Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 19;5(11):e14061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014061.
The epidemiology of leprosy is characterized by heterogeneity in susceptibility and clustering of disease within households. We aim to assess the extent to which different mechanisms for heterogeneity in leprosy susceptibility can explain household clustering as observed in a large study among contacts of leprosy patients.We used a microsimulation model, parameterizing it with data from over 20,000 contacts of leprosy patients in Bangladesh. We simulated six mechanisms producing heterogeneity in susceptibility: (1) susceptibility was allocated at random to persons (i.e. no additional mechanism), (2) a household factor, (3, 4) a genetic factor (dominant or recessive), or (5, 6) half a household factor and half genetic. We further assumed that a fraction of 5%, 10%, and 20% of the population was susceptible, leading to a total of 18 scenarios to be fitted to the data. We obtained an acceptable fit for each of the six mechanisms, thereby excluding none of the possible underlying mechanisms for heterogeneity of susceptibility to leprosy. However, the distribution of leprosy among contacts did differ between mechanisms, and predicted trends in the declining leprosy case detection were dependent on the assumed mechanism, with genetic-based susceptibility showing the slowest decline. Clustering of leprosy within households is partially caused by an increased transmission within households independent of the leprosy susceptibility mechanism. Even a large and detailed data set on contacts of leprosy patients could not unequivocally reveal the mechanism most likely responsible for heterogeneity in leprosy susceptibility.
麻风病的流行病学特点是易感性存在异质性,且疾病在家庭内呈聚集性分布。我们旨在评估麻风病易感性异质性的不同机制在多大程度上可以解释在麻风病患者接触者中进行的一项大型研究中观察到的家庭聚集现象。
我们使用了一个微观模拟模型,用来自孟加拉国 20000 多名麻风病接触者的数据对其进行了参数化。我们模拟了六种产生易感性异质性的机制:(1)将易感性随机分配给个体(即没有其他机制);(2)家庭因素;(3、4)遗传因素(显性或隐性);(5、6)一半家庭因素和一半遗传因素。我们进一步假设,有 5%、10%和 20%的人口具有易感性,因此共有 18 种情况需要拟合数据。我们对这六种机制都得到了可接受的拟合,从而排除了麻风病易感性异质性的任何潜在机制。然而,接触者中麻风病的分布因机制而异,预测的麻风病病例检出率下降趋势取决于假设的机制,具有遗传易感性的机制下降最慢。麻风病在家庭内的聚集部分是由于家庭内传播的增加,而与麻风病易感性机制无关。即使是一个关于麻风病患者接触者的大型和详细数据集也不能明确揭示最有可能导致麻风病易感性异质性的机制。