• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Using concha electrodes to measure cochlear microphonic waveforms and auditory brainstem responses.使用耳甲电极测量耳蜗微音电位波形和听觉脑干反应。
Trends Amplif. 2010 Dec;14(4):211-7. doi: 10.1177/1084713810388811. Epub 2010 Dec 3.
2
Using a concha electrode to measure response patterns based on the amplitudes of cochlear microphonic waveforms across acoustic frequencies in normal-hearing subjects.使用耳甲电极基于正常听力受试者不同声学频率下的耳蜗微音电位波形幅度来测量反应模式。
Ear Hear. 2015 Jan;36(1):53-60. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000071.
3
High-frequency hearing impairment assessed with cochlear microphonics.通过耳蜗微音器电位评估高频听力损伤。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2012 Sep;132(9):967-73. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2012.679688. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
4
ABR recordings in newborns using an ear canal electrode.使用耳道电极对新生儿进行听性脑干反应记录。
Int J Audiol. 2008 Aug;47(8):499-504. doi: 10.1080/14992020802116268.
5
Effects of the intensity of masking noise on ear canal recorded low-frequency cochlear microphonic waveforms in normal hearing subjects.掩蔽噪声强度对正常听力受试者耳道记录的低频耳蜗微音电位波形的影响。
Hear Res. 2014 Jul;313:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.04.004. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
6
Response pattern based on the amplitude of ear canal recorded cochlear microphonic waveforms across acoustic frequencies in normal hearing subjects.基于正常听力受试者耳道记录的耳蜗微音电位波形幅度在不同声频下的反应模式。
Trends Amplif. 2012 Jun;16(2):117-26. doi: 10.1177/1084713812448547. Epub 2012 Jun 13.
7
Comparing Simultaneous Electrocochleography and Auditory Brainstem Response Measurements Using Three Different Extratympanic Electrodes.比较三种不同鼓室外电极的同时电测听和听性脑干反应测量。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2021 Jun;32(6):339-346. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1727273. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
8
Postoperative Electrocochleography from Hybrid Cochlear Implant users: An Alternative Analysis Procedure.混合人工耳蜗植入患者的术后电 Cochleography:一种替代分析程序。
Hear Res. 2018 Dec;370:304-315. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.10.016. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
9
Superiority of tympanic ball electrodes over mastoid needle electrodes for intraoperative monitoring of hearing function.鼓室球电极优于乳突针电极,可用于术中听力功能监测。
J Neurosurg. 2014 May;120(5):1042-7. doi: 10.3171/2014.1.JNS13396. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
10
Effects of Stimulus Intensity on Low-Frequency Toneburst Cochlear Microphonic Waveforms.刺激强度对低频短纯音耳蜗微音电位波形的影响。
Audiol Res. 2013 Feb 21;3(1):e3. doi: 10.4081/audiores.2013.e3. eCollection 2013 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Unraveling Cochlear Dynamics: The Effect of Clicks, Tone Burst Frequencies, Polarity, and Stimulus Rates on Cochlear Microphonics in Individuals with Normal Hearing.揭示耳蜗动力学:咔嗒声、短纯音频率、极性和刺激速率对正常听力个体耳蜗微音器电位的影响。
J Int Adv Otol. 2024 Nov 25;20(6):494-501. doi: 10.5152/iao.2024.241662.
2
The relationship between round window and ear canal Cochlear microphonic.圆窗与耳道耳蜗微音电位之间的关系。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022 Nov 25;7(6):2076-2083. doi: 10.1002/lio2.964. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Comparison of Cochlear Microphonics Magnitude with Broad and Narrow Band Stimuli in Healthy Adult Wistar Rats.健康成年Wistar大鼠中宽带和窄带刺激下耳蜗微音器电位幅度的比较
Iran J Child Neurol. 2018 Spring;12(2):58-65.
4
Hearing Assessment in Zebrafish During the First Week Postfertilization.受精后第一周斑马鱼的听力评估
Zebrafish. 2016 Apr;13(2):79-86. doi: 10.1089/zeb.2015.1166. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
5
Effects of Stimulus Intensity on Low-Frequency Toneburst Cochlear Microphonic Waveforms.刺激强度对低频短纯音耳蜗微音电位波形的影响。
Audiol Res. 2013 Feb 21;3(1):e3. doi: 10.4081/audiores.2013.e3. eCollection 2013 Jan 2.
6
Response pattern based on the amplitude of ear canal recorded cochlear microphonic waveforms across acoustic frequencies in normal hearing subjects.基于正常听力受试者耳道记录的耳蜗微音电位波形幅度在不同声频下的反应模式。
Trends Amplif. 2012 Jun;16(2):117-26. doi: 10.1177/1084713812448547. Epub 2012 Jun 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Rehabilitation and outcome of severe profound deafness in a group of 16 infants affected by congenital cytomegalovirus infection.一组16名受先天性巨细胞病毒感染影响的婴儿重度极重度耳聋的康复及预后
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Oct;266(10):1539-46. doi: 10.1007/s00405-009-0944-5. Epub 2009 Mar 13.
2
Association between surgical steps and intraoperative auditory brainstem response and electrocochleography waveforms during hearing preservation vestibular schwannoma surgery.听力保留型前庭神经鞘瘤手术中手术步骤与术中听觉脑干反应及耳蜗电图波形之间的关联
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Feb;266(2):225-9. doi: 10.1007/s00405-008-0741-6. Epub 2008 Jun 14.
3
The clinical application of potentials evoked from the peripheral auditory system.外周听觉系统诱发电位的临床应用。
Hear Res. 2008 Aug;242(1-2):184-97. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
4
Hearing preservation using combined monitoring of extra-tympanic electrocochleography and auditory brainstem responses during acoustic neuroma surgery.在听神经瘤手术期间联合使用鼓膜外电耳蜗图和听觉脑干反应监测进行听力保留
Int J Audiol. 2008 Apr;47(4):178-84. doi: 10.1080/14992020701802422.
5
Comparative evaluation of ABR abnormalities in patients with and without neurinoma of VIII cranial nerve.有和没有第八颅神经神经鞘瘤患者的听性脑干反应异常的比较评估
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2007 Apr;27(2):68-72.
6
[Clinical and audiological findings in children with auditory neuropathy].[听觉神经病患儿的临床及听力学表现]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2007 Jan;86(1):15-21. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-925369.
7
Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.听觉神经病患者的言语感知
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006 Apr;49(2):367-80. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/029).
8
ACTION CURRENTS IN THE AUDITORY NERVE IN RESPONSE TO ACOUSTICAL STIMULATION.听觉神经对声刺激的动作电流
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1930 May 15;16(5):344-50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.16.5.344.
9
Acoustic evoked response following transection of the eighth nerve in the rat.大鼠第八神经横断后的听觉诱发反应。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2000;142(9):1037-45. doi: 10.1007/s007010070060.
10
A comparison of extratympanic versus transtympanic recordings in electrocochleography.电耳蜗图中外鼓室与经鼓膜记录的比较。
Audiology. 1999 May-Jun;38(3):135-40. doi: 10.3109/00206099909073015.

使用耳甲电极测量耳蜗微音电位波形和听觉脑干反应。

Using concha electrodes to measure cochlear microphonic waveforms and auditory brainstem responses.

作者信息

Zhang Ming

机构信息

University of Alberta, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, Edmonton, AB, Canada.

出版信息

Trends Amplif. 2010 Dec;14(4):211-7. doi: 10.1177/1084713810388811. Epub 2010 Dec 3.

DOI:10.1177/1084713810388811
PMID:21131635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4111405/
Abstract

During electrocochleography, that is, ECochG or ECoG, a recording electrode can be placed in the ear canal lateral to the tympanic membrane. We designed a concha electrode to record both sinusoidal waveforms of cochlear microphonics (CMs) and auditory brainstem responses (ABRs). The amplitudes of CM waveforms and Wave I or compound action potentials (CAPs) recorded at the concha were greater than those recorded at the mastoid but slightly lower than those recorded at the ear canal. Wave V amplitudes recorded at the concha were greater than those recorded at the ear canal but lower than those recorded at the mastoid. There was not a significant difference between the amplitudes recorded at the concha and at the ear canal. For CM and Wave I or CAP, the latency recorded at the concha was longer than at the canal but shorter than at the mastoid; for Wave V, the reverse was true. However, these differences were not statistically significant and may be due to the distance to response generators. Aside from the advantages that the regular ECoG has over otoacoustic emission (OAE) testing, the concha electrode was also easier and safer to place and may be suitable for children, newborn screening, participants with canal conditions, and remote clinics which could have concerns with the availability and cost of a canal electrode. Using concha electrodes, we also experienced fewer postauricular artifacts than when using a mastoid electrode.

摘要

在进行耳蜗电图检查时,即ECochG或ECoG,记录电极可置于鼓膜外侧的耳道内。我们设计了一种耳甲电极,用于记录耳蜗微音电位(CMs)和听觉脑干反应(ABRs)的正弦波形。在耳甲处记录的CM波形和I波或复合动作电位(CAPs)的振幅大于在乳突处记录的振幅,但略低于在耳道处记录的振幅。在耳甲处记录的V波振幅大于在耳道处记录的振幅,但低于在乳突处记录的振幅。在耳甲处和耳道处记录的振幅之间没有显著差异。对于CM和I波或CAP,在耳甲处记录的潜伏期比在耳道处长,但比在乳突处短;对于V波,情况则相反。然而,这些差异没有统计学意义,可能是由于与反应发生器的距离所致。除了常规耳蜗电图检查相对于耳声发射(OAE)测试的优势外,耳甲电极放置起来也更容易、更安全,可能适用于儿童、新生儿筛查、有耳道疾病的参与者以及对耳道电极的可用性和成本有顾虑的偏远诊所。使用耳甲电极时,我们遇到的耳后伪迹也比使用乳突电极时少。