• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reduction in physician reimbursement and use of hormone therapy in prostate cancer.减少医生报酬和前列腺癌激素治疗的应用。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Dec 15;102(24):1826-34. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq417. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
2
Medicare reimbursement and prescribing hormone therapy for prostate cancer.医疗保险报销与前列腺癌激素治疗的处方
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Dec 15;102(24):1814-5. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq467. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
3
Survival following primary androgen deprivation therapy among men with localized prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌男性患者接受初次雄激素剥夺治疗后的生存率
JAMA. 2008 Jul 9;300(2):173-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.2.173.
4
Factors associated with reduction in use of neoadjuvant androgen suppression therapy before radical prostatectomy.与根治性前列腺切除术前新辅助雄激素抑制治疗减少相关的因素。
Urology. 2013 Apr;81(4):745-51. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.12.044.
5
Three-dimensional external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer increases the risk of hip fracture.三维适形外照射放疗前列腺癌会增加髋部骨折的风险。
Cancer. 2011 Oct 1;117(19):4557-65. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25994. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
6
Fifteen-year survival outcomes following primary androgen-deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer.局限性前列腺癌行初始雄激素剥夺治疗后 15 年的生存结果。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Sep;174(9):1460-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3028.
7
[Combined treatment of metastatic hormone-resistant prostate cancer].[转移性激素抵抗性前列腺癌的联合治疗]
Vopr Onkol. 2009;55(4):477-9.
8
Total androgen blockade versus a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist alone in men with high-risk prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy.高危前列腺癌患者接受放疗时,联合雄激素阻断与单独使用黄体生成素释放激素激动剂的疗效比较。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Apr;76(5):1439-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.034. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
9
Biochemical outcome following external beam radiation therapy with or without androgen suppression therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.对于临床局限性前列腺癌,接受或未接受雄激素抑制治疗的外照射放疗后的生化结果。
JAMA. 2000 Sep 13;284(10):1280-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.10.1280.
10
Is primary prostate cancer treatment influenced by likelihood of extraprostatic disease? A surveillance, epidemiology and end results patterns of care study.原发前列腺癌的治疗是否受前列腺外疾病可能性的影响?监测、流行病学和最终结果的治疗模式研究。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Sep 1;84(1):88-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.076. Epub 2012 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Urologist practice divestment from radiation vault ownership and treatment patterns for prostate cancer.泌尿科医生放弃对放射库的所有权和前列腺癌的治疗模式。
Cancer. 2024 May 1;130(9):1609-1617. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35168. Epub 2023 Dec 26.
2
Neuroendocrine Carcinoma as an Independent Prognostic Factor for Patients With Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Study.神经内分泌癌作为前列腺癌患者的独立预后因素:一项基于人群的研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Dec 8;12:778758. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.778758. eCollection 2021.
3
Perceived barriers to the adoption of active surveillance in low-risk prostate cancer: a qualitative analysis of community and academic urologists.低风险前列腺癌采用主动监测的认知障碍:社区和学术泌尿外科医生的定性分析
BMC Cancer. 2021 May 31;21(1):649. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08386-3.
4
Medicare fee reductions and the overuse of intensity-modulated radiotherapy.医疗保险费用削减与调强放疗的过度使用。
Health Serv Res. 2021 Aug;56(4):626-634. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13663. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
5
Current attitudes of Canadian urologists towards surgical castration in the treatment of prostate cancer.加拿大泌尿外科医生对手术去势治疗前列腺癌的当前态度。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 May;15(5):E281-E285. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6834.
6
Promotional Payments Made to Urologists by the Pharmaceutical Industry and Prescribing Patterns for Targeted Therapies.医药行业向泌尿科医生支付的促销款项与靶向治疗药物的处方模式。
Urology. 2021 Feb;148:134-140. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.080. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
7
The impact of provider payment reforms and associated care delivery models on cost and quality in cancer care: A systematic literature review.医疗机构支付方式改革及其相关医疗服务模式对癌症医疗成本和质量的影响:系统文献回顾。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 5;14(4):e0214382. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214382. eCollection 2019.
8
Association Between Reimbursement Incentives and Physician Practice in Oncology: A Systematic Review.医保激励与肿瘤医师行医行为的关联:系统评价
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;5(6):893-899. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6196.
9
Trends in Antineoplastic Receipt after Medicare Payment Reform: Implications for Future Oncology Payment Design.医疗保险支付改革后抗肿瘤药物使用趋势:对未来肿瘤学支付设计的影响
J Cancer Policy. 2018 Sep;17:51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpo.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
10
Use of the Medicare database in epidemiologic and health services research: a valuable source of real-world evidence on the older and disabled populations in the US.医疗保险数据库在流行病学和卫生服务研究中的应用:美国老年人和残疾人群体真实世界证据的宝贵来源。
Clin Epidemiol. 2017 May 9;9:267-277. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S105613. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2005.2003年至2005年美国根治性前列腺切除术的护理模式。
J Urol. 2008 Nov;180(5):1969-74. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.07.054. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
2
Androgen deprivation falls as orchiectomy rates rise after changes in reimbursement in the U.S. Medicare population.在美国医疗保险人群中,报销政策改变后,随着睾丸切除术比例上升,雄激素剥夺治疗率下降。
Cancer. 2008 May 15;112(10):2195-201. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23421.
3
Use of androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic prostate cancer in older men.老年男性转移性前列腺癌雄激素剥夺疗法的应用。
BJU Int. 2008 May;101(9):1077-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07405.x. Epub 2008 Jan 8.
4
Intermittent versus continuous androgen suppression for prostatic cancer.间歇性雄激素抑制与持续性雄激素抑制治疗前列腺癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;2007(4):CD005009. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005009.pub2.
5
Reimbursement issues with hormonal therapies for prostate cancer.前列腺癌激素疗法的报销问题。
Rev Urol. 2005;7 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S44-7.
6
Diabetes and cardiovascular disease during androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.前列腺癌雄激素剥夺治疗期间的糖尿病和心血管疾病
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Sep 20;24(27):4448-56. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.06.2497.
7
Metabolic syndrome in men with prostate cancer undergoing long-term androgen-deprivation therapy.接受长期雄激素剥夺治疗的前列腺癌男性患者的代谢综合征
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Aug 20;24(24):3979-83. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.05.9741.
8
Does reimbursement influence chemotherapy treatment for cancer patients?报销会影响癌症患者的化疗治疗吗?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Mar-Apr;25(2):437-43. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.2.437.
9
Caveat medicus: consequences of federal investigations of marketing activities of pharmaceutical suppliers of prostate cancer drugs.医生须知:联邦政府对前列腺癌药物供应商营销活动进行调查的后果
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 1;23(34):8894-905. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.4605.
10
Increasing use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for the treatment of localized prostate carcinoma.促性腺激素释放激素激动剂在局限性前列腺癌治疗中的应用日益增加。
Cancer. 2005 Apr 15;103(8):1615-24. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20955.

减少医生报酬和前列腺癌激素治疗的应用。

Reduction in physician reimbursement and use of hormone therapy in prostate cancer.

机构信息

Department of Urologic Surgery, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, MMC 394, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Dec 15;102(24):1826-34. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq417. Epub 2010 Dec 3.

DOI:10.1093/jnci/djq417
PMID:21131577
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3001964/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Use of androgen suppression therapy (AST) in prostate cancer increased more than threefold from 1991 to 1999. The 2003 Medicare Modernization Act reduced reimbursements for AST by 64% between 2004 and 2005, but the effect of this large reduction on use of AST is unknown.

METHODS

A cohort of 72,818 men diagnosed with prostate cancer in 1992-2005 was identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. From Medicare claims data, indicated AST was defined as 3 months or more of AST in the first year in men with metastatic disease (n = 8030). Non-indicated AST was defined as AST given without other therapies such as radical prostatectomy or radiation in men with low-risk disease (n = 64,788). The unadjusted annual proportion of men receiving AST was plotted against the median Medicare AST reimbursement. A multivariable model was used to estimate the odds of AST use in men with low-risk and metastatic disease, with the predictor of interest being the calendar year of the payment change. Covariates in the model included age in 5-year categories, clinical tumor stage (T1-T4), World Health Organization grade (1-3, unknown), Charlson comorbidity (0, 1, 2, ≥ 3), race, education, income, and tumor registry site, all as categorical variables. The models included variations in the definition of AST use (≥ 1, ≥ 3, and ≥ 6 months of AST). All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

AST use in the low-risk group peaked at 10.2% in 2003, then declined to 7.1% in 2004 and 6.1% in 2005. After adjusting for tumor and demographic covariates, the odds of receiving non-indicated primary AST decreased statistically significantly in 2004 (odds ratio [OR] = 0.70, 95% confidence interval = 0.61 to 0.80) and 2005 (OR = 0.61, 95% confidence interval = 0.53 to 0.71) compared with 2003. AST use in the metastatic disease group was stable at 60% during the payment change, and the adjusted odds ratio of receiving AST in this group was unchanged in 2004-2005.

CONCLUSIONS

In this example of hormone therapy for prostate cancer, decreased physician reimbursement was associated with a reduction in overtreatment without a reduction in needed services.

摘要

背景

从 1991 年到 1999 年,雄激素抑制治疗(AST)在前列腺癌中的使用增加了两倍多。2003 年《医疗保险现代化法案》在 2004 年至 2005 年期间将 AST 的报销减少了 64%,但这种大幅减少对 AST 使用的影响尚不清楚。

方法

从监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中确定了 1992-2005 年期间被诊断患有前列腺癌的 72818 名男性组成的队列。从医疗保险索赔数据中,转移性疾病(n=8030)男性中 AST 持续 3 个月或以上被定义为指示性 AST。无指示性 AST 定义为在低危疾病(n=64788)男性中没有接受其他治疗(如根治性前列腺切除术或放疗)的 AST。根据 Medicare AST 报销中位数绘制接受 AST 的男性比例的年度图。使用多变量模型来估计低危和转移性疾病男性使用 AST 的几率,感兴趣的预测因素是支付变化的日历年。模型中的协变量包括年龄的 5 年分类、临床肿瘤分期(T1-T4)、世界卫生组织分级(1-3,未知)、Charlson 合并症(0、1、2、≥3)、种族、教育程度、收入和肿瘤登记处地点,均为分类变量。该模型还包括 AST 使用定义的变化(≥1、≥3 和≥6 个月的 AST)。所有统计检验均为双侧。

结果

低危组的 AST 使用比例在 2003 年达到 10.2%的峰值,然后在 2004 年下降至 7.1%,在 2005 年下降至 6.1%。在调整肿瘤和人口统计学协变量后,与 2003 年相比,2004 年(比值比[OR] = 0.70,95%置信区间= 0.61-0.80)和 2005 年(OR = 0.61,95%置信区间= 0.53-0.71)接受非指示性原发性 AST 的几率统计学显著降低。在支付变更期间,转移性疾病组的 AST 使用率稳定在 60%,该组接受 AST 的调整后比值比在 2004-2005 年没有变化。

结论

在这种前列腺癌激素治疗的例子中,医生报销减少与过度治疗减少而必要服务未减少相关。