Department of Pharmacology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Curr Drug Targets. 2011 Feb;12(2):263-86. doi: 10.2174/138945011794182728.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an emerging clinical problem with multifaceted issues: current and expected prevalence, significant morbidity, potentially fatal outcome (e.g., stroke) and gaps in therapeutic approaches. Current anti-arrhythmic strategies not only fail to guarantee effective rhythm control, but also cause "on target" (i.e., pro-arrhythmia, namely torsade de pointes) and "off target" (i.e., extra-cardiac toxicities) side effects. Although a number of drugs have just come out of the pipeline with promising results (e.g., dronedarone), the question arises whether channel-targeted drugs represent the only viable approach. A body of evidence has emerged supporting structural remodeling as the main arrhythmogenic substrate perpetuating AF. Fibrosis, inflammation and oxidative stress appear strongly interconnected in the pathogenesis of remodeling-induced abnormalities. Moreover, insights into extracellular matrix network strongly suggested an active cross-talk within the cardiac microenvironment, which should be further investigated as promising "anti-remodeling" approach. Therefore, pharmacological modulation of non-ionic targets (the so called "upstream" therapy) has gained interest as a preventive strategy in AF. At the present state of knowledge, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers and statins offer evidence for potential clinical exploitation, while several remodeling-targeted therapies have been tested only experimentally or failed when studied for human validation. Fascinating and innovative strategies have been proposed (e.g., miRNAs modulation), but the actual benefit is debated. This review will provide mechanistic insights into structural remodeling and highlight emerging upstream strategies in AF management.
心房颤动(AF)是一个具有多方面问题的新兴临床问题:目前和预期的患病率、显著的发病率、潜在的致命后果(例如中风)以及治疗方法的差距。目前的抗心律失常策略不仅不能保证有效的节律控制,而且还会导致“靶向”(即致心律失常,即尖端扭转型室性心动过速)和“非靶向”(即心脏外毒性)副作用。尽管一些药物刚刚从管道中脱颖而出,结果令人鼓舞(例如,决奈达隆),但问题是靶向通道的药物是否代表唯一可行的方法。越来越多的证据支持结构重塑是维持 AF 的主要致心律失常基质。纤维化、炎症和氧化应激在重塑诱导的异常发病机制中似乎紧密相关。此外,对细胞外基质网络的深入了解强烈表明心脏微环境中存在活跃的交叉对话,这应该作为有前途的“抗重塑”方法进一步研究。因此,非离子靶点的药理学调节(所谓的“上游”治疗)作为 AF 的预防策略引起了关注。在目前的知识状态下,肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统阻滞剂和他汀类药物为潜在的临床应用提供了证据,而几种针对重塑的治疗方法仅在实验中进行了测试,或者在对人类进行验证时失败了。已经提出了一些引人入胜和创新的策略(例如,miRNAs 调节),但实际获益存在争议。本综述将提供结构重塑的机制见解,并强调 AF 管理中的新兴上游策略。