• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度一家三级护理医院中抗菌药物和粒细胞集落刺激因子在癌症患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症中的应用

Use of antimicrobial agents and granulocyte colony stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia in cancer patients in a tertiary care hospital in India.

作者信息

Roy V, Saxena D, Agarwal M, Bahadur A K, Mishra B

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Indian J Cancer. 2010 Oct-Dec;47(4):430-6. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.73568.

DOI:10.4103/0019-509X.73568
PMID:21131758
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Use of antimicrobials (AM) and granulocyte colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) affect the outcome and cost of treatment of febrile neutropenia (FN). There are no studies describing the AM utilization pattern or the use of G-CSF and cost incurred on them in cancer patients with FN from India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A study was conducted in a tertiary care, teaching hospital in New Delhi, India, with the objectives of describing the utilization pattern of AM and G-CSF in cancer patients with FN. The efficacy and costs of AM and G-CSF prescribed were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 211 patients with FN were enrolled in the study. A majority of 207 (98.1%) were in the low-risk category. The average number of AM used per patient was 2.45 ± 0.02 and the AM exposure density was 1.19. All patients were administered five different combinations of AM regimens and G-CSF, irrespective of the risk category. No difference in the time to defervesence or in the recovery of ANC counts were observed with the different AM regimens. The average drug cost per febrile neutropenia episode (FNE) was Rs 4694.45 ± 296.35 (113.95 ± 7.19$). G-CSF accounted for 76.14 - 97.58% of the total costs.

CONCLUSION

Large variations in the pattern of AM prescribed with routine use of G-CSF, irrespective of the risk status, was observed. Guidelines for the rational and cost-effective use of AM and G-CSF in patients with FN needed to be prepared. This was especially important as treatment was given free of cost to all patients admitted in the government health facility.

摘要

背景

抗菌药物(AM)和粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)的使用会影响发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)的治疗结果和成本。目前尚无研究描述印度癌症患者 FN 中 AM 的使用模式、G-CSF 的使用情况及其产生的成本。

材料与方法

在印度新德里的一家三级护理教学医院进行了一项研究,目的是描述癌症 FN 患者中 AM 和 G-CSF 的使用模式。还评估了所开具的 AM 和 G-CSF 的疗效及成本。

结果

共有 211 例 FN 患者纳入研究。其中大多数 207 例(98.1%)属于低风险类别。每位患者使用 AM 的平均数量为 2.45±0.02,AM 暴露密度为 1.19。所有患者均接受了五种不同的 AM 方案和 G-CSF 组合,无论风险类别如何。不同的 AM 方案在退热时间或中性粒细胞计数恢复方面未观察到差异。每例发热性中性粒细胞减少症发作(FNE)的平均药物成本为 4694.45 卢比±296.35 卢比(113.95±7.19 美元)。G-CSF 占总成本的 76.14 - 97.58%。

结论

观察到无论风险状况如何,常规使用 G-CSF 时 AM 的处方模式存在很大差异。需要制定 FN 患者合理且具有成本效益的 AM 和 G-CSF 使用指南。这一点尤为重要,因为政府医疗机构对所有入院患者免费提供治疗。

相似文献

1
Use of antimicrobial agents and granulocyte colony stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia in cancer patients in a tertiary care hospital in India.印度一家三级护理医院中抗菌药物和粒细胞集落刺激因子在癌症患者发热性中性粒细胞减少症中的应用
Indian J Cancer. 2010 Oct-Dec;47(4):430-6. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.73568.
2
Review of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in the treatment of established febrile neutropenia.粒细胞集落刺激因子治疗已确诊的发热性中性粒细胞减少症的综述。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2011 Sep;17(3):225-32. doi: 10.1177/1078155210374129. Epub 2010 Jun 18.
3
Effects of a formulary change from granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on outcomes in patients treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy.从粒细胞集落刺激因子改为粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子的处方变更对接受骨髓抑制性化疗患者结局的影响。
Pharmacotherapy. 2005 Mar;25(3):372-8. doi: 10.1592/phco.25.3.372.61608.
4
Prevention of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia by prophylactic antibiotics plus or minus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in small-cell lung cancer: a Dutch Randomized Phase III Study.预防性使用抗生素加或减粒细胞集落刺激因子预防小细胞肺癌化疗引起的发热性中性粒细胞减少:一项荷兰随机III期研究
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 1;23(31):7974-84. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.7955.
5
Use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: a survey among Italian medical oncologists.粒细胞集落刺激因子的使用:意大利医学肿瘤学家的一项调查。
Oncol Rep. 2005 Dec;14(6):1405-12.
6
Randomized comparison of antibiotics with and without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in children with chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group.化疗引起的发热性中性粒细胞减少症患儿使用抗生素联合或不联合粒细胞集落刺激因子的随机对照比较:儿童肿瘤学组报告
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005 Sep;45(3):274-80. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20366.
7
Hematopoietic growth factors in patients receiving intensive chemotherapy for malignant disorders: studies of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interleukin-3 (IL-3) and Flt-3 ligand (Flt3L).接受恶性疾病强化化疗患者的造血生长因子:粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)、粒细胞-巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)、白细胞介素-3(IL-3)和Flt-3配体(Flt3L)的研究。
Eur Cytokine Netw. 2001 Apr-Jun;12(2):231-8.
8
An Australian survey of clinical practices in management of neutropenic fever in adult cancer patients 2009.2009 年澳大利亚成人癌症患者中性粒细胞减少性发热管理的临床实践调查。
Intern Med J. 2011 Jan;41(1b):110-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2010.02342.x.
9
Cost-effectiveness of adding granulocyte colony-stimulating factor to primary prophylaxis with antibiotics in small-cell lung cancer.在小细胞肺癌中,在抗生素一级预防基础上加用粒细胞集落刺激因子的成本效益分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jul 1;24(19):2991-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.3281. Epub 2006 May 8.
10
Use of myeloid growth factors for patients with febrile neutropenia: plus ca change, plus c'est la même chose.髓系生长因子在发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者中的应用:万变不离其宗。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2005 Sep;45(3):242-3. doi: 10.1002/pbc.20449.

引用本文的文献

1
Epedimiologic, clinical profile and factors affecting the outcome in febrile neutropenia.发热性中性粒细胞减少症的流行病学、临床特征及影响预后的因素。
South Asian J Cancer. 2017 Jan-Mar;6(1):25-27. doi: 10.4103/2278-330X.202565.