• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国国防部医院效率趋势

Trends in Department of Defense hospital efficiency.

作者信息

Ozcan Y A, Bannick R R

机构信息

Department of Health Administration, Medical College of Virginia Campus, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond 23298-0203.

出版信息

J Med Syst. 1994 Apr;18(2):69-83. doi: 10.1007/BF00999453.

DOI:10.1007/BF00999453
PMID:7964214
Abstract

This study employs a simple cross sectional design using longitudinal data to explore the underlying factors associated with differences in hospital technical efficiency using data envelopment analysis (DEA) in the Department of Defense (DOD) sector across three service components, the Army, Air Force and Navy. The results suggest that the services do not differ significantly in hospital efficiency. Nor does hospital efficiency appear to differ over time. With respect to the efficient use of input resources, the services experienced a general decline in excessive usage of various inputs over the three years. Analysis of the returns to scale captures opportunities for planners of changing the relative mix of output to input slacks for increasing a hospital's efficiency. That is, policy makers would get more immediate "bang per buck" with emphasis on improving the efficiencies of hospitals with higher returns to scale than other hospitals. Findings also suggest a significant degree of comparability between the DEA measure and these measures often used to indicate efficiency.

摘要

本研究采用简单的横断面设计,利用纵向数据,通过数据包络分析(DEA),探讨国防部(DOD)部门中陆军、空军和海军三个军种医院技术效率差异的潜在因素。结果表明,各军种在医院效率方面没有显著差异。医院效率似乎也没有随时间变化。在投入资源的有效利用方面,各军种在三年中各类投入的过度使用普遍有所下降。规模收益分析为规划者提供了机会,可通过改变产出与投入松弛量的相对组合来提高医院效率。也就是说,政策制定者若着重提高规模收益较高医院的效率,将能获得更直接的“性价比”提升。研究结果还表明,DEA指标与这些常用于衡量效率的指标之间具有显著的可比性。

相似文献

1
Trends in Department of Defense hospital efficiency.美国国防部医院效率趋势
J Med Syst. 1994 Apr;18(2):69-83. doi: 10.1007/BF00999453.
2
Efficiency analysis of federally funded hospitals: comparison of DoD and VA hospitals using data envelopment analysis.联邦资助医院的效率分析:使用数据包络分析对国防部医院和退伍军人事务部医院进行比较
Health Serv Manage Res. 1995 May;8(2):73-85. doi: 10.1177/095148489500800201.
3
Evaluating relative efficiencies of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers using data envelopment, ratio, and multiple regression analysis.使用数据包络分析、比率分析和多元回归分析评估退伍军人事务医疗中心的相对效率。
J Med Syst. 1994 Apr;18(2):55-67. doi: 10.1007/BF00999452.
4
Evaluating the Impact of Hospital Efficiency on Wellness in the Military Health System.评估医院效率对军事医疗系统中健康状况的影响。
Mil Med. 2016 Aug;181(8):827-34. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00309.
5
Estimating technical efficiency in the hospital sector with panel data: a comparison of parametric and non-parametric techniques.利用面板数据估计医院部门的技术效率:参数法与非参数法的比较
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2006;5(2):99-116. doi: 10.2165/00148365-200605020-00004.
6
Measuring efficiency among US federal hospitals.衡量美国联邦医院的效率。
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2014 Apr-Jun;33(2):117-27. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0000000000000005.
7
Investigating health system performance: an application of data envelopment analysis to Zambian hospitals.调查卫生系统绩效:数据包络分析在赞比亚医院的应用
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Apr 25;7:58. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-58.
8
How efficient are referral hospitals in Uganda? A data envelopment analysis and tobit regression approach.乌干达的转诊医院效率如何?数据包络分析和托比特回归方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 8;16:230. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1472-9.
9
Data envelopment analysis comparison of hospital efficiency and quality.医院效率与质量的数据包络分析比较
J Med Syst. 2008 Jun;32(3):193-9. doi: 10.1007/s10916-007-9122-8.
10
Evaluation of performance and impacts of maternal and child health hospital services using Data Envelopment Analysis in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China: a comparison study among poverty and non-poverty county level hospitals.运用数据包络分析法对中国广西壮族自治区妇幼保健院服务的绩效与影响进行评估:贫困与非贫困县级医院的比较研究
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Aug 23;15(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0420-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Overall Technical Efficiency, Pure Technical Efficiency, and Scale Efficiency of United States Department of Defense Hospitals.评估美国国防部医院的总体技术效率、纯技术效率和规模效率。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Dec 21;17:3267-3289. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S491139. eCollection 2024.
2
Stochastic multi-objective auto-optimization for resource allocation decision-making in fixed-input health systems.固定投入卫生系统资源配置决策的随机多目标自动优化。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2017 Jun;20(2):246-264. doi: 10.1007/s10729-015-9350-2. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
3
Efficiency of federal hospitals in the United States.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring hospital performance. A non-parametric approach.衡量医院绩效:一种非参数方法
J Health Econ. 1987 Jun;6(2):89-107. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(87)90001-4.
2
The CHAMPUS reform initiative: tailoring private-sector innovations to public-sector needs.《军队医疗保健计划》改革倡议:使私营部门的创新适应公共部门的需求。
Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 1988;9:247-65.
3
Efficiency analysis of federally funded hospitals: comparison of DoD and VA hospitals using data envelopment analysis.联邦资助医院的效率分析:使用数据包络分析对国防部医院和退伍军人事务部医院进行比较
美国联邦医院的效率。
J Med Syst. 2004 Oct;28(5):411-22. doi: 10.1023/b:joms.0000041168.28200.8c.
4
Using data envelopment analysis to measure the technical efficiency of public health centers in Kenya.运用数据包络分析来衡量肯尼亚公共卫生中心的技术效率。
J Med Syst. 2004 Apr;28(2):155-66. doi: 10.1023/b:joms.0000023298.31972.c9.
5
Non-parametric and parametric applications measuring efficiency in health care.测量医疗保健效率的非参数和参数应用。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2003 Nov;6(4):203-18. doi: 10.1023/a:1026255523228.
6
Tutorial on technology transfer and survey design and data collection for measuring Internet and Intranet existence, usage, and impact (survey-2000) in acute care hospitals in the United States.关于美国急症护理医院互联网和内联网的存在、使用及影响测量(2000年调查)的技术转让、调查设计与数据收集教程
J Med Syst. 2001 Feb;25(1):27-45. doi: 10.1023/a:1005684215664.
7
Efficiency measurement of health care: a review of non-parametric methods and applications.医疗保健的效率测量:非参数方法及其应用综述
Health Care Manag Sci. 1999 Jul;2(3):161-72. doi: 10.1023/a:1019087828488.
8
Trends in hospital efficiency among metropolitan markets.大都市市场中医院效率的趋势。
J Med Syst. 1999 Apr;23(2):83-97. doi: 10.1023/a:1020585118381.
9
Impact of information systems on acute care hospitals: results from a survey in the United States.信息系统对急症医院的影响:美国一项调查的结果
J Med Syst. 1998 Dec;22(6):379-87. doi: 10.1023/a:1020614208753.
10
Survey of acute care hospitals in the United States relative to technology usage and technology transfer.美国急性护理医院技术使用与技术转移情况调查。
J Med Syst. 1997 Oct;21(5):323-36. doi: 10.1023/a:1022876709762.
Health Serv Manage Res. 1995 May;8(2):73-85. doi: 10.1177/095148489500800201.
4
Restructuring military health care: the winds of change blow stronger.重塑军事医疗保健:变革之风愈刮愈劲。
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1993 Spring;38(1):121-32.
5
Contract management and institutional cost control.合同管理与机构成本控制。
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1992 Spring;37(1):115-30.
6
Defense Dept.'s cost-cutting could forge new civilian links.国防部的成本削减可能会建立新的民用联系。
Mod Healthc. 1991 May 6;21(18):34.
7
Preparing for the downsizing and closure of Letterman Army Medical Center: a case study.为利文沃思堡陆军医疗中心的缩编与关闭做准备:一个案例研究
Mil Med. 1993 Feb;158(2):84-90.
8
Satisfaction and dissatisfaction in institutional practice: results from a survey of U.S. military physicians.机构实践中的满意度与不满意度:美国军队医生调查结果
Mil Med. 1993 Jan;158(1):41-50.
9
Measuring routine nursing service efficiency: a comparison of cost per patient day and data envelopment analysis models.衡量常规护理服务效率:按每日每位患者成本与数据包络分析模型的比较
Health Serv Res. 1983 Summer;18(2 Pt 1):183-208.
10
Competition's impact: a report from the front.竞争的影响:来自前线的报告。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1988 Summer;7(3):162-73. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.7.3.162.