Suppr超能文献

子宫内暴露于卡马西平与特定先天性畸形:系统评价与病例对照研究。

Intrauterine exposure to carbamazepine and specific congenital malformations: systematic review and case-control study.

机构信息

Department of PharmacoEpidemiology and PharmacoEconomics, Division of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ. 2010 Dec 2;341:c6581. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c6581.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify specific major congenital malformations associated with use of carbamazepine in the first trimester of pregnancy.

DESIGN

A review of all published cohort studies to identify key indications and a population based case-control study to test these indications.

SETTING

Review of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for papers about carbamazepine exposure in the first trimester of pregnancy and specific malformations, and the EUROCAT Antiepileptic Study Database, including data from 19 European population based congenital anomaly registries, 1995-2005.

PARTICIPANTS

The literature review covered eight cohort studies of 2680 pregnancies with carbamazepine monotherapy exposure, and the EUROCAT dataset included 98 075 registrations of malformations covering over 3.8 million births.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall prevalence for a major congenital malformation after exposure to carbamazepine monotherapy in the first trimester. Odds ratios for malformations with exposure to carbamazepine among cases (five types of malformation identified in the literature review) compared with two groups of controls: other non-chromosomal registrations of malformations and chromosomal syndromes.

RESULTS

The literature review yielded an overall prevalence for a major congenital malformation of 3.3% (95% confidence interval 2.7 to 4.2) after exposure to carbamazepine monotherapy in the first trimester. In 131 registrations of malformations, the fetus had been exposed to carbamazepine monotherapy. Spina bifida was the only specific major congenital malformation significantly associated with exposure to carbamazepine monotherapy (odds ratio 2.6 (95% confidence interval 1.2 to 5.3) compared with no antiepileptic drug), but the risk was smaller for carbamazepine than for valproic acid (0.2, 0.1 to 0.6). There was no evidence for an association with total anomalous pulmonary venous return (no cases with carbamazepine exposure), cleft lip (with or without palate) (0.2, 0.0 to 1.3), diaphragmatic hernia (0.9, 0.1 to 6.6), or hypospadias (0.7, 0.3 to 1.6) compared with no exposure to antiepileptic drugs. Further exploratory analysis suggested a higher risk of single ventricle and atrioventricular septal defect.

CONCLUSION

Carbamazepine teratogenicity is relatively specific to spina bifida, though the risk is less than with valproic acid. Despite the large dataset, there was not enough power to detect moderate risks for some rare major congenital malformations.

摘要

目的

确定与妊娠早期使用卡马西平相关的特定重大先天畸形。

设计

对所有已发表的队列研究进行综述,以确定关键适应证,并进行基于人群的病例对照研究以检验这些适应证。

环境

在 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Embase 上检索有关妊娠早期卡马西平暴露和特定畸形的论文,并检索 EUROCAT 抗癫痫研究数据库,该数据库包括来自 19 个基于人群的先天畸形登记处的数据,时间范围为 1995-2005 年。

参与者

文献综述涵盖了 8 项队列研究,共 2680 例单药治疗妊娠暴露于卡马西平的病例,EUROCAT 数据集包括 98075 例畸形登记病例,涵盖了超过 380 万例出生。

主要观察指标

妊娠早期单药治疗卡马西平后出现重大先天畸形的总体发生率。与两个对照组相比,暴露于卡马西平的病例(文献综述中确定的五种畸形类型)发生畸形的优势比:其他非染色体畸形登记和染色体综合征。

结果

文献综述显示,妊娠早期单药治疗卡马西平后,重大先天畸形的总体发生率为 3.3%(95%置信区间为 2.7%至 4.2%)。在 131 例畸形病例中,胎儿曾暴露于卡马西平单药治疗。与未用抗癫痫药物相比,只有脊柱裂是与卡马西平单药治疗明显相关的特定重大先天畸形(比值比 2.6(95%置信区间为 1.2 至 5.3)),但风险小于丙戊酸(0.2,0.1 至 0.6)。与未用抗癫痫药物相比,没有证据表明总肺静脉异常回流(无卡马西平暴露病例)、唇裂(伴或不伴腭裂)(0.2,0.0 至 1.3)、膈疝(0.9,0.1 至 6.6)或尿道下裂(0.7,0.3 至 1.6)相关。进一步的探索性分析表明,单心室和房室间隔缺损的风险更高。

结论

卡马西平的致畸性相对特异于脊柱裂,但其风险小于丙戊酸。尽管数据集很大,但对于一些罕见的重大先天畸形,其检测中度风险的能力仍不足。

相似文献

2
Monotherapy treatment of epilepsy in pregnancy: congenital malformation outcomes in the child.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 7;11(11):CD010224. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010224.pub2.
3
Monotherapy treatment of epilepsy in pregnancy: congenital malformation outcomes in the child.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 29;8(8):CD010224. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010224.pub3.
4
Carbamazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 27;2(2):CD001911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001911.pub3.
6
Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 28;6(6):CD001031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001031.pub4.
7
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 15;12(12):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub3.
8
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 29;6(6):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub2.
9
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub4.
10
Valproic acid monotherapy in pregnancy and major congenital malformations.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 10;362(23):2185-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907328.

引用本文的文献

2
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Psychiatry: Enhancing Treatment Precision and Patient Outcomes.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 May 16;17(5):642. doi: 10.3390/ph17050642.
3
Three Decades of Valproate: A Current Model for Studying Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2024;22(2):260-289. doi: 10.2174/1570159X22666231003121513.
4
[Guidelines for the management of adverse effects of anti-seizure medications (2023)].
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2023;25(9):889-900. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2306016.
5
Monotherapy treatment of epilepsy in pregnancy: congenital malformation outcomes in the child.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 29;8(8):CD010224. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010224.pub3.
6
8
Prenatal Carbamazepine Exposure and Academic Performance in Adolescents: A Population-Based Cohort Study.
Neurology. 2023 Feb 14;100(7):e728-e738. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201529. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
9
Effects of Maternal Use of Antiseizure Medications on Child Development.
Neurol Clin. 2022 Nov;40(4):755-768. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2022.03.006. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
10
Review of evidence for environmental causes of uveal coloboma.
Surv Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul-Aug;67(4):1031-1047. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2021.12.008. Epub 2021 Dec 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Valproic acid monotherapy in pregnancy and major congenital malformations.
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 10;362(23):2185-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907328.
3
Does lamotrigine use in pregnancy increase orofacial cleft risk relative to other malformations?
Neurology. 2008 Sep 2;71(10):714-22. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000316194.98475.d8. Epub 2008 Jul 23.
4
Changing Australian prescribing patterns for antiepileptic drugs in pregnancy and their possible consequences.
J Clin Neurosci. 2007 Jul;14(7):611-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2006.04.025. Epub 2007 Apr 2.
5
In utero antiepileptic drug exposure: fetal death and malformations.
Neurology. 2006 Aug 8;67(3):407-12. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000227919.81208.b2.
6
Neuroteratogens in man: an overview with special emphasis on the teratogenicity of antiepileptic drugs in pregnancy.
Reprod Toxicol. 2006 Aug;22(2):214-26. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2006.03.014. Epub 2006 Apr 18.
7
Dysmorphic features: an important clue to the diagnosis and severity of fetal anticonvulsant syndromes.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006 Mar;91(2):F90-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.067421. Epub 2005 Oct 20.
8
Birth defects after prenatal exposure to antiepileptic drugs.
Lancet Neurol. 2005 Nov;4(11):781-6. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70224-6.
9
Malformation risks of antiepileptic drugs in pregnancy: a prospective study from the UK Epilepsy and Pregnancy Register.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 Feb;77(2):193-8. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.074203. Epub 2005 Sep 12.
10
Navigating toward fetal and maternal health: the challenge of treating epilepsy in pregnancy.
Epilepsia. 2004 Oct;45(10):1171-5. doi: 10.1111/j.0013-9580.2004.15104.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验