Kumar Eranna Prajwal, Varma Gowtham, Barman Animesh
Nitte (Deemed to be University), Nitte Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mangalore, India.
Anvi Hearing Solutions, Pune, India.
J Int Adv Otol. 2024 Nov 25;20(6):494-501. doi: 10.5152/iao.2024.241662.
Despite cochlear microphonic's potential clinical application, especially in ANSD diagnosis, the optimal parameters to record cochlear microphonics and the effect of various stimulus parameters are not well understood yet, which makes its recording a difficult procedure. The present study was undertaken to determine the effect of stimulus polarity, rate, stimulus type, and stimulus frequency on different aspects of cochlear microphonics, which could help to decide an optimal stimulus parameter that can be used to record CM.
The study involved 32 normal-hearing adults. CM was recorded from these individuals using extratympanic CM measurement from the ear canal independently for tone burst frequencies (500 Hz, 1 kHz, 4 kHz & 8 kHz) and click stimuli having rarefaction and condensation polarity at 30.1/sec and 59.1/sec repetition rates. Amplitude and latency were measured from the recorded waveforms and compared across and between stimulus conditions.
Results reveal that stimulus frequency and stimulus type have a significant effect on different parameters of CM. However, there was no significant effect of stimulus polarity and rate of stimulus on the amplitude and latency of cochlear microphonics. The amplitude and latency of the cochlear microphonics are inversely proportional to the stimulus frequency.
Hence, the study suggests the use of low-frequency tone burst (500 Hz/1 kHz) to elicit robust CM, which has greater application in the assessment of cochlear functioning over OAE as the latter gets affected by environmental and physiological noise and also due to middle ear pathology.
尽管耳蜗微音器电位具有潜在的临床应用价值,尤其是在听神经病谱障碍(ANSD)的诊断中,但记录耳蜗微音器电位的最佳参数以及各种刺激参数的影响尚未得到充分了解,这使得其记录成为一个困难的过程。本研究旨在确定刺激极性、速率、刺激类型和刺激频率对耳蜗微音器电位不同方面的影响,这有助于确定可用于记录CM的最佳刺激参数。
该研究纳入了32名听力正常的成年人。使用外耳道鼓膜外CM测量法,从这些个体独立记录CM,测量其对短纯音频率(500Hz、1kHz、4kHz和8kHz)以及具有稀疏和密集极性、重复率分别为30.1/秒和59.1/秒的短声刺激的反应。从记录的波形中测量幅度和潜伏期,并在不同刺激条件之间进行比较。
结果表明,刺激频率和刺激类型对CM的不同参数有显著影响。然而,刺激极性和刺激速率对耳蜗微音器电位的幅度和潜伏期没有显著影响。耳蜗微音器电位的幅度和潜伏期与刺激频率成反比。
因此,该研究建议使用低频短纯音(500Hz/1kHz)来引出较强的CM,与耳声发射相比,CM在评估耳蜗功能方面具有更大的应用价值,因为耳声发射会受到环境和生理噪声以及中耳病变的影响。