Suppr超能文献

比较脐带血解冻方法对细胞回收率、活力和输注的影响。

Comparison of cord blood thawing methods on cell recovery, potency, and infusion.

机构信息

The St Louis Cord Blood Bank at SSM Cardinal Glennon Children's Medical Center, St Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2010 Dec;50(12):2670-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02803.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Umbilical cord blood (UCB) products have traditionally been thawed using a washing method intended to stabilize the cells, reduce dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) toxicity, and remove potentially ABO-incompatible red blood cell (RBC) stroma and plasma. Concerns with this approach include loss of total nucleated cells (TNCs), bag breakage during centrifugation, and poor reproducibility by transplant centers unfamiliar with this technique. We rationalized that a simple 1:1 dilution without centrifugation would stabilize the product and reduce the DMSO concentration by 50%, allowing for a controlled thaw in the laboratory without the risks of cell loss.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We compared the traditional wash method with albumin reconstitution (dilution) and thaw only (no dilution or wash), assessing measurements of viability, TNC, CD34, and colony-forming cell (CFC) recovery post-thaw. Ten cryopreserved UCB products were thawed, split equally into three parts, and treated using each method. Product stability was measured at multiple time intervals up to 48hours post-thaw.

RESULTS

Throughout the entire evaluation, traditional wash and dilution methods performed equally well with no significant differences observed in 7-aminoactinomycin viability, TNC, CD34, or CFC recovery. For 163 patients in which diluted products were administered, there were no serious adverse effects at infusion and similar time to engraftment was observed when compared to historical experiences with traditional wash and direct infusion.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that removing DMSO, RBC stroma, and plasma post-thaw using a wash method is not necessary when UCB products are RBC and plasma reduced before cryopreservation.

摘要

背景

脐带血 (UCB) 制品传统上采用洗涤方法解冻,目的是稳定细胞、降低二甲基亚砜 (DMSO) 毒性,并去除潜在的 ABO 不相容的红细胞 (RBC) 基质和血浆。这种方法存在一些问题,包括总核细胞 (TNC) 丢失、离心过程中袋子破裂以及不熟悉该技术的移植中心重复性差。我们认为,简单的 1:1 稀释而不离心可以稳定产品,并将 DMSO 浓度降低 50%,从而在实验室中进行受控解冻,避免因细胞丢失带来的风险。

研究设计和方法

我们比较了传统的洗涤方法与白蛋白再构成(稀释)和仅解冻(不稀释或洗涤),评估解冻后细胞活力、TNC、CD34 和集落形成细胞 (CFC) 回收率的测量值。将 10 个冷冻保存的 UCB 制品解冻,平均分成三份,分别用每种方法处理。在解冻后多达 48 小时的多个时间点测量产品稳定性。

结果

在整个评估过程中,传统的洗涤和稀释方法表现相当,7-氨基放线菌素活力、TNC、CD34 或 CFC 回收率没有观察到显著差异。在输注时,对于接受稀释制品的 163 名患者,没有出现严重的不良反应,与传统洗涤和直接输注的历史经验相比,植入时间相似。

结论

我们得出结论,当 UCB 制品在冷冻保存前已经减少 RBC 和血浆时,解冻后使用洗涤方法去除 DMSO、RBC 基质和血浆是不必要的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验