• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理健康部分护理项目中效率和效果的组织决定因素。

Organizational determinants of efficiency and effectiveness in mental health partial care programs.

作者信息

Schinnar A P, Kamis-Gould E, Delucia N, Rothbard A B

机构信息

Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104-6197.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 1990 Jun;25(2):387-420.

PMID:2113046
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1065634/
Abstract

The use of partial care as a treatment modality for mentally ill patients, particularly the chronically mentally ill, has greatly increased. However, research into what constitutes a "good" program has been scant. This article reports on an evaluation study of staff productivity, cost efficiency, and service effectiveness of adult partial care programs carried out in New Jersey in fiscal year 1984/1985. Five program performance indexes are developed based on comparisons of multiple measures of resources, service activities, and client outcomes. These are used to test various hypotheses regarding the effect of organizational and fiscal variables on partial care program efficiency and effectiveness. The four issues explored are: auspices, organizational complexity, service mix, and fiscal control by the state. These were found to explain about half of the variance in program performance. In addition, partial care programs demonstrating midlevel performance with regard to productivity and efficiency were observed to be the most effective, implying a possible optimal level of efficiency at which effectiveness is maximized.

摘要

作为一种针对精神病患者,尤其是慢性精神病患者的治疗方式,部分护理的使用已大幅增加。然而,对于构成一个“优质”项目的要素的研究却很少。本文报告了一项于1984/1985财政年度在新泽西州开展的针对成人部分护理项目的员工生产力、成本效益和服务效果的评估研究。基于对资源、服务活动和客户结果的多种衡量指标的比较,制定了五个项目绩效指标。这些指标用于检验关于组织和财政变量对部分护理项目效率和效果的影响的各种假设。所探讨的四个问题是:主办机构、组织复杂性、服务组合以及州政府的财政控制。结果发现,这些因素解释了项目绩效约一半的差异。此外,观察到在生产力和效率方面表现为中等水平的部分护理项目是最有效的,这意味着可能存在一个使效果最大化的最佳效率水平。

相似文献

1
Organizational determinants of efficiency and effectiveness in mental health partial care programs.心理健康部分护理项目中效率和效果的组织决定因素。
Health Serv Res. 1990 Jun;25(2):387-420.
2
Pursuing cost-effectiveness in mental health service delivery for youth with complex needs.为有复杂需求的青少年提供心理健康服务时追求成本效益。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2011 Jun;14(2):73-83.
3
A model for evaluating intensive outpatient behavioral health care programs.一种评估强化门诊行为健康护理项目的模型。
Psychiatr Serv. 1996 Nov;47(11):1227-32. doi: 10.1176/ps.47.11.1227.
4
Variation in outpatient mental health service utilization under capitation.按人头付费情况下门诊心理健康服务利用的差异。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2005 Mar;8(1):3-14.
5
Organizational and client determinants of cost in outpatient substance abuse treatment.门诊药物滥用治疗中成本的组织和客户决定因素。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2007 Mar;10(1):3-13.
6
Day hospital/crisis respite care versus inpatient care, Part II: Service utilization and costs.日间医院/危机缓解护理与住院护理,第二部分:服务利用与成本
Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Aug;153(8):1074-83. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.8.1074.
7
A combined inpatient and partial hospital program.
Psychiatr Serv. 1997 Feb;48(2):242-4. doi: 10.1176/ps.48.2.242.
8
Development of a drop-in service in a small community team: continuing care to clients with long-term mental health problems.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 1995;2(1):49-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.1995.tb00167.x.
9
Evaluation of intensive case management for seriously and persistently mentally ill persons.对严重且持续性精神疾病患者的强化个案管理评估。
J Case Manag. 1993 Summer;2(2):59-65.
10
An analysis of the effects of organization and financing on the utilization and costs of public mental health services in san diego county.圣地亚哥县公共心理健康服务的组织与融资对服务利用及成本的影响分析。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2007 Sep;10(3):123-32.

引用本文的文献

1
Mental health services implementation in Colombia-A systematic review.哥伦比亚心理健康服务的实施——一项系统综述
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Dec 6;3(12):e0001565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001565. eCollection 2023.
2
Measuring the Efficiency of Health Systems: A Case of Mental Health in Middle East and North Africa Countries.衡量卫生系统的效率:以中东和北非国家的心理健康为例。
Iran J Public Health. 2021 May;50(5):1017-1027. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i5.6119.
3
A multiple stage approach for performance improvement of primary healthcare practice.多阶段方法提高基层医疗实践绩效。
J Med Syst. 2011 Oct;35(5):1015-28. doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9438-7. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
4
Non-parametric and parametric applications measuring efficiency in health care.测量医疗保健效率的非参数和参数应用。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2003 Nov;6(4):203-18. doi: 10.1023/a:1026255523228.
5
Efficiency measurement of health care: a review of non-parametric methods and applications.医疗保健的效率测量:非参数方法及其应用综述
Health Care Manag Sci. 1999 Jul;2(3):161-72. doi: 10.1023/a:1019087828488.
6
Managed care and technical efficiency in outpatient substance abuse treatment units.门诊药物滥用治疗单位的管理式医疗与技术效率
J Behav Health Serv Res. 1998 Nov;25(4):377-96. doi: 10.1007/BF02287509.
7
Efficiency evaluation of community-based youth services in Virginia.弗吉尼亚州社区青少年服务的效率评估
Community Ment Health J. 1997 Dec;33(6):487-99. doi: 10.1023/a:1025096502578.
8
Mental health case management and technical efficiency.心理健康个案管理与技术效率。
J Med Syst. 1995 Oct;19(5):413-23. doi: 10.1007/BF02260831.
9
Trends in Department of Defense hospital efficiency.美国国防部医院效率趋势
J Med Syst. 1994 Apr;18(2):69-83. doi: 10.1007/BF00999453.

本文引用的文献

1
The New Jersey performance management system: a state system and uses of simple measures.新泽西绩效管理系统:一种州级系统及简单指标的应用
Eval Program Plann. 1987;10(3):249-55. doi: 10.1016/0149-7189(87)90036-x.
2
Selection criteria for partial hospitalization.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1982 Nov;33(11):929-33. doi: 10.1176/ps.33.11.929.
3
Measuring routine nursing service efficiency: a comparison of cost per patient day and data envelopment analysis models.衡量常规护理服务效率:按每日每位患者成本与数据包络分析模型的比较
Health Serv Res. 1983 Summer;18(2 Pt 1):183-208.
4
Partial hospitalization: state of the art.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1982 Nov;33(11):923-8. doi: 10.1176/ps.33.11.923.
5
Hospital efficiency measurement and evaluation. Empirical test of a new technique.医院效率测量与评估。一项新技术的实证检验。
Med Care. 1984 Oct;22(10):922-38. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198410000-00005.
6
The evolution of an acute day treatment program.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1980 Dec;31(12):826-8. doi: 10.1176/ps.31.12.826.
7
Chronic psychiatric patients in the day hospital.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1967 Nov;17(5):615-21. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1967.01730290103013.
8
A controlled evaluation of day hospital effectiveness.日间医院疗效的对照评估。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1969 Mar;20(3):329-38. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1969.01740150073011.
9
Day versus inpatient hospitalization: a controlled study.日间治疗与住院治疗:一项对照研究。
Am J Psychiatry. 1971 Apr;127(10):1371-82. doi: 10.1176/ajp.127.10.1371.
10
Systems approach to day hospitalization.日间住院的系统方法。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1970 Jun;22(6):550-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1970.01740300070009.