• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经桡动脉入路行心脏介入治疗的实施:护理人员制定质量保证方案的有力依据。

Implementation of radial arterial access for cardiac interventions: a strong case for quality assurance protocols by the nursing staff.

机构信息

Interventional Cardiology Unit, Cardiovascular Department, Santa Croce and Carle Hospital, Italy.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2011 Feb;12(2):116-21. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328340392c.

DOI:10.2459/JCM.0b013e328340392c
PMID:21135588
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Radial arterial access is becoming increasingly popular for coronary angiography and angioplasty. The technique is, however, more demanding than femoral arterial access, and hemostasis is not care-free. A quality assurance program was run by our nursing staff, with patient follow-up, to monitor radial arterial access implementation in our laboratory.

METHOD

In 973 consecutive patients, both a hydrophilic sheath and an inflatable bandage for hemostasis were used. Bandage inflation volume and time were both reduced through subsequent data audit and protocol changes (A = 175 patients; B = 297; C = 501).

RESULTS

An increase was achieved in the percentage of patients with neither loss of radial pulse nor hematoma of any size (A = 81.3%, B = 90.9%, C = 92.2%, P < 0.001), and no discomfort at all (A = 44.2%, B = 75.1%, C = 89.3%, P < 0.001). Follow-up was available for 965 patients (99%), and in 956, the access site could be re-inspected at least once. There were no vascular complications. Overall, the radial artery pulse was absent at latest follow-up in 0.6% of cases (95% confidence interval 0.21-1.05%). In 460 consecutive patients with complete assessment in protocol C, a palpable arterial pulse was absent in 5% of cases at about 20 h after hemostasis. Barbeau's test was positive in 26.5% of patients (95% confidence interval 22.5-30.6%). They had a significantly lower body weight, a lower systolic blood pressure at hemostasis, and a higher bandage inflation volume; a hematoma of any size and the report of any discomfort were also more frequent. Barbeau's test returned to normal in 30% of them 3-60 days later.

CONCLUSION

Our nurse-led quality assurance program helped us in reducing minor vascular sequelae and improving patient comfort after radial access. Early occlusion of the radial artery as detected by pulse oxymeter is frequent, often reversible, and may be mostly related to trauma/occlusion of the artery during hemostasis.

摘要

背景

桡动脉入路在冠状动脉造影和血管成形术中越来越受欢迎。然而,与股动脉入路相比,该技术要求更高,止血并非无忧。我们的护理人员实施了一项质量保证计划,对患者进行随访,以监测我们实验室中桡动脉入路的实施情况。

方法

在 973 例连续患者中,均使用亲水鞘和充气止血带。通过随后的数据审核和方案变更(A = 175 例;B = 297 例;C = 501 例),减少了止血带充气量和时间。

结果

患者桡动脉搏动无减弱且无任何大小血肿的百分比增加(A = 81.3%,B = 90.9%,C = 92.2%,P < 0.001),无任何不适(A = 44.2%,B = 75.1%,C = 89.3%,P < 0.001)。965 例患者(99%)可获得随访,956 例患者至少有一次可对入路部位进行复查。无血管并发症。总体而言,在最新随访时,桡动脉搏动消失的病例占 0.6%(95%置信区间 0.21-1.05%)。在 460 例接受方案 C 完全评估的连续患者中,止血后约 20 小时,有 5%的患者脉搏触诊无搏动。Barbeau 测试阳性的患者占 26.5%(95%置信区间 22.5-30.6%)。他们的体重明显较轻,止血时收缩压较低,止血带充气量较大;有任何大小的血肿和任何不适报告的情况也更频繁。Barbeau 测试在 30%的患者中在 3-60 天后恢复正常。

结论

我们的护理人员主导的质量保证计划有助于减少桡动脉入路后的小血管后遗症并提高患者舒适度。通过脉搏血氧仪检测到的桡动脉早期闭塞较为常见,通常是可逆的,可能主要与止血时动脉的创伤/闭塞有关。

相似文献

1
Implementation of radial arterial access for cardiac interventions: a strong case for quality assurance protocols by the nursing staff.经桡动脉入路行心脏介入治疗的实施:护理人员制定质量保证方案的有力依据。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2011 Feb;12(2):116-21. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328340392c.
2
A randomized comparison of TR band and radistop hemostatic compression devices after transradial coronary intervention.经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗后 TR 止血带与 Radistop 止血器的随机比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Nov 1;76(5):660-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22615.
3
Radial compression guided by mean artery pressure versus standard compression with a pneumatic device (RACOMAP).基于平均动脉压引导的桡动脉压迫与使用气动装置的标准压迫(RACOMAP)。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Mar 1;73(4):467-72. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21900.
4
Laissez-faire hemostasis and transradial injuries.放任止血与经桡动脉损伤
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Mar 1;73(4):473-4. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22006.
5
Effect of duration of hemostatic compression on radial artery occlusion after transradial access.经桡动脉入路止血压迫时间对桡动脉闭塞的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Jan 1;79(1):78-81. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22963. Epub 2011 May 16.
6
Interruption of blood flow during compression and radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization.经桡动脉导管插入术后压迫期间血流中断及桡动脉闭塞。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007 Aug 1;70(2):185-9. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21058.
7
Femoral artery complications after cardiac catheterization: a study of patient profile.心脏导管插入术后股动脉并发症:患者资料研究
Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 Apr;24(3):328-35. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2009.06.025. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
8
Complications of the transradial approach for coronary interventions: a consensus statement.经桡动脉途径冠状动脉介入治疗的并发症:共识声明。
J Indian Med Assoc. 2009 Sep;107(9):592-3.
9
Predictors of complications associated with closure devices after transfemoral percutaneous coronary procedures.
Crit Care Nurse. 2005 Jun;25(3):30-2, 34-7.
10
Prevention of radial artery occlusion-patent hemostasis evaluation trial (PROPHET study): a randomized comparison of traditional versus patency documented hemostasis after transradial catheterization.桡动脉闭塞预防-通畅止血评估试验(PROPHET研究):经桡动脉导管插入术后传统止血与记录通畅性止血的随机对照比较
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Sep 1;72(3):335-340. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21639.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Practice of Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention: Results from the Korean Transradial Intervention Prospective Registry.经桡动脉冠状动脉造影和介入治疗的当前实践:韩国经桡动脉介入治疗前瞻性注册研究结果
Korean Circ J. 2015 Nov;45(6):457-68. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2015.45.6.457. Epub 2015 Nov 25.