Celiac Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Dec;105(12):2520-4. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.276.
Contemporary serologic testing has revolutionized the field of celiac disease (CD). Highly accurate serologic assays have shown the prevalence of CD to be nearly 1:100 in many populations. These mostly ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay)-based tests allow noninvasive screening and detection. However, the growing number of available serologic tests necessitates reevaluation of their predictive power as a single test or in combination. We review the available tests for CD, including antibodies against gliadin, endomysium, tissue transglutaminase, and deamidated gliadin, and the evidence for preferential use of specific tests in different settings. Despite several novel developments, standardized ELISA-based assays for IgA autoantibodies against tissue transglutaminase remain the test of choice for most populations. We discuss the need to develop tests for CD activity in order to assess the efficacy of upcoming nondietary therapies.
当代血清学检测技术使乳糜泻(CD)领域发生了革命性变化。高度准确的血清学检测表明,在许多人群中,CD 的患病率接近 1:100。这些主要基于 ELISA(酶联免疫吸附试验)的检测方法允许进行非侵入性筛查和检测。然而,越来越多的血清学检测方法需要重新评估它们作为单一检测或联合检测的预测能力。我们回顾了 CD 的可用检测方法,包括针对麦胶蛋白、内肌膜、组织转谷氨酰胺酶和脱酰胺麦胶蛋白的抗体,以及在不同情况下优先使用特定检测方法的证据。尽管有几项新的进展,但针对组织转谷氨酰胺酶的 IgA 自身抗体的标准化 ELISA 检测仍然是大多数人群的首选检测方法。我们讨论了开发 CD 活性检测方法的必要性,以评估即将出现的非饮食疗法的疗效。