正畸的患者。