Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, 100 Bridgeside Point, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USA.
Sci Total Environ. 2011 Jan 15;409(4):676-85. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.07.092. Epub 2010 Dec 4.
An aquatic hazard assessment establishes a derived predicted no effect concentration (PNEC) below which it is assumed that aquatic organisms will not suffer adverse effects from exposure to a chemical. An aquatic hazard assessment of the endocrine disruptor Bisphenol A [BPA; 2, 2-bis (4-hydroxyphenyl) propane] was conducted using a weight of evidence approach, using the ecotoxicological endpoints of survival, growth and development and reproduction. New evidence has emerged that suggests that the aquatic system may not be sufficiently protected from adverse effects of BPA exposure at the current PNEC value of 100 μg/L. It is with this background that; 1) An aquatic hazard assessment for BPA using a weight of evidence approach, was conducted, 2) A PNEC value was derived using a non parametric hazardous concentration for 5% of the specie (HC(5)) approach and, 3) The derived BPA hazard assessment values were compared to aquatic environmental concentrations for BPA to determine, sufficient protectiveness from BPA exposure for aquatic species. A total of 61 studies yielded 94 no observed effect concentration (NOEC) and a toxicity dataset, which suggests that the aquatic effects of mortality, growth and development and reproduction are most likely to occur between the concentrations of 0.0483 μg/L and 2280 μg/L. This finding is within the range for aquatic adverse estrogenic effects reported in the literature. A PNEC of 0.06 μg/L was calculated. The 95% confidence interval was found to be (0.02, 3.40) μg/L. Thus, using the weight of evidence approach based on repeated measurements of these endpoints, the results indicate that currently observed BPA concentrations in surface waters exceed this newly derived PNEC value of 0.06 μg/L. This indicates that some aquatic receptors may be at risk for adverse effects on survival, growth and development and reproduction from BPA exposure at environmentally relevant concentrations.
水生生物危害评估确定了一个推断的无效应浓度(PNEC),在此浓度以下,水生生物预计不会因接触化学物质而遭受不良影响。采用证据权重法对内分泌干扰物双酚 A [BPA;2,2- 双(4- 羟苯基)丙烷]进行了水生生物危害评估,使用了生存、生长发育和繁殖等生态毒理学终点。新出现的证据表明,在当前的 100μg/L 的 PNEC 值下,水生系统可能没有得到充分保护,免受 BPA 暴露的不良影响。正是基于这一背景:1)采用证据权重法对 BPA 进行了水生生物危害评估,2)采用非参数物种 5%有害浓度(HC(5))方法推导了 PNEC 值,3)将推导的 BPA 危害评估值与 BPA 的水生环境浓度进行了比较,以确定水生物种对 BPA 暴露的充分保护程度。共有 61 项研究提供了 94 个无观察效应浓度(NOEC)和毒性数据集,这表明死亡率、生长发育和繁殖等水生效应最有可能发生在 0.0483μg/L 和 2280μg/L 之间。这一发现处于文献报道的水生雌激素不良效应范围内。计算得出的 PNEC 值为 0.06μg/L。95%置信区间为(0.02,3.40)μg/L。因此,基于这些终点的重复测量,采用证据权重法得出的结果表明,目前在地表水中观察到的 BPA 浓度超过了新推导的 0.06μg/L 的 PNEC 值。这表明,在环境相关浓度下,一些水生受体可能面临因 BPA 暴露而导致生存、生长发育和繁殖不良影响的风险。