• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鞘内阿片类药物泵与脊髓刺激同步用于疼痛管理:11例腰椎手术失败综合征患者的分析

Simultaneous intrathecal opioid pump and spinal cord stimulation for pain management: analysis of 11 patients with failed back surgery syndrome.

作者信息

Tomycz Nestor D, Ortiz Veronica, Moossy John J

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15232, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2010 Dec;24(4):374-83. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2010.523066.

DOI:10.3109/15360288.2010.523066
PMID:21133746
Abstract

Dual-modality management of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) using a combination of an intrathecal opioid pump (IOP) and spinal cord stimulator (SCS) has not been investigated. The authors performed a retrospective review of 11 patients (8 men, 3 women) with FBSS who underwent nonsimultaneous surgical implantation of both an IOP and a thoracic SCS. Chart review and structured phone interviews were performed to obtain follow-up. Of the two modalities, 3 patients (27%) had an IOP placed first and 8 patients (73%) had a SCS implanted initially. Mean follow-up was 41.7 months (3-97 months). All 11 patients (100%) stated that the dual-modality treatment improved their quality of life and all continue to use both an IOP and SCS for pain control. Six patients (55%) felt that the IOP provided superior pain relief as compared to the SCS, 4 patients (36%) felt that IOP and SCS provided a similar degree of pain relief, and 1 patient (9%) said the SCS provided better pain relief than the IOP. Nine patients (82%) claimed that dual-modality treatment improved their activities of daily living. Nine patients (82%) reported that the combination of IOP and SCS treatment had allowed them to significantly decrease their oral pain medication requirements. Seven patients (64%) had hardware-related complications which required surgery; of this group, 2 patients (18%) needed more than one operation. Six patients (55%) had minor postoperative complications, which were managed nonoperatively. Overall, 10 patients (91%) were glad that they had implantation of both an IOP and SCS and would recommend this combined therapy to other patients. Dual neuroaugmentative treatment with an IOP and thoracic SCS can be safely performed and may provide satisfactory pain relief in appropriately selected patients with FBSS.

摘要

尚未对使用鞘内阿片类药物泵(IOP)和脊髓刺激器(SCS)联合治疗失败的脊柱手术综合征(FBSS)的双模式管理进行研究。作者对11例接受了IOP和胸段SCS非同时手术植入的FBSS患者(8例男性,3例女性)进行了回顾性研究。通过查阅病历和进行结构化电话访谈来获得随访结果。在这两种治疗方式中,3例患者(27%)先植入了IOP,8例患者(73%)最初植入了SCS。平均随访时间为41.7个月(3 - 97个月)。所有11例患者(100%)均表示双模式治疗改善了他们的生活质量,并且所有人都继续使用IOP和SCS来控制疼痛。6例患者(55%)认为IOP比SCS提供了更好的疼痛缓解,4例患者(36%)认为IOP和SCS提供的疼痛缓解程度相似,1例患者(9%)表示SCS比IOP提供了更好的疼痛缓解。9例患者(82%)称双模式治疗改善了他们的日常生活活动能力。9例患者(82%)报告说IOP和SCS联合治疗使他们能够显著减少口服止痛药物的需求量。7例患者(64%)出现了与硬件相关的并发症,需要进行手术;在这组患者中,2例患者(18%)需要不止一次手术。6例患者(55%)出现了轻微的术后并发症,通过非手术方式进行了处理。总体而言,10例患者(91%)很高兴他们植入了IOP和SCS,并会向其他患者推荐这种联合治疗方法。使用IOP和胸段SCS进行双神经增强治疗可以安全地进行,并且可能为适当选择的FBSS患者提供令人满意的疼痛缓解。

相似文献

1
Simultaneous intrathecal opioid pump and spinal cord stimulation for pain management: analysis of 11 patients with failed back surgery syndrome.鞘内阿片类药物泵与脊髓刺激同步用于疼痛管理:11例腰椎手术失败综合征患者的分析
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2010 Dec;24(4):374-83. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2010.523066.
2
The effects of spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain are sustained: a 24-month follow-up of the prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial of the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation.脊髓刺激治疗神经性疼痛的效果具有持续性:一项关于脊髓刺激有效性的前瞻性随机对照多中心试验的24个月随访
Neurosurgery. 2008 Oct;63(4):762-70; discussion 770. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000325731.46702.D9.
3
Spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management for neuropathic pain: a multicentre randomised controlled trial in patients with failed back surgery syndrome.脊髓刺激与传统药物治疗对神经性疼痛的疗效比较:一项针对腰椎手术失败综合征患者的多中心随机对照试验
Pain. 2007 Nov;132(1-2):179-88. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.07.028. Epub 2007 Sep 12.
4
Counting the costs: case management implications of spinal cord stimulation treatment for failed back surgery syndrome.计算成本:脊髓刺激疗法对腰椎手术失败综合征的病例管理影响
Prof Case Manag. 2011 Jan-Feb;16(1):27-36. doi: 10.1097/NCM.0b013e3181e9263c.
5
[Patient satisfaction with spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome].[脊髓刺激治疗腰椎手术失败综合征的患者满意度]
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2007 Jan;54(1):17-22.
6
Utilization of spinal cord stimulation in patients with failed back surgery syndrome.脊髓刺激在失败腰椎手术综合征患者中的应用。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 May 20;39(12):E719-27. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000320.
7
The use of spinal cord stimulation and intrathecal drug delivery in the treatment of low back-related pain.脊髓刺激和鞘内药物输注在治疗下背部相关疼痛中的应用。
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2010 Nov;21(4):851-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2010.06.004.
8
Neurostimulation for chronic neuropathic back pain in failed back surgery syndrome.神经刺激治疗腰椎手术失败综合征中的慢性神经性背痛
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006 Apr;31(4 Suppl):S25-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.12.012.
9
Quality of life, resource consumption and costs of spinal cord stimulation versus conventional medical management in neuropathic pain patients with failed back surgery syndrome (PROCESS trial).脊髓刺激与传统药物治疗对腰椎手术失败综合征神经性疼痛患者的生活质量、资源消耗及成本的影响(PROCESS试验)
Eur J Pain. 2008 Nov;12(8):1047-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.01.014. Epub 2008 Mar 21.
10
Spinal cord stimulation in sympathetically maintained complex regional pain syndrome type I with severe disability. A prospective clinical study.脊髓刺激治疗重度残疾的Ⅰ型交感神经维持性复杂性区域疼痛综合征:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Eur J Pain. 2005 Aug;9(4):363-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.09.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferences of Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis for Intrathecal Drug Delivery: Choosing between an Implanted Drug-Delivery Device and Therapeutic Lumbar Puncture.肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者对鞘内药物递送的偏好:在植入式药物递送装置和治疗性腰椎穿刺之间进行选择。
Patient. 2024 Mar;17(2):161-177. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00665-4. Epub 2023 Dec 14.
2
Transcutaneous spinal stimulation in patients with intrathecal baclofen pump delivery system: A preliminary safety study.鞘内注射巴氯芬泵输送系统患者的经皮脊髓刺激:一项初步安全性研究。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Dec 21;16:1075293. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1075293. eCollection 2022.
3
Best Practices for Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Treatment 2.0 (MIST): Consensus Guidance from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN).
微创腰椎管狭窄症治疗2.0最佳实践(MIST):美国疼痛与神经科学学会(ASPN)的共识指南。
J Pain Res. 2022 May 5;15:1325-1354. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S355285. eCollection 2022.
4
Pressure pain assessment may predict the outcome of spinal cord stimulation for refractory epilepsy.压痛评估可能预测难治性癫痫脊髓刺激的结果。
Am J Clin Exp Immunol. 2018 Dec 20;7(6):95-99. eCollection 2018.
5
The Results of Treating Failed Back Surgery Syndrome by Adhesiolysis: Comparing the One- and Three-Day Protocols.粘连松解术治疗腰椎手术失败综合征的结果:一日与三日方案的比较
Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Aug 22;7(5):e60271. doi: 10.5812/aapm.60271. eCollection 2017 Oct.